Battlegruonds need real keep lords
56 posts
• Page 4 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4
|
i don't think the braemar lord needs to be higher - it's more a problem with the Lord AI and guardian AI which is somewhat buggy in general and allows to easily trick them to defeat them.. but i won't go deeper into such matters.
The Wilton Lord really could be a bit higher, though, he cons orange up from level 36.. Braemar lord is purple to most levels till 30 so he's really hard and will beat the crap out of you unless you really know what you are doing solo... <img src="http://www.fallenearth.fr/daoc/daoc2.php?player=Thraxia" />
|
|
Maybe it would be possible for the Uthgard admins to monitor the realm preference (actually I'm pretty sure a perl script and the server log files would do the trick). Would be nice if we could see some statistics.
As for the balance. I played in Albion more than a year ago. There were always more than enough players for groups, but they worked against each other most of the time ("get lost, this is my kill..."). So I switched to Midgard and wasn't disappointed so far. Okay, I very seldom saw Midgard having the same number of players in any battle ground than Albion does, but I've grown used to playing undernumbered. Maybe I always log in at the wrong moment? Quite possible. No real telling without automatic monitoring. Anyway. Keep-Lords are okay as they are. 4 Chars take round about 1:30 minutes to kill the Lord, which is more then enough time to rush them, while they are at it. So if it is possible realm balance statistics would be very interesting, but I know, the Uthgard staff has a lot to do, so this is more kind of a nice-to-have out of curiosity. By the way: Comparing Uthgard to the live server is not always a good thing, because there are a lot of things that are much better on Uthgard (e.g. no overpowered Cata-Classes, no endless leveling to keep you paying). Just think about it. I like playing here, and after all ---- it's just a game! |
|
i thought i saw such statistic on this forum .....
<img src="http://217.86.191.120:81/sig.php?chars=Shien;Sumuran;Silen;Silia;Sinius;Silenius">
|
|
asdf
![]() ![]() |
|
why are u bumping such an outdated and ridiculous thread? o_O Genuine Spirit Cabalist since 2002
|
|
Because he wanted to remind me to post... We duo-ed Braemar Lord yesterday!! ![]() Reaver 33 and Ice-Theurg 35 Ex-Albion-Logres: Bogner [Sankaras Erben] and co Ex-Camlann: Dirtymind [FEAR] and Stinkerle ![]() |
|
a block bot and a pet spammer... you do surprise me.
![]() |
|
Hey! Please.... "sexy block bot" ![]() Ex-Albion-Logres: Bogner [Sankaras Erben] and co Ex-Camlann: Dirtymind [FEAR] and Stinkerle ![]() |
|
I ALMOST soloed him on my VW.. got him to 20% pretty easily but then he spams heals, they seem to work through disease(bug ).. got him to like 5-10% solo then died
Jaysun - Valewalker
|
|
with my caby i got the braemar-lord quite low the other day too, but then i ran out of mana and he stayed at like 10% ![]() however, that topic SO outdated...i wonder why it wasnt closed right after bumping it...6 years! Genuine Spirit Cabalist since 2002
|
|
Even if discussions are useless about this topic, it's impossible to solo a lord in Braemer.
For casters, you will get out of mana, for tank, you will not be able to hit him over his perma heal. Duo is doable, but even not so easy, because it depends on classes (like said above, theu and blockbot). ![]() >>> Please click here and Save the Pandas! They need us! They need you! <<<
Best Realm Rank will be 1L1 ! |
56 posts
• Page 4 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 57 guests