Warrior vs Berserker
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|
I understand both are needed in grp rvr but I'm interested in how they do in 1on1 fights.. Basically, if i intend to solo sometimes, which class would be a better choice?
|
|
Warrior all the way.
The Berserker's lack of shield spec really hurts it 1v1.
|
|
Warrior > zerk for obv reasons... But zerker is still capable of soloing, imo.
|
|
none of them is capable, u ll be farmed all the way since u cant run away from ppl who outnumber u, which is soo easy. just theory daoc
![]() |
|
Warrior is better choise. He has slam, chain armor, shield..
Zerker only has evade stun, but his evade sux a lot. Well maybe with moparry 5 and composite 50 in parri, could be interesting... |
|
For only melee fights the warrior is better for sure, but imo a bers with charge has more chance to win vs casters
|
|
Imo you can't go solo from time to time. Your RA's need to be either solo specced or grp specced. Wouldn't roll a visible solo char at all it's pointless unless you chose a skald. ![]() <<< This avatar is handmade by Inotor Wurzelbert : ) Check out the Mampfer-Threads for more. viewtopic.php?f=10&t=25079 viewtopic.php?f=10&t=26934 |
|
Im agree with you. Skald has ras that are useless in grooup rvr and solo like purge, sos, aotg. |
|
His post was regarding Warr or Bersi as solo class and RA spec
![]() |
|
Thanks for all of your replies folks...
I am aiming for group rvr at 50 and gonna spec for that purpose.... It's just that I love occasional 1on1 fights when they occur. Also, I might just decide to go full out solo at some point so I wanted to know which of these 2 classes would be more viable for soloing. Anyway, I got my answer and a warrior is in the making! Thanks everyone! |
|
warrior stun block.....
![]() [b][i]"Greetings! Ugmug here, you seem to be a bit lost..."[/i][/b]
|
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests