RvR Statistics end of May2010

Talk about your RvR experience here
User avatar
Kaltess
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 310
Joined: Dec 17, 2009 01:00
Location: France

Postby Kaltess » May 29, 2010 13:33

Runis wrote:
arnius wrote:Mid has gone from leading realm to underdog realm, or is that purely because Hib has many rangers working for them?

Could you make a graphs that shows the average lwrp per realm divided into stealther & non stealther?


that happened because many mids quit playing, and many will quit again with old ra's ( i know some)


It's just that mid is full of kids that only want to play on the "I WIN" realm.Mid is deserted since hib got all reliks,and hib overpopulated...strange.
Fun to see rvr theses last days.When mids get ganked when there's 3fg of each realm in emain,they suddenly diseapears and then,it's 5fg hib and 3 fg alb left...

User avatar
Runis
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 791
Joined: Feb 17, 2007 01:00

Postby Runis » May 29, 2010 18:07

@ Kaltess your statement is false.

Usually when friends play together, if some of them quit, they will all quit. The fact that they did it when hibs got the relics was a coincidence. Also i dont think hibs were able to take the relics if mids were still active.

Maybe a few joined hib, but most of them quit playing except Anguish who plays alb as far as i know. EdN became inactive, also Seraphin and most of GdRW. Without us there is no midgard as u can see.

Trust me, you dont know better than me what happened in midgard, at least until 2 months ago.

Edit: and most of the mids that quit werent kids.

User avatar
Maidrion
Phoenix Knight
 
Posts: 1359
Joined: Jun 10, 2006 00:00

Postby Maidrion » May 29, 2010 18:23

Like Runis said, I don't think the relic situation has anything to do with realm pop. It's just a matter of natural fluctuations. Like, it's perfectly possible that TC and Shangri La would quit and then people will call hib rvr dead again. As the zerg event showed, there's enough people in every realm. As soon as one or two groups from one realm are inactive for a bit, people start ringing the alarm bell.

Runis wrote:@ Kaltess your statement is false.

Usually when friends play together, if some of them quit, they will all quit. The fact that they did it when hibs got the relics was a coincidence. Also i dont think hibs were able to take the relics if mids were still active.

Maybe a few joined hib, but most of them quit playing except Anguish who plays alb as far as i know. EdN became inactive, also Seraphin and most of GdRW. Without us there is no midgard as u can see.

Trust me, you dont know better than me what happened in midgard, at least until 2 months ago.

Edit: and most of the mids that quit werent kids.


As far as I know Anguish hasn't played alb for months, last time I saw em was on mid and that too was atleast two weeks ago. Seemingly just inactive. GdRW still has (semi-)GGs a few times a week.

User avatar
Rector
Alerion Knight
 
Posts: 2744
Joined: Mar 02, 2006 01:00

Postby Rector » May 30, 2010 02:38

Seyha wrote:Rector, would you consider tracking each class's average RR?

I tried this out and it looks like this (data of all 3 weeks):
Image

Not that much interesting I would say. The average realmranks are already similar. And if I do this with the data of 10 weeks or so, they will be pretty even. So I dont think I will continue this one.

User avatar
Kleasion
Warder
 
Posts: 14
Joined: Apr 15, 2010 00:00

Postby Kleasion » May 30, 2010 03:18

Seems not many Spiritmasters RvR. Do Spiritmasters not have the ability to do much RvR? Solo or wanted for groups? Been thinking of making one, but will go Runemaster if not.

User avatar
Ronian
Phoenix Knight
 
Posts: 1556
Joined: Jan 12, 2008 01:00

Postby Ronian » May 30, 2010 03:26

Kleasion wrote:Seems not many Spiritmasters RvR. Do Spiritmasters not have the ability to do much RvR? Solo or wanted for groups? Been thinking of making one, but will go Runemaster if not.


Currently I see more spiritmasters solo and runemasters grouped. For soloing the spiritmaster is the best choice out of the two because of the strong intercept rate and useful aoe and single mezz.

User avatar
Neju
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 893
Joined: Sep 11, 2009 00:00

Postby Neju » May 30, 2010 03:32

Kleasion wrote:Seems not many Spiritmasters RvR. Do Spiritmasters not have the ability to do much RvR? Solo or wanted for groups? Been thinking of making one, but will go Runemaster if not.


spiritmasters are nice for caster groups in my opinion - strong enough spec lifetap, aoe d/q and s/c debuffs, pet for rupts (or for guarding you), pbae to clear theurg pets easy, and back up CC with single mezz, pbae mezz and aoe mezz... very nice class overall even though you lack the imba dps of a dark RM

the main problem you will face is people's attitudes, most people here have pretty narrow views :(
I two-shot Zerkers

User avatar
Ronian
Phoenix Knight
 
Posts: 1556
Joined: Jan 12, 2008 01:00

Postby Ronian » May 30, 2010 03:33

Neju wrote:
Kleasion wrote:Seems not many Spiritmasters RvR. Do Spiritmasters not have the ability to do much RvR? Solo or wanted for groups? Been thinking of making one, but will go Runemaster if not.


spiritmasters are nice for caster groups in my opinion - strong enough spec lifetap, aoe d/q and s/c debuffs, pet for rupts (or for guarding you), pbae to clear theurg pets easy, and back up CC with single mezz, pbae mezz and aoe mezz... very nice class overall even though you lack the imba dps of a dark RM

the main problem you will face is people's attitudes, most people here have pretty narrow views :(


You have to go for splitspec to get all 35 41 ^^

User avatar
Neju
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 893
Joined: Sep 11, 2009 00:00

Postby Neju » May 30, 2010 03:45

nah not needed, resists arent that bad on debuffs (shouldn't be anyway)

low pbae is enough to kill pets
I two-shot Zerkers

User avatar
Phileas
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 370
Joined: Aug 18, 2007 00:00

Postby Phileas » May 30, 2010 03:54

main reason why spiritmasters dont play much in rvr is basically people's attitude... perfect setup and such...
usually the groups that ran with me could see that a SM isnt a bad group char at all
when those people didnt play as much any more (or found out that i have a paci, a zerk and a skald, too ^^) i didnt get as many invites with that char any more

User avatar
Shergo
Guardian
 
Posts: 1
Joined: May 30, 2010 00:00

Postby Shergo » May 30, 2010 14:43

A powerfull setup with a SM is like this! And i know what im talking about, i ran this setup in the guild i founded on Excalibur in the days before TOA came out!

1 pac healer
1 mend healer
1 skald
1 shaman
1 supp rm
2 supp sm's
1 thane/warrior

this setup and u will beat almost everything if u get the right players!

And go for the thane instead of the warrior, since the thane can help do interrupts and ae dmg, then the sm's moves forward to pbaoe, the healer sutns ofc, the RM ae snare dmg, thane ae hammer, sm's pbaoe!

That is very high ae dps tat setup makes, and still a setup there also can beat a tank grp easy!

Zarkor
Unicorn Knight
 
Posts: 3710
Joined: Aug 15, 2006 00:00
Location: Antwerp, Flanders, Belgium

Postby Zarkor » May 30, 2010 14:55

Would be nice if the intercept code on SMs was fixed. :)

Previous

Return to Realm versus Realm

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests

Thursday, 15. May 2025

Artwork and screen shots Copyright © 2001-2004 Mythic Entertainment, Inc. All rights reserved. Used with permission of Mythic Entertainment. Mythic Entertainment, the Mythic Entertainment logo, "Dark Age of Camelot," "Shrouded Isles," "Foundations," "New Frontiers," "Trials of Atlantis," "Catacombs," "Darkness Rising," the Dark Age of Camelot and subsequent logos, and the stylized Celtic knot are trademarks of Mythic Entertainment, Inc.

Valid XHTML & CSS | Original Design by: LernVid.com | Modified by Uthgard Staff