Uthgard • View topic

RvR is dead

34 posts • Page 2 of 3 • 1, 2, 3

Skarz Gryphon Knight Posts: 417 Joined: Apr 11, 2007 00:00	by Skarz » Apr 21, 2012 00:41 haha at blue's sig

Siminor Myrmidon Posts: 146 Joined: Jan 05, 2012 11:53	by Siminor » Apr 21, 2012 06:22 Woohoo I agree with Blue also! Most people on Uthagrd play all realms so not like theres any real realm pride just a switch when relics are taken:) ADD, don't add, play how you want to. Just my experience is that always adding kills action and Uthgard has had a decent population lately, but can't really afford to have a group or 2 rage log then there is no one to fight usually.

natchou Warder Posts: 25 Joined: Feb 18, 2011 21:19	by natchou » Apr 22, 2012 11:36 i agree, rvr is dead, there r nothing, and when u find one, his friend alb or mid or hib is here, ally must be forbidden !

Lifioch Myrmidon Posts: 205 Joined: Jun 27, 2010 00:00	by Lifioch » Apr 22, 2012 13:59 natchou wrote:i agree, rvr is dead, there r nothing, and when u find one, his friend alb or mid or hib is here, ally must be forbidden ! it's rvr not pvp

Orihiime Phoenix Knight Posts: 1740 Joined: Dec 15, 2010 11:40	by Orihiime » Apr 22, 2012 14:03 natchou wrote:i agree, rvr is dead, there r nothing, and when u find one, his friend alb or mid or hib is here, ally must be forbidden ! Ally exist in every war, so deal with it, you zerg, dont wonder why the 2 others realms ally against you ^^ 2012:<@[Uth]Abydos> If we don't have SI by the end of the year, Im fairly certain I wont be a GM anymore :-p

Akip Alerion Knight Posts: 2123 Joined: May 04, 2006 00:00	by Akip » Apr 22, 2012 15:08 but there are stories that even in WW2 germans and french celebrated x-mas together :X the day after they continued shooting each other

Daedron Myrmidon Posts: 118 Joined: Feb 02, 2007 01:00	by Daedron » Apr 22, 2012 17:15 I don't see a problem with Trishin's statement there! In fact I think it's good that the staff finally clarified how their position is towards 1v1 situations like that. And RVR has been called dead for ages on this server and - even though I don't know about the situation at the moment - I am pretty sure it really is! Daedr Hi!

Hendak Warder Posts: 57 Joined: Apr 22, 2010 00:00 Location: Great White North	by Hendak » Apr 22, 2012 20:39 c. Arranged fights are not allowed, especially not in low activity areas This is very bad wording. Saying something is NOT allowed then adding ESPECIALLY NOT allowed in the same sentence really doesn't sound very authoritive. What would have been better would have been something along the lines of: c. Arranged fights are prohibited and will result in both a ban and rp rollback. Just saying

Cadam Gryphon Knight Posts: 282 Joined: Nov 19, 2009 01:00 Location: Paraguay ICQ	by Cadam » Apr 22, 2012 22:04 Akip wrote:but there are stories that even in WW2 germans and french celebrated x-mas together :X the day after they continued shooting each other that was WW1

ZaiQQ Eagle Knight Posts: 900 Joined: Jan 09, 2011 07:24	by ZaiQQ » Apr 23, 2012 09:20 Akip wrote:but there are stories that even in WW2 germans and french celebrated x-mas together :X the day after they continued shooting each other Did the french ever fight? thought they were just running away.

HulkGris Phoenix Knight Posts: 1256 Joined: Jan 23, 2012 19:48	by HulkGris » Apr 23, 2012 10:36 ZaiQQ wrote:Did the french ever fight? thought they were just running away. RIP : Ectoplasme My own version of Uthgard Character Builder

Skarz Gryphon Knight Posts: 417 Joined: Apr 11, 2007 00:00	by Skarz » Apr 23, 2012 10:50 think you'll find the rules in place to prevent abuser's, remember it only takes 1 idiot for a new rule to get implemented, this aint ww1 or ww2 or not even close. i dnt see the comparison. i wanna double check with rule C. for example im fighting lets say a ranger and a trio hibs stop to watch / wait. i kill the ranger then the melee out of the trio starts to attack me, thats a que right ? i just want to make sure that the bannable party is they guy que'ing and not the victim whos simply fighting to stay alive. i find myself in this situation all the time.

Higadi Warder Posts: 23 Joined: Apr 14, 2011 16:07 Website	by Higadi » Apr 23, 2012 11:24 The fact is RvR is ruined by Mid zergers and if you are not enjoying that, you can reroll on another realm and build team, or zerg to kill them. We've seen when they camp amg with 3/6fgs they enjoy to kill teams or pickup groups, but when they move on a keep and try real RvR action, they are rapped by hibs groups. We moved on Hib because we are not really interested by alb (stupid democraty !), and i hope, decent mid teams will move on alb/hib to destroy that zerg buss. They are all useless players who are not able to perform on anything, just killing groups with 5 or 6 time more players. At the end, we will take back a balanced RvR, when players will really have the choice about to do what they want to do. Of course, arranged fights, pl rp or this kind of craps are not desirable. But having the choice to engage or not, to add or not is a guild or a team policy problem. The problem today on Uth is that everyone lost the choice to play as they want in RvR, and zergers killed the server fun in PvP.

holsten-knight Lion Knight Posts: 4449 Joined: Jul 15, 2009 00:00 Location: Hamburg Website	by holsten-knight » Apr 23, 2012 12:13 says the team playing here for how long? Blue Sunday I-VII \| UFC 2vs2 Event

Skarz Gryphon Knight Posts: 417 Joined: Apr 11, 2007 00:00	by Skarz » Apr 23, 2012 12:16 AMG info mids = zergers hibs = adders albs = duelers 4 sb's attack 1 inf, 10 rangers/ 2 ns gank the 4 sb's... sb's grp up with others to take on the hibs... albs log. mids win. hibs log, hibs / albs log onto uthgard forums and QQ oh and btw ive never seen mids actualy camp amg with a zerg.