Which NF Zone would you like?

Talk about your RvR experience here

Which map would you like to switch to?

Agramon
49
36%
Odin's Gate
10
7%
Jamtland Mountains
2
1%
Hadrianswall
6
4%
Pennine Mountains
4
3%
Breifine
2
1%
4 Zones (Emain, Agramon, Hadrianswall, Odin's Gate)
53
39%
Emain Macha
10
7%
 
Total votes : 136

User avatar
Nayru
Developer
Developer
 
Posts: 8834
Joined: Jan 08, 2007 01:00

Postby Nayru » Jan 16, 2008 20:59

Image

After the majority (51%) has voted for a "Different NF Zone" we would like to know which zone you would like to switch to. Please note that the result of this poll is not a guarantee that the map with most of all votes will be chosen, as there might be good reasons against it.


---


Image

Nachdem die Mehrheit (51%) für eine andere NF Zone entschieden hat möchten wir wissen, welche Zone ihr gerne als neue RvR Zone nehmen würdet. Beachtet bitte, dass das Ergebnis dieser Umfrage keine Garantie für eine Übernahme der Karte mit den meisten stimmen ist, da gute Gründe dagegen sprechen könnten.


---

Please reply in English! Bitte auf Englisch antworten!

Maps: http://www.tekener.de/maps/

User avatar
silenced
Phoenix Knight
 
Posts: 1074
Joined: Sep 28, 2006 00:00

Postby silenced » Jan 16, 2008 22:49

tbh, pennine is nice -> http://www.camelotherald.com/mapalot/at ... ntains.jpg

much space, open field

for those that like milegates and a symmetric map, i think agramon would be best choice because of it has all it requires: milegates, open field, short ways, space to place different keeps, and, most important about the milegates: all those lame stealthernaps have a good place to farm solo rvr players

ôô

Aragorn
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 749
Joined: Apr 19, 2006 00:00
Location: Kassel

Postby Aragorn » Jan 16, 2008 23:01

Hmn Agramon is to small i guess if you want to place a keep some towers and lvl spots ...

I think Purga had briefine as rvr zone and noone realy liked it (pennine and jamtland would be the same[nearly same map])

Odins and Hadrians would be the same like emain the only difference is thats theres snow in Odins >.<

And 4 zones would be way to big if there are no points we´re the 3 realms could meet each other, but i guess there wouldn´t be many zergs anymore(hope so) and it would be great for the non 50´s

An idea of mine would be to give Agramon Emain Odins and Hadrians an exp bonus so the lows can lvl there and the main rvr would be Agramon but that would be to big again so i have no idea what 2 vote so i don´t vote ^^

°°
[01:18] <[NoXmas]Ara> dann zwing mich mal um rl :)
[01:20] <[Uth]Nayru|away> .d &jail in aragorn
[01:20] <Uthbot> msg: Jailed aragorn in!

Image

User avatar
Gnoraz
Warder
 
Posts: 36
Joined: Apr 12, 2006 00:00

Postby Gnoraz » Jan 17, 2008 10:58

I also guess that the 4 Zones layout would be mmuch too big for uthgard. At the point right now in my view even Emain is a bit too large. You search more than 30 mins sometimes for the Enemy and you cant find him. Maybe Emain is also only low of hot Checkpoints where the grps must walk through. In my opinion Agramon is the best way to go for massive Rvr action ;)
<img src="http://www.metty.the-bart.org/other/daoc/sig.php?name=Anionda&s=37"><img src="http://www.metty.the-bart.org/other/daoc/sig.php?name=Aninchen&s=37">

User avatar
Ipnotik
Myrmidon
 
Posts: 95
Joined: Nov 25, 2007 01:00

Postby Ipnotik » Jan 17, 2008 12:40

Oh my god plz no!

4 zones = impossible to find enemies

agramon = only 1p vs 1p fight, impossible to roam alone




Hold emain zone or change this zone with odin or hadrian.

User avatar
Almar
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 325
Joined: May 11, 2005 00:00

Postby Almar » Jan 17, 2008 12:44

agramon isnt a nf zone its a bg period.


(to prevent quotes and ppl telling me i was wrong the only difference between agramon and a bg is that you can visit other nf zones from it)

and the switch from a half rvr zone (lvl spots excluded) to 4 rvr zones is ridicoulus i cant understand the ppl that vote for this point maybe ppl that want to lvl in the rvr zones and not be found

i dont even get why the staffs thinks of this as a possible solution

User avatar
cloug
Myrmidon
 
Posts: 208
Joined: Mar 04, 2007 01:00

Postby cloug » Jan 17, 2008 13:35

voted agramon . This zone is perfect .
<img src="http://www.fallenearth.fr/daoc/daoc2.php?player=Robine">

User avatar
Blue
Developer
Developer
 
Posts: 15822
Joined: Apr 22, 2005 00:00

Postby Blue » Jan 17, 2008 13:56

@Almar: The difference in fact is that there are 3 gates in Agramon which can simulate OF Emain Milegates. The border zones are only used for TK's at first. Later when population grows we can expand into these zones to introduce more tactical options and relic raids.

User avatar
Rector
Alerion Knight
 
Posts: 2744
Joined: Mar 02, 2006 01:00

Postby Rector » Jan 17, 2008 13:58

that sounds good blue

User avatar
Ipnotik
Myrmidon
 
Posts: 95
Joined: Nov 25, 2007 01:00

Postby Ipnotik » Jan 17, 2008 18:30

damn rvr will sucks in agramon! Only 1p vs 1p, no chance for a solo or a duo.
Hiddens will hide at the walls and kill every group of 3 or 4 ppl.

I think i will leave my lvl 50 char if you choose agramon like rvr zone, and i will use only my bg chars....

User avatar
PNG
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 507
Joined: Sep 03, 2005 00:00

Postby PNG » Jan 17, 2008 18:55

Did you know? The major aspect of the destruction of Purga was the change from Agramon to Breifine or Pennine Mts, i can't exactly remember which zone it was.

And the change of NF-Zones on I50 brought them also a low population...
So be careful...take either Agramon or keep emain...


PNG

User avatar
Murax
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 800
Joined: Mar 13, 2006 01:00

Postby Murax » Jan 17, 2008 19:59

and the switch from a half rvr zone (lvl spots excluded) to 4 rvr zones is ridicoulus i cant understand the ppl that vote for this point maybe ppl that want to lvl in the rvr zones and not be found

i dont even get why the staffs thinks of this as a possible solution


I voted for 4 zones RvR, and i wont level anymore :-)

Calin
Myrmidon
 
Posts: 152
Joined: Sep 13, 2005 00:00
Location: Bremen - Germany

Postby Calin » Jan 17, 2008 20:39

Agramon only will kill every chance to have epic battles, keep fights and a cntinuous rvr population and will lead into instant rvr, zerg action or loggin.
Calin *inactive*

User avatar
Vlare
Warder
 
Posts: 59
Joined: Nov 19, 2007 01:00

Postby Vlare » Jan 17, 2008 20:56

Although this forum is a place to share opinions, Don't threaten staff with "Oh I will leave!". That's just absurd, and a very, very childish way to go about something. At least they're doing it.. Democratically, and are giving you guys the option of having a majority impact on things. So threatening them is useless.

User avatar
Kissy
Warder
 
Posts: 8
Joined: Dec 17, 2007 01:00

Postby Kissy » Jan 17, 2008 21:52

For the 4 zone i think it's not a good thing...

there is not a lot of people in order to RvR in 4 different zone.
It will be very empty.

I would prefere have Old Emain... For a classic server, agramon and NF it's not logical choice....

Kissy

Next

Return to Realm versus Realm

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 48 guests

Friday, 16. May 2025

Artwork and screen shots Copyright © 2001-2004 Mythic Entertainment, Inc. All rights reserved. Used with permission of Mythic Entertainment. Mythic Entertainment, the Mythic Entertainment logo, "Dark Age of Camelot," "Shrouded Isles," "Foundations," "New Frontiers," "Trials of Atlantis," "Catacombs," "Darkness Rising," the Dark Age of Camelot and subsequent logos, and the stylized Celtic knot are trademarks of Mythic Entertainment, Inc.

Valid XHTML & CSS | Original Design by: LernVid.com | Modified by Uthgard Staff