New BG for Level 46/47-49 Chars, max. RR 4L9

Talk about your RvR experience here

Should Uthgard implement a BG for lvl 46/47-49 Chars, max RR 4L9

YES
7
35%
NO
13
65%
 
Total votes : 20

User avatar
Heinz
Warder
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Mar 17, 2008 01:00

Postby Heinz » Mar 28, 2008 14:48

Feel free to flame or just vote, if Uthgard should implement such a new Battle Ground for Level 46/47 - 49 Chars. Those Chars can stay there til 4L9, with 5L0 they must leave the BG.

Maybe if the interest is high enough the Staff decides to implement this BG.

User avatar
Elwin
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 557
Joined: Jun 11, 2006 00:00
Location: Poland

Postby Elwin » Mar 28, 2008 14:52

If this poll isnt posted by staff its pointless imo :P
<img src="http://217.86.191.120:81/sig.php?chars=Shien;Sumuran;Silen;Silia;Sinius;Silenius">

User avatar
Duke
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 629
Joined: Jan 12, 2006 01:00
Location: MB the Realm 4

Postby Duke » Mar 28, 2008 14:59

Of course make a bg that destroyes rvr more, to get less ppl in the Agramon area and less RvR for level 50!!

So the answer is no

dr_luecke
 

Postby dr_luecke » Mar 28, 2008 15:03

omg another bg ? then rvr will be more than dead.....from a classic server to a battleground server hrhr....

User avatar
Elwin
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 557
Joined: Jun 11, 2006 00:00
Location: Poland

Postby Elwin » Mar 28, 2008 15:15

which is already ruined ~~
<img src="http://217.86.191.120:81/sig.php?chars=Shien;Sumuran;Silen;Silia;Sinius;Silenius">

User avatar
mfassben
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 736
Joined: Jul 23, 2006 00:00

Postby mfassben » Mar 28, 2008 15:31

Sry Heinz,but that would be kinda pointless.With RR4 you are absolutly competitiv in NF RvR,and 47-50 is hard but possible EP Grinding.
So the Maineffekt would be that there are less ppl in the Main and Final RvR Area,and you would also split up the Server Population even more,even though many BGs are quite empty at times right atm (not Brae ofc,but Wilton and Thidranki are often dead).

Just my 2 Cents,
Player of Islana
<img src="http://sigtool.covod.org/getImage.php?user=Islana&key=DHKZgbkxJYFMlL">

User avatar
Heinz
Warder
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Mar 17, 2008 01:00

Postby Heinz » Mar 28, 2008 15:33

Razzer wrote:
Another "high" BG would just ruin NF RvR.


If another high BG would ruin the NF RvR, what is it then worth? Think the final goal is to play NF RvR and i dont agree that this would happen - a dead NF.

User avatar
mfassben
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 736
Joined: Jul 23, 2006 00:00

Postby mfassben » Mar 28, 2008 15:36

Even though, it would delay the time until new players arrive there even more than it is already,and as i said,splitting up the population even more is kinda pointless.
<img src="http://sigtool.covod.org/getImage.php?user=Islana&key=DHKZgbkxJYFMlL">

User avatar
Heinz
Warder
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Mar 17, 2008 01:00

Postby Heinz » Mar 28, 2008 16:08

mfassben wrote:Even though, it would delay the time until new players arrive there even more than it is already,and as i said,splitting up the population even more is kinda pointless.


I dont agree with that. Look at the RR of many new Players. Often you can read '1Lx in Agramon/Emain', though you can get RR4 in Thidranki. For most people Thidranki is only a short stop. I think that would also happen with a new BG. I think those who play twinks would stay there for long and those would also play good RvR in NF with their mains.

User avatar
DanGer666
Phoenix Knight
 
Posts: 1399
Joined: Feb 03, 2006 01:00

Postby DanGer666 » Mar 28, 2008 16:31

sorry heinzi, but BGs are dead allready. theres no sense to level there anymore. most ppl only go there to get the keep and then log or go xping inner realm wheres better grps, better items (or at least even items) more golddrop and better spots.etc.

atm,bgs are senseless and u only can meet enemys at brae,wheres big zergtime since agra.
Realm versus Realm means:
Everybody of some Realm, against everyone of the other Realms..
<img src="http://opakwertheim.mine.nu/sig.php?chars=Fortius;Jelhenna;Mhaerion;Elkhas;Kheran;Geneva;Deheaeniera;Kaeron;Throgrus;Colibri;Khalinos;Rhelaine;Kheldan;He

Rent
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 607
Joined: Aug 22, 2005 00:00

Postby Rent » Mar 28, 2008 16:44

senseless thread , pls close it -.-

We aren´t enough player for a new BG again. Cap 4l9 is too high (around 480k rps) .It takes months in this ares to get it and no ones go more to 50er zone . BGs are also too small ... there will be a lot of zerging ,ganking etc. It should work better to close one of our BGs... i would prefer Wilton

User avatar
Cespx
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 466
Joined: Jun 28, 2007 00:00

Postby Cespx » Mar 28, 2008 17:09

Heinz wrote:I dont agree with that. Look at the RR of many new Players. Often you can read '1Lx in Agramon/Emain', though you can get RR4 in Thidranki. For most people Thidranki is only a short stop. I think that would also happen with a new BG.


It's an argument not to implement such a bg :D

User avatar
Nayru
Developer
Developer
 
Posts: 8834
Joined: Jan 08, 2007 01:00

Postby Nayru » Mar 28, 2008 17:29

Such a battleground will not be implemented as it is absolutely pointless. You can participate in the NF RvR with level 47.


Return to Realm versus Realm

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 50 guests

Friday, 16. May 2025

Artwork and screen shots Copyright © 2001-2004 Mythic Entertainment, Inc. All rights reserved. Used with permission of Mythic Entertainment. Mythic Entertainment, the Mythic Entertainment logo, "Dark Age of Camelot," "Shrouded Isles," "Foundations," "New Frontiers," "Trials of Atlantis," "Catacombs," "Darkness Rising," the Dark Age of Camelot and subsequent logos, and the stylized Celtic knot are trademarks of Mythic Entertainment, Inc.

Valid XHTML & CSS | Original Design by: LernVid.com | Modified by Uthgard Staff