New BG for Level 46/47-49 Chars, max. RR 4L9
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|
Feel free to flame or just vote, if Uthgard should implement such a new Battle Ground for Level 46/47 - 49 Chars. Those Chars can stay there til 4L9, with 5L0 they must leave the BG.
Maybe if the interest is high enough the Staff decides to implement this BG. |
|
If this poll isnt posted by staff its pointless imo
![]() <img src="http://217.86.191.120:81/sig.php?chars=Shien;Sumuran;Silen;Silia;Sinius;Silenius">
|
|
Of course make a bg that destroyes rvr more, to get less ppl in the Agramon area and less RvR for level 50!!
So the answer is no |
|
omg another bg ? then rvr will be more than dead.....from a classic server to a battleground server hrhr....
|
|
which is already ruined ~~
<img src="http://217.86.191.120:81/sig.php?chars=Shien;Sumuran;Silen;Silia;Sinius;Silenius">
|
|
Sry Heinz,but that would be kinda pointless.With RR4 you are absolutly competitiv in NF RvR,and 47-50 is hard but possible EP Grinding.
So the Maineffekt would be that there are less ppl in the Main and Final RvR Area,and you would also split up the Server Population even more,even though many BGs are quite empty at times right atm (not Brae ofc,but Wilton and Thidranki are often dead). Just my 2 Cents, Player of Islana <img src="http://sigtool.covod.org/getImage.php?user=Islana&key=DHKZgbkxJYFMlL">
|
|
If another high BG would ruin the NF RvR, what is it then worth? Think the final goal is to play NF RvR and i dont agree that this would happen - a dead NF. |
|
Even though, it would delay the time until new players arrive there even more than it is already,and as i said,splitting up the population even more is kinda pointless.
<img src="http://sigtool.covod.org/getImage.php?user=Islana&key=DHKZgbkxJYFMlL">
|
|
I dont agree with that. Look at the RR of many new Players. Often you can read '1Lx in Agramon/Emain', though you can get RR4 in Thidranki. For most people Thidranki is only a short stop. I think that would also happen with a new BG. I think those who play twinks would stay there for long and those would also play good RvR in NF with their mains. |
|
sorry heinzi, but BGs are dead allready. theres no sense to level there anymore. most ppl only go there to get the keep and then log or go xping inner realm wheres better grps, better items (or at least even items) more golddrop and better spots.etc.
atm,bgs are senseless and u only can meet enemys at brae,wheres big zergtime since agra. Realm versus Realm means:
Everybody of some Realm, against everyone of the other Realms.. <img src="http://opakwertheim.mine.nu/sig.php?chars=Fortius;Jelhenna;Mhaerion;Elkhas;Kheran;Geneva;Deheaeniera;Kaeron;Throgrus;Colibri;Khalinos;Rhelaine;Kheldan;He |
|
senseless thread , pls close it -.-
We aren´t enough player for a new BG again. Cap 4l9 is too high (around 480k rps) .It takes months in this ares to get it and no ones go more to 50er zone . BGs are also too small ... there will be a lot of zerging ,ganking etc. It should work better to close one of our BGs... i would prefer Wilton |
|
It's an argument not to implement such a bg ![]() |
|
Such a battleground will not be implemented as it is absolutely pointless. You can participate in the NF RvR with level 47.
|
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 50 guests