Uthgard • View topic - Proposal for custom change by adding instant porters

Proposal for custom change by adding instant porters

81 posts • Page 2 of 6 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

bruts Myrmidon Posts: 123 Joined: Jan 06, 2017 22:14	Reply with quote by bruts » Oct 21, 2017 23:05 Waiting for Gothis is always a DOWNER! -.-

Voodoo Warder Posts: 22 Joined: May 09, 2017 22:32	Reply with quote by Voodoo » Oct 28, 2017 00:15 I think this is still a valid point, any comments from Devs? Albion <Nothing Special> (ex. <nanana BATMAN>): Lightning - 6l0 theurg Voodoopepew - 4l1 arms Devilmaycare - 3l5 reaver Hibernia <Rebirth> (ex. <Escape>): Voodoopewpew - 5l4 animist Voodoobambam - 3l4 chanter

ZeeZee Warder Posts: 8 Joined: Oct 27, 2017 22:40	Reply with quote by ZeeZee » Oct 28, 2017 01:13 Voodoo wrote:I understand that instant porters in RvR is not a 1.65 feature self-injuring... Uthgard is not full classic-like, graphics are upgraded, lfg tools and prolly more things i forgot to mention. +1 instant RvR port btw.

vadox Banned Posts: 142 Joined: Jan 12, 2013 01:42	Reply with quote by vadox » Oct 28, 2017 02:13 Too late. The Flying Dutchmen is bound to sail forever w/out instant port and players.

oLd-Sneakers Gryphon Knight Posts: 282 Joined: Jun 23, 2009 00:00	Reply with quote by oLd-Sneakers » Oct 30, 2017 12:16 vadox wrote:Too late. The Flying Dutchmen is bound to sail forever w/out instant port and players. We have all died and are now prisoners and bound to play on Uthgard without QoL changes FOREVER

Zob Myrmidon Posts: 77 Joined: Dec 15, 2009 01:00	Reply with quote by Zob » Oct 31, 2017 02:53 NA Eastern Time Primetime

Shadori_xo Warder Posts: 15 Joined: Jun 12, 2017 12:24	Reply with quote by Shadori_xo » Oct 31, 2017 22:45 i cant come up with any arguement that would actually speak against it. would be the same for ALL realms. we can all enjoy the game rather than being afk desktop in case someone in grp misses the port / forgot to put necklace. please do us the favour and reconsider. Hibernia <Carls Computer Club> / <Not Again>: Shadori - Druid Albion <nanana BATMAN>: Nargz - Cleric

pweet Lion Knight Posts: 4243 Joined: Dec 22, 2010 14:07	Reply with quote by pweet » Oct 31, 2017 22:46 got some time to post here. just waited 7mins for port and one in grp missed it. 15min of my life wasted. #snoozgardlife

Abydos Game Master Posts: 6839 Joined: Jan 22, 2011 21:14	Reply with quote by Abydos » Oct 31, 2017 23:07 pweet wrote:got some time to post here. just waited 7mins for port and one in grp missed it. 15min of my life wasted. #snoozgardlife I'm not opposed to this (in fact I pushed for it on Uth1). This is something I'd consider bringing back. But really, in response to this...who's fault is it, really, that you enable such players? Don't hate the game, hate the player :-p

Severian Gryphon Knight Posts: 254 Joined: Mar 01, 2017 19:40	Reply with quote by Severian » Oct 31, 2017 23:29 Are you saying that players who miss ports (whether intentional or accidental) should be ejected from the group? Severian, RR5 Skald Sacrament, RR4 Healer Darkcircle, RR4 RM

Shadori_xo Warder Posts: 15 Joined: Jun 12, 2017 12:24	Reply with quote by Shadori_xo » Oct 31, 2017 23:50 Abydos wrote: pweet wrote:got some time to post here. just waited 7mins for port and one in grp missed it. 15min of my life wasted. #snoozgardlife I'm not opposed to this (in fact I pushed for it on Uth1). This is something I'd consider bringing back. But really, in response to this...who's fault is it, really, that you enable such players? Don't hate the game, hate the player :-p its just one example that can happen. and dont get me wrong. not blaming the game / server for that. it is indeed the players fault.... anyways. sometimes such incidents happen regardless if its the players own fault or not. reinforcing the action in the frontier zones would definitely make the game more fun for all of us and minimize the waiting time! and we all would highly appreciate that! Hibernia <Carls Computer Club> / <Not Again>: Shadori - Druid Albion <nanana BATMAN>: Nargz - Cleric

trademark Myrmidon Posts: 189 Joined: Mar 22, 2017 18:28	Reply with quote by trademark » Oct 31, 2017 23:52 Severian wrote:Are you saying that players who miss ports (whether intentional or accidental) should be ejected from the group? TRIAL BY PORTER! Alainna

pweet Lion Knight Posts: 4243 Joined: Dec 22, 2010 14:07	Reply with quote by pweet » Nov 01, 2017 00:16 well to be fair, today is a very good rvr day anyway keep it up

Abydos Game Master Posts: 6839 Joined: Jan 22, 2011 21:14	Reply with quote by Abydos » Nov 01, 2017 00:28 So I am NA, and in NA time port is pretty much perma 2 min. ANd people still complain that is too long when port is missed. Remember the 7min is half of what the time was originally anyway (15 min). There are ripple effects to everything that do shake to the core of DAOC. Try defending a relic against a zerg that has constant instaport?

pweet Lion Knight Posts: 4243 Joined: Dec 22, 2010 14:07	Reply with quote by pweet » Nov 01, 2017 00:47 i think Uthgard is secretly sponsored by the tabaco industry and thats why we have porter timers.