Uthgard • View topic - Work in progress (we're still alive!)

Work in progress (we're still alive!)

625 posts • Page 15 of 42 • 1 ... 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 ... 42

Baman Myrmidon Posts: 103 Joined: Feb 26, 2010 01:00	by Baman » Aug 22, 2014 16:03 Oswaldo wrote:Maybe give xp bonus to those who stay on one realm? increased rps or something? That might help people to stay on one realm i guess... Just let people only play one realm.

GreenP Phoenix Knight Posts: 1305 Joined: Sep 07, 2008 00:00	by GreenP » Aug 22, 2014 16:05 Give 30% xpbonus for people that playing 1 realm at least 1month straight, 15% for 2 realms 0% for 3 ! Formerly known as Touareg- RR10 noobVW on Uth1. Crossfire- RR7 noobAnimist on Uth1. Ohnoes- RR9 noobAnimist on Lolgins. Click this LINK if you want to see the truth about Hibernia

Oswaldo Phoenix Knight Posts: 1503 Joined: Apr 10, 2011 22:53	by Oswaldo » Aug 22, 2014 16:58 Baman wrote: Oswaldo wrote:Maybe give xp bonus to those who stay on one realm? increased rps or something? That might help people to stay on one realm i guess... Just let people only play one realm. Cant be done.. We have alrdy been over this. Theres nothing Uthgard GMs can do to prevent people from playing other realms... ... Anyways there wont be any "x-realming" for the first 2-3 months anyhow.. And hey who knows, maybe there will be some realm pride now, considering it's going to be way harder to get rvr rdy on your first toon, than it was before. - Honey Badgers - Winkz

Seksy Eagle Knight Posts: 922 Joined: Nov 21, 2012 08:44	by Seksy » Aug 22, 2014 19:53 Cross realm is something to hard to control, I say we just setup a 30min-1hour IP lock for relic purposes and call it a day. Edit : or don't do anything.

Baman Myrmidon Posts: 103 Joined: Feb 26, 2010 01:00	by Baman » Aug 22, 2014 20:27 Oswaldo wrote: Baman wrote: Oswaldo wrote:Maybe give xp bonus to those who stay on one realm? increased rps or something? That might help people to stay on one realm i guess... Just let people only play one realm. Cant be done.. We have alrdy been over this. Theres nothing Uthgard GMs can do to prevent people from playing other realms...

Lucifire Gryphon Knight Posts: 390 Joined: Dec 10, 2010 04:47	by Lucifire » Aug 22, 2014 21:00 PS - I know Blue is alive because he keeps accepting my 25 USD a month donations. Nice man!

Seksy Eagle Knight Posts: 922 Joined: Nov 21, 2012 08:44	by Seksy » Aug 22, 2014 21:35 I think with the exp fix which fixes group and PL experience, It should be a huge improvement from Uthgard 1.0.

Austerim Alerion Knight Posts: 2743 Joined: Dec 15, 2010 16:27	by Austerim » Aug 22, 2014 22:28 Seksy wrote:I think with the exp fix which fixes group and PL experience, It should be a huge improvement from Uthgard 1.0. Highly doubt we'll get a huge group bonus like Genesis has though. [3:10pm] <myrmidon^> You have to be a c*** to be awesome at daoc [3:10pm] <myrmidon^> that's what I learnt [3:11pm] <Frosty_> then why does austerim suck lordgriffon wrote:Oh by the way... ever seen a group of 8 smite clerics? Or play against a group like that? I have. Absolute devastation. The group that runs up against them can't kill them fast enough because smite clerics have sooooooo many tools at their disposal combined with decent ranged damage with 8 of them dudes doing it!

Seksy Eagle Knight Posts: 922 Joined: Nov 21, 2012 08:44	by Seksy » Aug 22, 2014 23:21 Yeah but even the old Uthgard experience rate wasn't so bad, At least when you hit 50 it felt like you accomplished something. At least now with PL just make sure to make some friends .

Scrooge Myrmidon Posts: 85 Joined: Mar 22, 2007 01:00	by Scrooge » Aug 23, 2014 00:11 Personally I believe that if Uthgard would become a chronologically progressive server (though alot more rapid than it was on live,) it'd be alot closer to the 'classic experience' than it ever was before, not to mention alot more fun! For example, they'd start at a certain earlier patch (say 1.35 for instance) and content, and over time introduce 'newer' content after, until it would reach it's goal of 1.65 or whatever patch the staff decide to end it. OR The server starts out with classic pre-SI content, no SI classes/features/perks (this would mean no SI/Alchemy either) for like the first 1-2 months (or whatever the staff decides,) and then afterwards introduce the SI content they've been working on all at once. This way maybe the Staff can release the server much earlier, and just activate the SI content whenever they feel it's ready. If anyone here played on the classic Everquest server, Project1999, it was a great example of such a 'framework' for a classic server - starting with classic only content and over time introduce 'newer' zones and eventually the first expansion, Ruins of Kunark. That's how they're currently still working on the second expansion, by having a separate "beta server" to test things on, while leaving the main server active. This idea of a progressive server was so popular that SOE (Sony Online Entertainment) decided to make a pair of 'progressive live servers' reflecting on the success of a private server like Project1999. Let me know what you all think about suggesting this idea to the staff, would appreciate everyone's support if you happen to agree with this concept of a classic server. Scrooge <Insanity> Vondas <Fury>

Mancav3 Myrmidon Posts: 139 Joined: Jun 25, 2014 15:06	by Mancav3 » Aug 23, 2014 01:16 Personally, I believe if it would release we could play it. [url=https://www.cialispascherfr24.com/]link[/url]

Seksy Eagle Knight Posts: 922 Joined: Nov 21, 2012 08:44	by Seksy » Aug 23, 2014 03:38 -I'd say fix the endgame drop from SI, or at least make the content to hard until it's ready. -Make sure old RA's are (somewhat) working. -Si classes like necro+bd fixed. Honestly anything else can be fixed along the way, but I know this wont be accepted by the staff. I myself would want to bring something that is impressive and surpasses any competition. Taking longer and bringing out a A+ server gives good impressions on the newer players. I don't think Uthgard staff wants the same reputation as Origins.

Jerrian Phoenix Knight Posts: 1430 Joined: Jan 21, 2010 01:00	by Jerrian » Aug 23, 2014 08:53 Seksy wrote:-I'd say fix the endgame drop from SI, or at least make the content to hard until it's ready. -Make sure old RA's are (somewhat) working. -Si classes like necro+bd fixed. Honestly anything else can be fixed along the way, but I know this wont be accepted by the staff. I myself would want to bring something that is impressive and surpasses any competition. Taking longer and bringing out a A+ server gives good impressions on the newer players. I don't think Uthgard staff wants the same reputation as Origins. Hmm, I would prefer to open Uthgard as a test server with a complete rollback when it finally releases.It could help to find bugs and it would be better then any news, because we are part of the progress. You could make the server PvP for this time too, for fun, So ppl can kill each other instead of posting bored in this forum :-D . I really wonder why staff not considering this as an option. Anyway, I´m against a final release attempt when the major bugs/patch goals are not complete finished, I don ´t wanna see a nerf-daoc periode like it was at Uthgard 1.0 again.

Salidor Eagle Knight Posts: 526 Joined: May 02, 2007 00:00 Location: USA	by Salidor » Aug 23, 2014 17:24 Jerrian wrote: Seksy wrote:-I'd say fix the endgame drop from SI, or at least make the content to hard until it's ready. -Make sure old RA's are (somewhat) working. -Si classes like necro+bd fixed. Honestly anything else can be fixed along the way, but I know this wont be accepted by the staff. I myself would want to bring something that is impressive and surpasses any competition. Taking longer and bringing out a A+ server gives good impressions on the newer players. I don't think Uthgard staff wants the same reputation as Origins. Hmm, I would prefer to open Uthgard as a test server with a complete rollback when it finally releases.It could help to find bugs and it would be better then any news, because we are part of the progress. You could make the server PvP for this time too, for fun, So ppl can kill each other instead of posting bored in this forum :-D . I really wonder why staff not considering this as an option. Anyway, I´m against a final release attempt when the major bugs/patch goals are not complete finished, I don ´t wanna see a nerf-daoc periode like it was at Uthgard 1.0 again. i 2nd that ^^ making it a bata server for a few months is a good idea imo

Austerim Alerion Knight Posts: 2743 Joined: Dec 15, 2010 16:27	by Austerim » Aug 23, 2014 17:30 Do it once and do it right! [3:10pm] <myrmidon^> You have to be a c*** to be awesome at daoc [3:10pm] <myrmidon^> that's what I learnt [3:11pm] <Frosty_> then why does austerim suck lordgriffon wrote:Oh by the way... ever seen a group of 8 smite clerics? Or play against a group like that? I have. Absolute devastation. The group that runs up against them can't kill them fast enough because smite clerics have sooooooo many tools at their disposal combined with decent ranged damage with 8 of them dudes doing it!