Blue wrote:I can only tell you that Uthgard growthrates came from one single source which was tested by one person that time. Mixing different sources with different test approaches is not the right solution.

Also you cant just compare growthrates. The Utility of styles is made of penaltys and bonuses.

Zippity once made a list of growthrate sources. http://talsyra.tripod.com/daocmechanics ... owths.html We could change all styles to use these listed GR.

WIll growth rates for other classes also be ajusted to these values?

I let it up to others to point to large differences between the "source" and Uthgard. Its a time consuming task to change all values.

Blue wrote:I let it up to others to point to large differences between the "source" and Uthgard. Its a time consuming task to change all values.

Blue, you Might want to start with this one...

http://uthgard.net/index.php?option=com ... yle+report

After Mobdmg-Fix, i'd like to push up a thread, even it's an old one

My Hunter is lvl 50, used the 32 BC pet. I only did a very few tests against the doll. So Uthgard-tests are from accurate but it should do the trick and GMs can look into sourcecode anyway.

- Unbuffed the pet hit's the doll for avg 35dmg.
- With lvl24 str/con (petbuff, +29str/con) dmg gets up 57 or something like that.

Even with highest pet buff (+42) i can't image dmg goes up to min dmg of 71(-19) [should be 90 to doll] and max dmg of 114(-30) [should be 143 to doll]-

I play Alb nowadays, but any chance a GM can take a look? Hunters deserve a boost and with the proof from "back in the days" the Hunter's Avatar is seems treated somehow special.

wanted to make hunter ... no longer sure when reading this .... i gues im better of with an ranger----

google found this topic.....

Seems in uthgard 2.0 hunter pet damage still crap.