pweet wrote:

[R]Bloodwyne wrote:i think the main reason people play albion is because albion has the theurgist and everyoen knows having a theurgist in your group means instawin

with equal player skill

lol skill? why would u need skill for albion.. theurgist 2 button instawin gogo

I know that we (my guild and I) rolled alb because they were the lowest pop... everytime we ran thid on our mids only hibs n mids out, never any albs... We plan to eventually be set up on all 3 realms so we can play the low-pop/underdog realm at all times.... We do it because we enjoy the challenge.


Whichever realm I am playing on at the time I am "For the Realm" So get ready for albs to get our Relics back

Vlalkor wrote:Whichever realm I am playing on at the time I am "For the Realm" So get ready for albs to get our Relics back

Please don't even think about getting the relics back! Let the hibbies keep them!

[R]Bloodwyne wrote:lol skill? why would u need skill for albion.. theurgist 2 button instawin gogo

Want to book 1 day seminar on which two buttons to use and how to use them efficiently!

Every donkey can play Theurg.

Xacrag wrote:Every donkey can play Theurg.

That makes every Theurgist an ass!

LOLOLLOLLOLOLOLL

Xacrag wrote:Every donkey can play Theurg.

I could give you a list of names who would fit that role

I would appreciate this list.

most idiotic thing i've ever heard. eld or rm are way easier to play. wanna know why? in the normal alb setups, theurgist is so constantly under pressure that it is hard to do anything besides conc3/qc. further, those off-tanks dont have to fear to die like mercs have if they go too deep for elds/rms. so they just stick/focus the theurgist the whole fight, kinda easy if u ask me. so it becomes even more critical what you do with a theurgist with every cast u are offered. / you have to harness every mistake the enemy does to be fully effective.

eld / rms have a much higher failure tolerance.

i know its mostly an alb problem with flawed setups and bad def tanks. nevertheless, playing a theurgist at the moment, is harder then eld / rm. or do you REALLY think that the amount of keys you have to push on a char determines if its hard to play or not? i doubt that. i mean there is a reason why there are 1-2 good theurgist and well, the rest of them.

if im not mistaken you actualyl agreed on that one when u played eld last weekend. "most chilled job in the world" for hib backline. and iirc, the theurg in that alb group was your rm. i am wodnering why rm works and yet he was so uneffective on the ridiculously easy theurg.

shintari wrote:most idiotic thing i've ever heard. eld or rm are way easier to play. wanna know why? in the normal alb setups, theurgist is so constantly under pressure that it is hard to do anything besides conc3/qc. further, those off-tanks dont have to fear to die like mercs have if they go too deep for elds/rms. so they just stick/focus the theurgist the whole fight, kinda easy if u ask me. so it becomes even more critical what you do with a theurgist with every cast u are offered. / you have to harness every mistake the enemy does to be fully effective.

eld / rms have a much higher failure tolerance.

i know its mostly an alb problem with flawed setups and bad def tanks. nevertheless, playing a theurgist at the moment, is harder then eld / rm. or do you REALLY think that the amount of keys you have to push on a char determines if its hard to play or not? i doubt that. i mean there is a reason why there are 1-2 good theurgist and well, the rest of them.

if im not mistaken you actualyl agreed on that one when u played eld last weekend. "most chilled job in the world" for hib backline.

You'd have to be really bad to completley fail on a theurg, you can do almost nothing and still fullfil your role decently. Highlvl play is different, but its hard to ****** basic theurg play up.

disagree. because there are so few options on the theurg, mastering and f/cking it up can be a very close call. theurgist is considered key to success or failure if im not mistaken. just see my added sentence in the previous post. apparently players who are considered good on rm (maybe, i dont know) cant handle the theurgist at all. just saying, that theurg is not about his. really demands skill to do the right thing in the really rare moments you get the chance to do something.

shintari wrote:disagree. because there are so few options on the theurg, mastering and f/cking it up can be a very close call. theurgist is considered key to success or failure if im not mistaken. just see my added sentence in the previous post. apparently players who are considered good on rm (maybe, i dont know) cant handle the theurgist at all. just saying, that theurg is not about his. really demands skill to do the right thing in the really rare moments you get the chance to do something.

A bad runie does nothing in a fight. A bad theurg is still annoying as long as he manages to get 1-2 pets out.

The 2 pets of doom!

ZaiQQ wrote:
A bad runie does nothing in a fight. A bad theurg is still annoying as long as he manages to get 1-2 pets out.

This is the point, indeed

so the point of this thread is to compare bad players with bad players and their effect on the group? hmmkay hf then^^