question about sb specing and def penetration

Public communication platform for all Midgard players.
krisdtn
Myrmidon
 
Posts: 78
Joined: May 17, 2012 23:05

Postby krisdtn » Jan 08, 2013 18:40

From what i am reading the def penetration is still broke. So my question is at end gaming leaving mh weap spec under 30 to bring cs and la to 39 and stealth/env to 36 currently viable? Discuss

User avatar
Orihiime
Phoenix Knight
 
Posts: 1740
Joined: Dec 15, 2010 11:40

Postby Orihiime » Jan 08, 2013 19:32

krisdtn wrote:From what i am reading the def penetration is still broke. So my question is at end gaming leaving mh weap spec under 30 to bring cs and la to 39 and stealth/env to 36 currently viable? Discuss

Will be a total fail. Go full LA until rr7.
rr4 spec : 50LA, 36 stealth, 36 sword or axe, 36 envenom, 10 cs.
until rr7, down the stealth and envenom every rr passed ( 5 and 6) and raise cs.
at rr7 go for 44 LA, 34 cs, 33 stealth and envenom, 34 sword or axe.
2012:<@[Uth]Abydos> If we don't have SI by the end of the year, Im fairly certain I wont be a GM anymore :-p

User avatar
Siberia
Guardian
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Jun 05, 2007 00:00

Postby Siberia » Feb 07, 2013 12:55

Orihiime wrote:
krisdtn wrote:From what i am reading the def penetration is still broke. So my question is at end gaming leaving mh weap spec under 30 to bring cs and la to 39 and stealth/env to 36 currently viable? Discuss

Will be a total fail. Go full LA until rr7.
rr4 spec : 50LA, 36 stealth, 36 sword or axe, 36 envenom, 10 cs.
until rr7, down the stealth and envenom every rr passed ( 5 and 6) and raise cs.
at rr7 go for 44 LA, 34 cs, 33 stealth and envenom, 34 sword or axe.



Orihiime can motivate better why the 50 LA spec should be chosen to 4LX?

thanks

User avatar
Orihiime
Phoenix Knight
 
Posts: 1740
Joined: Dec 15, 2010 11:40

Postby Orihiime » Feb 07, 2013 22:44

Siberia wrote:
Orihiime wrote:
krisdtn wrote:From what i am reading the def penetration is still broke. So my question is at end gaming leaving mh weap spec under 30 to bring cs and la to 39 and stealth/env to 36 currently viable? Discuss

Will be a total fail. Go full LA until rr7.
rr4 spec : 50LA, 36 stealth, 36 sword or axe, 36 envenom, 10 cs.
until rr7, down the stealth and envenom every rr passed ( 5 and 6) and raise cs.
at rr7 go for 44 LA, 34 cs, 33 stealth and envenom, 34 sword or axe.



Orihiime can motivate better why the 50 LA spec should be chosen to 4LX?

thanks

Better dmg, full back chain. Engage with backstab and do the backchain from la do way more dmg than perf, especially with the perf fix if u go only 34 cs. This spec worked awesome for me until rr7. and at very high rr u can spec for full cs ( i specced full cs after rr10 )
2012:<@[Uth]Abydos> If we don't have SI by the end of the year, Im fairly certain I wont be a GM anymore :-p

User avatar
pweet
Lion Knight
 
Posts: 4243
Joined: Dec 22, 2010 14:07

Postby pweet » Feb 07, 2013 23:03

LA styles are not fixed for SBs, thats why you better go LA as a SB =)

User avatar
vangonaj
Alerion Knight
 
Posts: 2497
Joined: Sep 14, 2007 00:00
Location: Galpen

Postby vangonaj » Feb 07, 2013 23:05

In my opinion go ever 50 LA.
Image


Return to Midgard

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 49 guests

Sunday, 22. June 2025

Artwork and screen shots Copyright © 2001-2004 Mythic Entertainment, Inc. All rights reserved. Used with permission of Mythic Entertainment. Mythic Entertainment, the Mythic Entertainment logo, "Dark Age of Camelot," "Shrouded Isles," "Foundations," "New Frontiers," "Trials of Atlantis," "Catacombs," "Darkness Rising," the Dark Age of Camelot and subsequent logos, and the stylized Celtic knot are trademarks of Mythic Entertainment, Inc.

Valid XHTML & CSS | Original Design by: LernVid.com | Modified by Uthgard Staff