The Grab Bag is back!

Here you can comment on news articles.
User avatar
dabri0n
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 274
Joined: Jun 11, 2014 09:21
Location: Berlin, GER

Postby dabri0n » Apr 17, 2015 10:30

Koleriker wrote:Is it really that hard to understand that the last bg will end with 1L9 because it was that way at the patch level we are going for?
Stop these WOT's the staffs decision has been made.


The chosen Patch Level is the stone age of DAoC and is a bad decision. Going as far as reimplementing bug from the stone age is just hilarious. I don't see many people play on this server.. You have the Uthgard bonus but once people see how ****** this will be they are just going to leave. Because noone wants to waste time.. unless you have time to waste and then there are better ways..
uwu ~ orz
Image
https://tinyurl.com/y75vcqqm

User avatar
Mhenfhis
Warder
 
Posts: 34
Joined: Jan 22, 2007 01:00

Postby Mhenfhis » Apr 17, 2015 10:35

Juri wrote:No, one account = one client
Also you're not allowed to log in two accounts at the same time, you'll get banned for that (unless you're sharing your IP with other people and those people are playing on their own account)


Well ofc i was talking about 2 persons allways

User avatar
Njor
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 765
Joined: Apr 19, 2010 00:00

Postby Njor » Apr 17, 2015 10:59

dabri0n wrote:...

The chosen Patch Level is the stone age of DAoC and is a bad decision. Going as far as reimplementing bug from the stone age is just hilarious. I don't see many people play on this server.. You have the Uthgard bonus but once people see how ****** this will be they are just going to leave. Because noone wants to waste time.. unless you have time to waste and then there are better ways..


I think you completely misunderstand the idea of this server!
Uthgard and the majority of this community is aiming for this patch level exactly because its not catering for attention span challenged 10 year olds but for people who actually enjoy putting time and effort into their MMORPG experience.

There are many other MMO's out there which are easy, quick to learn, give you instant gratification etc., they might be more to your liking ....even DAoC live could be for you :D

Oswaldo
Phoenix Knight
 
Posts: 1503
Joined: Apr 10, 2011 22:53

Postby Oswaldo » Apr 17, 2015 11:06

Njor wrote:
dabri0n wrote:...

The chosen Patch Level is the stone age of DAoC and is a bad decision. Going as far as reimplementing bug from the stone age is just hilarious. I don't see many people play on this server.. You have the Uthgard bonus but once people see how ****** this will be they are just going to leave. Because noone wants to waste time.. unless you have time to waste and then there are better ways..


I think you completely misunderstand the idea of this server!
Uthgard and the majority of this community is aiming for this patch level exactly because its not catering for attention span challenged 10 year olds but for people who actually enjoy putting time and effort into their MMORPG experience.

There are many other MMO's out there which are easy, quick to learn, give you instant gratification etc., they might be more to your liking ....even DAoC live could be for you :D


Watch out, kids inc to cry about you telling them daoc might not be the right game for them!

When will this stop? oh god..
- Honey Badgers
- Winkz

User avatar
Skarz
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 417
Joined: Apr 11, 2007 00:00

Postby Skarz » Apr 17, 2015 12:54

just face the facts already haters.

daoc is 12 years old and live servers are STILL running.

majority of the whole daoc community both freeshard and live all agree that daoc is going downhill since EA took over. most of us agree the best days were classic and SI.

that being said most of us activly seek a way to play classic / si again and over the last 5 years all freeshard custom servers lost all population due to mass commitment to uthgard.

as i have said and others also many many times, decisions have been made. most of the decisions are actualy very old ones and never been a secret. uthgard is a classic / livelike server. they promise never to release expansions such as toa +++

now tell me why some of u have the cheek to come here and demand custom implementations u are used to, or see it as being a better way of daoc so u expect to be heard.

i personaly want to play dark age of camelot (classic / si ).............. not new age of sh i talot ( custom made by relvivian )


p.s the daoc's atmosphere is created by EVERY detail and mechanic both game changing and tiny down to simple textures.

u actualy cannot change a single thing and expect to have the same result. any and all changes result in a different end game atmosphere and will present new / unwanted challenges / hurdles to overcome.

comes bk to my origonal point. why change a successful game, why change aspects of a game we all activly seek to play.
Last edited by Skarz on Apr 17, 2015 13:09, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
dabri0n
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 274
Joined: Jun 11, 2014 09:21
Location: Berlin, GER

Postby dabri0n » Apr 17, 2015 13:07

Njor wrote:
dabri0n wrote:...

The chosen Patch Level is the stone age of DAoC and is a bad decision. Going as far as reimplementing bug from the stone age is just hilarious. I don't see many people play on this server.. You have the Uthgard bonus but once people see how ****** this will be they are just going to leave. Because noone wants to waste time.. unless you have time to waste and then there are better ways..


I think you completely misunderstand the idea of this server!
Uthgard and the majority of this community is aiming for this patch level exactly because its not catering for attention span challenged 10 year olds but for people who actually enjoy putting time and effort into their MMORPG experience.

There are many other MMO's out there which are easy, quick to learn, give you instant gratification etc., they might be more to your liking ....even DAoC live could be for you :D


Why the hate ;) I am just saying what everyone thinks or will be thinking. If you dont remember how bad DAoC was pre 2004 you will be reminded *if* this server ever comes back. I know there are other MMOs available and I am not a fan of theme park mmo's.

Coming back to my earlier point, why would you try to mindlessly target a patch level, knowing all its flaws and lackings that have been cure in later patches? My understanding is that the majority of players doesn't like ToA and EA content and perhaps wants to play OF. No need to bring all the bullshit realm abilities and broken classes from 2004 back.. Might get several month of fun out of it while everyone levels though.. then this will collapse, we will see. You heard it here first ;)

p.s.: I have no idea what all this has to do with the attention span of juveniles?
uwu ~ orz
Image
https://tinyurl.com/y75vcqqm

User avatar
Skarz
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 417
Joined: Apr 11, 2007 00:00

Postby Skarz » Apr 17, 2015 13:15

help me understand why u are here when u see daoc pre 2004 as a bad game ?

i also think some of the cures u speak of are the destructive changes alot of this community dislikes about live.

User avatar
dabri0n
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 274
Joined: Jun 11, 2014 09:21
Location: Berlin, GER

Postby dabri0n » Apr 17, 2015 13:24

There is a possibility that most of the freeshard crowd will hop on this dead horse.. i guess i will be one of them if it happens.

And I don't see DAoC as a bad game. DAoC 2004 and the OF patches were the suck when you compared to the 1.7x/1.8x area on the non-toa servers. Not comparing to live.. today, thats very different game. It just doesn't make sense to play old RAs and broken classes again. Old Keeps, porter ceremonies, 30min RA timers (which are actually ok if you have to wait for fights 20min on average), un-groupable hybrid classes, no shears, no ns-cure. Any person with half a brain will play hib, some will go alb with still have enough cheese only they need to earn the RP first. mids will bath in a constant stream of tears.

I guess we just have a very different appreciation of fun and balance.
Last edited by dabri0n on Apr 17, 2015 13:44, edited 1 time in total.
uwu ~ orz
Image
https://tinyurl.com/y75vcqqm

User avatar
silenced
Phoenix Knight
 
Posts: 1074
Joined: Sep 28, 2006 00:00

Postby silenced » Apr 17, 2015 13:41

Oswaldo wrote:Watch out, kids inc to cry about you telling them daoc might not be the right game for them!

When will this stop? oh god..


I see you're rather new here, so, maybe ... DAoC is not the right game for you.


For all those that do not like he patch level they're aiming for: You do not have to play on Uthgard. It's your VERY own decision to play on Uthgard. If you are even unable to accept your very own decisions, well, try something else. You do not have to like it, sure, but complaining about all the time is not the right way either. In the end you'll be here anyways, since there's no better alternative server.
Albion Forever!

User avatar
Skarz
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 417
Joined: Apr 11, 2007 00:00

Postby Skarz » Apr 17, 2015 13:47

why are u comparing classic / si with later patch lvls anyways ?

its no secret i want a 100% livelike 0% custom server classic / si server to play on. its my prefered expansion of daoc.

but i liked many aspect of later daoc. and hated many aspects also. i could easily sit here and argue along side u how some of uthgard is gonna be ****** vs some of live aspects, but we all know there is nothing constructive to come of this discussion whilst custom is not on the table.

i will say it again.... uthgard wants classic / si patch level

uthgards doors are closed to custom implementations

User avatar
Mhenfhis
Warder
 
Posts: 34
Joined: Jan 22, 2007 01:00

Postby Mhenfhis » Apr 17, 2015 13:52

Well complaining and this endless discussions, at this lvl with no insults etc.. help a bit to kill the time of waiting :D, i think it good to community and keep the dream of the server alive while we wait :D

User avatar
Skarz
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 417
Joined: Apr 11, 2007 00:00

Postby Skarz » Apr 17, 2015 13:54

i agree having a debate on this subject is ok and even healthy but when some expect actual changes and idea's to be implemented its worrying, and shouldnt take place here.

User avatar
Mhenfhis
Warder
 
Posts: 34
Joined: Jan 22, 2007 01:00

Postby Mhenfhis » Apr 17, 2015 14:12

Skarz wrote:i agree having a debate on this subject is ok and even healthy but when some expect actual changes and idea's to be implemented its worrying, and shouldnt take place here.


Well he is trying to fight ppl Nostalgia, kinda the harderst enemie of server, DAoC and if you look futhermore... Camelot Unchained.

I think in somepoints he is right and you must agree, but as you said shouldnt be here.. maybe in other post with suggestions :D.

User avatar
Satiah
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 690
Joined: Jun 30, 2012 15:14

Postby Satiah » Apr 17, 2015 14:53

Skarz wrote:i agree having a debate on this subject is ok and even healthy



Skarz wrote:
Satiah wrote:
Skarz wrote:server revamp topic since revamp begun total post = 4137


Bla bla bla bla bla bla

Scalado wrote:The majority in this thread is speaking in favour of the BG change.


Bla bla bla bla bla bla



??????????????????

take ur head out ur ass next time u speak please.


I see what you call an healthy debate. Well done.


Skarz wrote:if u want casual pug fun from time to time and ur grp has both a bad setup and mix of players then u realy cannot expect any success, only the thrill of rvr.


So basically you are admitting that there is no room for a casual pug on Uthgard. That's exactly what people are trying to tell you. Without that fun, people won't come to RvR at all. You can refuse to see this fact, but it will mean that RvR dies out pretty soon and you'll be left with an empty server again.
Satiah | Tuthmes | Dendera | Khufu | Nefertete | Dahshur | Nebetah | Neterbaiu

User avatar
Skarz
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 417
Joined: Apr 11, 2007 00:00

Postby Skarz » Apr 17, 2015 15:01

lol talk about seeing what u want,

they were examples on u and ur options.

u want success with no effort, get a grip plz

PreviousNext

Return to News

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests

Monday, 23. June 2025

Artwork and screen shots Copyright © 2001-2004 Mythic Entertainment, Inc. All rights reserved. Used with permission of Mythic Entertainment. Mythic Entertainment, the Mythic Entertainment logo, "Dark Age of Camelot," "Shrouded Isles," "Foundations," "New Frontiers," "Trials of Atlantis," "Catacombs," "Darkness Rising," the Dark Age of Camelot and subsequent logos, and the stylized Celtic knot are trademarks of Mythic Entertainment, Inc.

Valid XHTML & CSS | Original Design by: LernVid.com | Modified by Uthgard Staff