Uthgard • View topic - Spring news!

Spring news!

690 posts • Page 7 of 46 • 1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 46

devilsfury Warder Posts: 60 Joined: Feb 18, 2009 01:00	by devilsfury » Mar 06, 2015 18:01 Thanks gents for all of your hard work! I have literally played, tried or beaten many games since Uthgard went down and have yet to find a game like better than Uthgard DAoC. I look forward to playing again in all three realms!

Caemma Phoenix Knight Posts: 1358 Joined: Oct 14, 2011 21:15 Location: Unknown	by Caemma » Mar 06, 2015 18:49 Jerrian wrote:So, you think Shrouded Isles will be done in a month or so after relaunch? I don ´t know about the shape of it, but if it would be in a good one, Staff would release it just together combined with old zones for less inconvenience, right? I would suppose Shrouded Isles will take half a year + ,without knowing about the current state, it ´s a big project. Exactly Was the opening of CU alpha that give the idea to open Uth before SI? Just curious There was a time when Uthgard 1.0 existed and maaaany toons and arrpees arose... but now:

Trishin Game Master Posts: 5048 Joined: Apr 07, 2010 00:00	by Trishin » Mar 06, 2015 19:01 Caemma wrote: Jerrian wrote:So, you think Shrouded Isles will be done in a month or so after relaunch? I don ´t know about the shape of it, but if it would be in a good one, Staff would release it just together combined with old zones for less inconvenience, right? I would suppose Shrouded Isles will take half a year + ,without knowing about the current state, it ´s a big project. Exactly Was the opening of CU alpha that give the idea to open Uth before SI? Just curious No Got any questions? Submit them to me and I will try to get them answered in our grab bag ! Rajnish wrote:Why didn't someone warn me that being GM means lots of boring research, logging, testing and organizing data.... I thought it was all about looking cool.... Uthgard Rules \|\| How to connect \|\| FAQ

Nayru Developer Posts: 8834 Joined: Jan 08, 2007 01:00	by Nayru » Mar 07, 2015 00:16 Crystalin wrote: what about Market Explorer, it's allowed on a classic server? Yes!

Saarn INVADER Posts: 0 Joined: Dec 18, 2014 22:06	by Saarn » Mar 07, 2015 00:24 Camelot unchained June 2016 ETA Can you guys match that at least? and push-back if needed.

blubbo Warder Posts: 16 Joined: Jun 03, 2012 15:45	by blubbo » Mar 07, 2015 01:36 If you gonna implement this mechanic that allows you to place the last item in your inventory on the hotbar so you do not have to re-add it to your quickbar potion system, why not just implement bottles then? I know that this has been discussed a while now, but I still don't get it. Ah well, I don't care. At least Uth is coming back (yay!)

Ilerget Phoenix Knight Posts: 1487 Joined: Jul 04, 2011 11:54	by Ilerget » Mar 07, 2015 10:41 McnastyOG wrote:Why have buff pots at all? You guys want it classic right? Well I sure don't recall having buff pots/barrels in real classic DAoC. Buff pots are nothing but an annoyance. Why force players to go re-up on this in order to compete? I always thought that only deserve buffs who speced for it It's the thrill of the chase and I'm coming after you.

Jarqo Eagle Knight Posts: 565 Joined: Jul 09, 2012 16:02 Location: Uthgard,Hibernia	by Jarqo » Mar 07, 2015 10:53 Just remove all pots and charges, problem solved Best Sniper Ranger on Uthgard since 2007. Looking for maps? Try http://jarqo91.wix.com/daoccamps

Trishin Game Master Posts: 5048 Joined: Apr 07, 2010 00:00	by Trishin » Mar 07, 2015 11:34 The pot/barrel issue is really not up for debate so you might as well save yourself the trouble and time debating it at the moment. We have already discussed this for more than 2 years internally. We have now decided on a direction and will stick to it in order to progress and put focus on other areas. We hope you will understand and do the same. Got any questions? Submit them to me and I will try to get them answered in our grab bag ! Rajnish wrote:Why didn't someone warn me that being GM means lots of boring research, logging, testing and organizing data.... I thought it was all about looking cool.... Uthgard Rules \|\| How to connect \|\| FAQ

Foneb Eagle Knight Posts: 640 Joined: Jan 15, 2010 01:00	by Foneb » Mar 07, 2015 13:01 McnastyOG wrote:Why have buff pots at all? You guys want it classic right? Well I sure don't recall having buff pots/barrels in real classic DAoC. Buff pots are nothing but an annoyance. Why force players to go re-up on this in order to compete? I remenber having a buffbot in classic Also yeah i put it to rest internly but it makes scuh a good discussion/flame topic Hiois - Ranger 9lX Uth 1.0 Hiois - Enchanter 6lx Uth 2.0 Mugad - Warden 4lx Uth 2.0 Esigil - Druid 3lx Uth 2.0 Hioisx - Nightshade 1lx Uth 2.0

Zippity Phoenix Knight Posts: 1603 Joined: Oct 23, 2007 00:00	by Zippity » Mar 07, 2015 16:30 Keep up the good work.

Abydos Game Master Posts: 6839 Joined: Jan 22, 2011 21:14	by Abydos » Mar 07, 2015 18:15 Trishin wrote:The pot/barrel issue is really not up for debate so you might as well save yourself the trouble and time debating it at the moment. We have already discussed this for more than 2 years internally. We have now decided on a direction and will stick to it in order to progress and put focus on other areas. We hope you will understand and do the same. Trishin check the staff forum. Its been a discussion in staff since 2008 (and probably earlier, I just don't read German) Regarding " I don't remember buff pots!" -- Alchemy introduced them, so they were available in 1.65

Austerim Alerion Knight Posts: 2743 Joined: Dec 15, 2010 16:27	by Austerim » Mar 07, 2015 18:19 Any reason you guys are going with the old AT system instead of new besides CLASSIC CLASSIC CLASSIC? [3:10pm] <myrmidon^> You have to be a c*** to be awesome at daoc [3:10pm] <myrmidon^> that's what I learnt [3:11pm] <Frosty_> then why does austerim suck lordgriffon wrote:Oh by the way... ever seen a group of 8 smite clerics? Or play against a group like that? I have. Absolute devastation. The group that runs up against them can't kill them fast enough because smite clerics have sooooooo many tools at their disposal combined with decent ranged damage with 8 of them dudes doing it!

Trishin Game Master Posts: 5048 Joined: Apr 07, 2010 00:00	by Trishin » Mar 07, 2015 18:25 No, and that is the only reason we need. Got any questions? Submit them to me and I will try to get them answered in our grab bag ! Rajnish wrote:Why didn't someone warn me that being GM means lots of boring research, logging, testing and organizing data.... I thought it was all about looking cool.... Uthgard Rules \|\| How to connect \|\| FAQ

Austerim Alerion Knight Posts: 2743 Joined: Dec 15, 2010 16:27	by Austerim » Mar 07, 2015 18:33 Trishin wrote:No, and that is the only reason we need. [3:10pm] <myrmidon^> You have to be a c*** to be awesome at daoc [3:10pm] <myrmidon^> that's what I learnt [3:11pm] <Frosty_> then why does austerim suck lordgriffon wrote:Oh by the way... ever seen a group of 8 smite clerics? Or play against a group like that? I have. Absolute devastation. The group that runs up against them can't kill them fast enough because smite clerics have sooooooo many tools at their disposal combined with decent ranged damage with 8 of them dudes doing it!