Ciubhran wrote:What's a hypotenuse?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypotenuse


Should I assume that the increase in unrelated questions like this is because you can't think of any more questions?

Trishin wrote:

Ciubhran wrote:What's a hypotenuse?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypotenuse


Should I assume that the increase in unrelated questions like this is because you can't think of any more questions?

You're fired.

1) How are you going to manage multibox players? (for multibox i intend also just a buffbot to boost xp)
2) How are you going to going to get rid of xrealmers without using a trojan?
3) It's a fact that Uthgard isn't an official server and so cant reach livelike palyers number. Said this have you any plan to force (gracefully) players to focus on rvr?
4) Along with question n°3 assumption: are you open to discuss and implemnt some custom routines asked by players?

Thanks

Riverseeker wrote:1) How are you going to manage multibox players? (for multibox i intend also just a buffbot to boost xp)

You can see how many accounts are logged in via the same IP adress, so, more than one account logged in -> someone will come to investigate. Having several IP adresses at hand is another story ...

I'd like to know:

1. Will the hybrid classes get determination, thanes/vw's etc? Was great on Uthgard when they could as it made RvR grps more diverse.

2. Do you have a rough ETA as to your beta and/or release date?

3. I am assuming it is a complete re-roll for names/chars/RR's etc. Are you able to confirm this?

How are you planning to get the good quality RvR of Daoc first years? Are you going to make buffers classes useful again, and controlled by players? not buffbots, if the answer is yes, do you guys plan to NOT implement pots and barrels?

Yay, grab bag is back!

How will you handle 2 players playing from the same IP address?
(my wife and I will both be playing on Uthgard...)

cheers

YuzoKoshiro wrote:How are you planning to get the good quality RvR of Daoc first years? Are you going to make buffers classes useful again, and controlled by players? not buffbots, if the answer is yes, do you guys plan to NOT implement pots and barrels?

Buff classes have always been useful even on live with Buffbots, stop this nonsense. To answer your question without having to waste trishins time, buffbots are not allowed and Yes there will be single pots(no barrels).

Njor wrote:Yay, grab bag is back!

How will you handle 2 players playing from the same IP address?
(my wife and I will both be playing on Uthgard...)

cheers

On Uthgard 1.0 this was never a problem. They have "ways" to test if it is really 2 people playing that only 2 human beings can pass. Its pretty easy to tell who is botting and who isnt, and the staff stays on top of it.

On 2.0 they may have new methods as well...

Seksy wrote: Buff classes have always been useful even on live with Buffbots, stop this nonsense. To answer your question without having to waste trishins time, buffbots are not allowed and Yes there will be single pots(no barrels).

I'm pretty sure anyone who asks this question hasn't RvRed much at all. You can't replace 2 Clerics with potions.

Please feel free to answer questions you know the answer to (such as the ones that has already been answered in our gallery or other news posts). However please keep it nice as not everyone reads everything on the forum. No questions are stupid here.

Do you implement capital porters to border keeps ? Cause no SI at start and i remember some thread in downgrade section

Will you implement an account vault?

(will be very usefull with single pots...)

aidoru wrote:...
- About the vault, will be available an account one that shares the items with the characters in that account ?..

This has already been asked. Thanks for submitting your question though.

Trishin wrote:No questions are stupid here.

In this case, I'm safe ^^

About pets :

will pet continue to follow the target even if this will hide ?

Thanks for reading,
good day to all.