Bersi vs Vw 14-4-08 (2 combats)

Talk about your RvR experience here
Demiurgo
Phoenix Knight
 
Posts: 1499
Joined: Mar 11, 2007 01:00

Postby Demiurgo » Apr 15, 2008 10:58

This is what I meant with vw strange high defense^
It's true that vw got 33% abs (1% less than plated armor) but >[Valewalkers still have the armorfactors of a caster!]< and it's around 200 points lower than a plate wearer (and don't tell me that 50 af of charge is the difference). Anyway you can always try to hit a capped armsman (neutral to slash) and you will check that you do really more and more dmg even if it has muuuuch more af and more abs.

P.S. I can't see well the shots and also downloaded they have too much low quality, if you can repost some 1000+ :D

User avatar
Hedra
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 1002
Joined: Mar 14, 2007 01:00

Postby Hedra » Apr 15, 2008 12:59

Well, with AF charge, my vw has 645 AF, that's more than scale without charge ... So 33% absorb + 645 AF + neutral to all gives you high resistance I guess.
But yeah if you hit more dmg on a plate wearer, there's a problem. But I'm curious to see it cause i doubt of it ^^
I am assuming direct control.

User avatar
Pinky
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 237
Joined: May 16, 2006 00:00
Location: Germany

Postby Pinky » Apr 15, 2008 13:05

plate is vulnerable to crush
MfG Silfa
[img]http://herald.uthgard.net/daoc/sig.php?name=Muriel&s=-1[/img]
Ente Ente Ente Ente Ente Ente Ente Ente Ente Ente Ente
-Ralph Wiggum-

Demiurgo
Phoenix Knight
 
Posts: 1499
Joined: Mar 11, 2007 01:00

Postby Demiurgo » Apr 15, 2008 20:58

Hedra wrote:Well, with AF charge, my vw has 645 AF, that's more than scale without charge ... So 33% absorb + 645 AF + neutral to all gives you high resistance I guess.
But yeah if you hit more dmg on a plate wearer, there's a problem. But I'm curious to see it cause i doubt of it ^^

I though with cloth you had 550 with shield af+af charge which should be around 50 :O

User avatar
malle
Banned
 
Posts: 632
Joined: Jul 13, 2007 00:00

Postby malle » Apr 15, 2008 21:12

af charge should not stack with specc af selfbuff?!

User avatar
Hedra
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 1002
Joined: Mar 14, 2007 01:00

Postby Hedra » Apr 15, 2008 21:37

570 with self AF
645 with self AF + AF charge
By the way it's the same for every caster isn't it ?

@malle: What do you mean ? Casters self AF is like base buff^^
I am assuming direct control.

User avatar
Girak
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 235
Joined: Oct 04, 2007 00:00

Postby Girak » Apr 15, 2008 21:46

LoL
AF buff got 125% of the value it got on live.
Absorb buff is the same i think.
and DO NOT say i have to make screenshots on live....
<br><br>

User avatar
Haldan
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 921
Joined: Feb 29, 2008 01:00

Postby Haldan » Apr 15, 2008 22:04

The live Screenshots will be taken by us. Issue opened in our tracker.

User avatar
massivmampfer
Phoenix Knight
 
Posts: 1387
Joined: Feb 06, 2006 01:00
Location: Hibernia (Bremen)

Postby massivmampfer » Apr 15, 2008 22:08

Hedra wrote:570 with self AF
645 with self AF + AF charge
By the way it's the same for every caster isn't it ?

@malle: What do you mean ? Casters self AF is like base buff^^


I fear you might be wrong hedra. Like the Dex/qui and Str/ con pots/charges they shouldnt stack with another buff of its own kind. Base af and spec af may be different things but spec af and spec af are supposed to raise the af beyond the armors max af unlike the base af which only raises to the max amount of af you can have without further af raises. Caster af in this case is a self buff and not a conc based af buff so another af charge shouldnt be able to stack.

User avatar
Hedra
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 1002
Joined: Mar 14, 2007 01:00

Postby Hedra » Apr 15, 2008 22:32

No I'm sure about it, when I played alb (on live), casters could get spec AF buff from cleric. And spec AF = AF charge.
Self AF doesn't stack with base AF but it does with spec.
I am assuming direct control.

User avatar
massivmampfer
Phoenix Knight
 
Posts: 1387
Joined: Feb 06, 2006 01:00
Location: Hibernia (Bremen)

Postby massivmampfer » Apr 15, 2008 23:03

hm...only one question left for me: Does af spec buff stack with spec af charge? If yes on uthgard is it correct? I guess its not correct that this should work in case its possible.

User avatar
Pirith
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 499
Joined: Aug 31, 2005 00:00
Location: Muspelheim aus [M]idgard.

Postby Pirith » Apr 15, 2008 23:57

Not a single spec buff should stack with charges.
Exemple that shouldn't stack

- Strenght/constitution
- Dexterity/quickness
- AF (ranger, etc)
- Haste
- Damange add (well it stacks with 2 but with a special formula posted 3 or 4 times all over the forum)

So in this case, only base AF (from any healer class) could stack with a spec AF. (note that base AF is useless with a lvl 51 full qual 99 armor).
And therefore should NOT stack with charge.

Regards.
Last edited by Pirith on Apr 16, 2008 04:55, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Hedra
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 1002
Joined: Mar 14, 2007 01:00

Postby Hedra » Apr 16, 2008 02:35

Pirith wrote:- AF (ranger, caster, etc)

Once again, caster self AF is considered as a base buff and stacks with spec AF. But indeed I think ranger's one doesn't stack cause it's spec (not sure about it)
I am assuming direct control.

User avatar
Pirith
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 499
Joined: Aug 31, 2005 00:00
Location: Muspelheim aus [M]idgard.

Postby Pirith » Apr 16, 2008 04:55

You're right - post edited.

User avatar
Murks
Myrmidon
 
Posts: 103
Joined: Oct 18, 2007 00:00

Postby Murks » Apr 16, 2008 10:53

Rapiz wrote:A valewalker who is able to nuke and have some other great advantages (root, AF...etc.), cloth wearer, shouldn't deal more damage in melee than a pure tank and receive less in my opinion, then who wanna play a pure tank? Maybe this is a clue why hib groups 90% "tanks" are Valewalkers.


In albion you have alot of reaver as tanks in group, in midgard you have savages as tanks in group...in rvr and pvm...this 3 classes are special and make alot of damage...more than a standard tank...and i think its ok, its a SI class and there is no reason to discuss about it. SI classes have more abilities, are stronger...

This week we discuss about the valewalker and next week we take the reaver...or the savage...and dont forget the bonedancer... :)

PreviousNext

Return to Realm versus Realm

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests

Friday, 16. May 2025

Artwork and screen shots Copyright © 2001-2004 Mythic Entertainment, Inc. All rights reserved. Used with permission of Mythic Entertainment. Mythic Entertainment, the Mythic Entertainment logo, "Dark Age of Camelot," "Shrouded Isles," "Foundations," "New Frontiers," "Trials of Atlantis," "Catacombs," "Darkness Rising," the Dark Age of Camelot and subsequent logos, and the stylized Celtic knot are trademarks of Mythic Entertainment, Inc.

Valid XHTML & CSS | Original Design by: LernVid.com | Modified by Uthgard Staff