sidestyle with effect stun

If you need support, you can get help here!
User avatar
Meander Silberberg
Myrmidon
 
Posts: 160
Joined: Jul 03, 2012 15:11

Postby Meander Silberberg » May 28, 2013 17:02

rangers can hit me from the front with their sidestyle (+stun). But it's a SIDEstyle. Please fix this issue asap.
And no, i did not attack them in melee mode. it's not the afterevade style.

User avatar
Xacrag
Phoenix Knight
 
Posts: 1037
Joined: Jan 17, 2010 01:00
Location: Austria

Postby Xacrag » May 28, 2013 17:04

Nice Report .... NOT, its due too the game mechanics possbile if they strafe here on Uthgard.

Won´t be fixed anyway.
[R]Bloodwyne wrote:10p wer xacrag zum heulen bringt

mdocod
Warder
 
Posts: 49
Joined: Feb 12, 2013 19:32

Postby mdocod » May 28, 2013 18:12

I have a special name for this common exploit: The Uthdrop ;)

I have had people on uthgard tell me that they used to do this to people on live all the time, however, I did a lot of meelee 'training/experimentation' in duels in my live days many years ago and recall specifically that /face could not be effectively circumvented with any amount of dancing that we tried.

Possible reasons this is different on Uthgard:

1. Live may have forwarded which characters were /facing who to clients. This would mean that the only time that /face could be circumvented would be in the first round of latency from when /face is chosen to when the clients of opponents are made aware of this.

2. Live may have had lower client-server-client round-trip latency. By a margin for most players significant enough to make the 'Uthdrop' much more difficult to exploit or near impossible.

3. Live has or has had ghosting of sorts. My understanding is that ghosting is effectively a way to 'correct' for incorrect position/facing information from 'the past' on another client. Uthgard has eliminated ghosting, which may have the unintended consequence of making the 'uthdrop' easier to exploit, since there is no 'fixing the past' going on.

------------------

What troubles me most about this particular 'bug' (if you want to call it that), is not that it does exsist, but that people choose to exploit it. It tells me that there are a number of people who play on uthgard who are more interested in winning/farming by any means possible (exploit or not), than having an honest fight.

My suggestion is as follows: if a ranger exploits the side position stun against your latency, return the favor with an exploited slam-drop.

Personally, what i like to try to do, is get an honest stun landed through my opponents front arc defenses, then move to a positional snare, or perform a combination snare or reactionary snare.. basically my goal in meelee is to snare the opponent in a legitimate fashion (I could lag-drop a snare just like they are trying to lag-drop a stun but then I only get RPs and no satisfaction) the result of which is that they can not exploit the uthdrop because they can't move fast enough to exploit it.

Regards,
Eric

User avatar
Lucifire
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 390
Joined: Dec 10, 2010 04:47

Postby Lucifire » May 28, 2013 19:00

Don't worry about rangers, you just need to accept they are the alpha-class. The rest of the classes will be nerfed/are nerfed and they will continue strong.
Image
Image

User avatar
Jezzmin
Phoenix Knight
 
Posts: 1602
Joined: Mar 11, 2010 01:00

Postby Jezzmin » May 29, 2013 09:50

mdocod wrote:1. Live may have forwarded which characters were /facing who to clients. This would mean that the only time that /face could be circumvented would be in the first round of latency from when /face is chosen to when the clients of opponents are made aware of this.


wow, this seems to be a VERY good way of fixing this...even if you wouldn't say you tested that /face couldn't be side-styled on live this would be a very good way to avoid side or back styles...and would also allow casters for melee-/face their targets and avoid the annoying run-through-out-of-sight-thing...

vote for this to be implemented on uth...problem is, that the clients would have to be changed, which would make it impossible to do this...

other idea: the server needs to flag a player's /face-target...and if some1 lands a side/back style on a target then the server should check for the targets face-target first...if side-styler and victims face-target are the same -> fail on sidestyle...
Genuine Spirit Cabalist since 2002

Magicco wrote:i would give my live acc data only to trustworthy ppl like jezzmin

User avatar
Abydos
Game Master
Game Master
 
Posts: 6839
Joined: Jan 22, 2011 21:14

Postby Abydos » May 29, 2013 10:24

Image

User avatar
_Oglop_
Phoenix Knight
 
Posts: 1414
Joined: Dec 10, 2010 05:24

Postby _Oglop_ » May 29, 2013 10:44

Learn to counter these players.

Stop being 100% reliant on anytime styles and reactionaries! Not everyone wants to watch their character let RNG get the best of them.
Image
"It's not fair unless I'm winning!"

User avatar
HulkGris
Phoenix Knight
 
Posts: 1256
Joined: Jan 23, 2012 19:48

Postby HulkGris » May 29, 2013 11:45

Jezzmin wrote:
mdocod wrote:1. Live may have forwarded which characters were /facing who to clients. This would mean that the only time that /face could be circumvented would be in the first round of latency from when /face is chosen to when the clients of opponents are made aware of this.

wow, this seems to be a VERY good way of fixing this...
(...)
other idea: the server needs to flag a player's /face-target...and if some1 lands a side/back style on a target then the server should check for the targets face-target first...if side-styler and victims face-target are the same -> fail on sidestyle...

I described exactly this "other idea" last month in this thread : viewtopic.php?f=32&t=30367&p=292514&hilit=face%20server#p292514

But i'm almost sure that "face" command is not even send to the server. Need to test this during next LD. When you have red square, if you can /face, I think that it means that it's not sent to server :|
RIP : Ectoplasme
My own version of Uthgard Character Builder

User avatar
Jezzmin
Phoenix Knight
 
Posts: 1602
Joined: Mar 11, 2010 01:00

Postby Jezzmin » May 29, 2013 12:43

HulkGris wrote:But i'm almost sure that "face" command is not even send to the server. Need to test this during next LD. When you have red square, if you can /face, I think that it means that it's not sent to server :|


wrong imho...i'm sure there's some things that are sent to the server AND done locally...so if you can face while LDing, that only shows, that /face is evaluated on your client...it might still be sent to the server...

a comment from the staff on this would be nice...it wouldn't be perfectly livelike, but it would fix a "bug" that mythic has never been able to fix...
Genuine Spirit Cabalist since 2002

Magicco wrote:i would give my live acc data only to trustworthy ppl like jezzmin

User avatar
Methusalem
Phoenix Knight
 
Posts: 1240
Joined: Mar 28, 2008 01:00
Location: Good Old Germany

Postby Methusalem » May 29, 2013 12:47

there is just a single question :

does gm`s wanna punish that exploidabuse or not ?

if they want, they find a way........
Image

Healowner wrote:Ranger: QQ
Rest of server: ROFL
bodoterror6 wrote:QQ MORE PLEASE PLEASEEEEEEEEE PLEASEEEEEEEEE, we owned you -> fact. now stfu, press tab and keep playing your miserable no skill characters ^^ bb

User avatar
Sinoda
Myrmidon
 
Posts: 123
Joined: May 20, 2010 00:00

Postby Sinoda » May 29, 2013 13:03

Make it as everyone else here, abuse the gamemechanics whenever you can and use every exploit you find. :rolleyes:
Sensless to cry about Side- or Backstyles form the front. Strafing and lagruns are the way to go. Sad but true.

Simplest way to fix it: Do not play solo!


Return to Support

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests

Tuesday, 06. May 2025

Artwork and screen shots Copyright © 2001-2004 Mythic Entertainment, Inc. All rights reserved. Used with permission of Mythic Entertainment. Mythic Entertainment, the Mythic Entertainment logo, "Dark Age of Camelot," "Shrouded Isles," "Foundations," "New Frontiers," "Trials of Atlantis," "Catacombs," "Darkness Rising," the Dark Age of Camelot and subsequent logos, and the stylized Celtic knot are trademarks of Mythic Entertainment, Inc.

Valid XHTML & CSS | Original Design by: LernVid.com | Modified by Uthgard Staff