-

Satz
- Alerion Knight
-
- Posts: 1860
- Joined: Jun 21, 2005 00:00
- Location: Albion
|
by Satz » Nov 23, 2011 00:32
To dump that clipping sight stealth detection at amg in emain, and get a pc-freeze due to the sheer amount of suddenly apearing names?
|
|
-

Orihiime
- Phoenix Knight
-
- Posts: 1740
- Joined: Dec 15, 2010 11:40
|
by Orihiime » Nov 23, 2011 00:32
Sumosan wrote:i just wanted to be rr6+ when old ras inc... /yawn
regards kraehe
huahuahua
2012:<@[Uth]Abydos> If we don't have SI by the end of the year, Im fairly certain I wont be a GM anymore :-p
|
|
-

Garad
- Gryphon Knight
-
- Posts: 267
- Joined: Mar 01, 2010 01:00
|
by Garad » Nov 23, 2011 07:44
Orihiime wrote:Kryss wrote:Actually, I'd like to know if the 2buffs proposal is still in the dev's agenda.. any word on that? It really shouldn't take a lot of work.
U want that for be more op as ranger ? u not enough strong as melee ranger u want that other class cant use buff ? sound stupid
Acutually, playing a low RR inf and a low RR ranger (specced already for pure melee, now hybrid, next bow), I would like to say, that playing my Inf in 1on1 feels like going with a hot knife trough butter while playing my ranger feels like wasting timed RAs like hell just to win 1on1 against a equal opponent. In my opionion, asssassins using charges and pots are going to beat melee ranger at the low to medium RR (At high RR, the combination of IP, PD and Purge might be stronger than Viper + Purge + MoCrit) The only thing were melee rangers are shining is to bash 3-5 unbuffed newb stealther at the same time (they can be more durable than assassins). In 1on1 situations, escpecially against non-stealther, assassins have the edge.
 
|
|
-

ZaiQQ
- Eagle Knight
-
- Posts: 900
- Joined: Jan 09, 2011 07:24
|
by ZaiQQ » Nov 23, 2011 12:34
Garad wrote:Orihiime wrote:Kryss wrote:Actually, I'd like to know if the 2buffs proposal is still in the dev's agenda.. any word on that? It really shouldn't take a lot of work.
U want that for be more op as ranger ? u not enough strong as melee ranger u want that other class cant use buff ? sound stupid
Acutually, playing a low RR inf and a low RR ranger (specced already for pure melee, now hybrid, next bow), I would like to say, that playing my Inf in 1on1 feels like going with a hot knife trough butter while playing my ranger feels like wasting timed RAs like hell just to win 1on1 against a equal opponent. In my opionion, asssassins using charges and pots are going to beat melee ranger at the low to medium RR (At high RR, the combination of IP, PD and Purge might be stronger than Viper + Purge + MoCrit) The only thing were melee rangers are shining is to bash 3-5 unbuffed newb stealther at the same time (they can be more durable than assassins). In 1on1 situations, escpecially against non-stealther, assassins have the edge.
Someone who gets it 
|
|
-
Idiap
- Myrmidon
-
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Nov 23, 2010 07:28
|
by Idiap » Nov 23, 2011 19:08
Yeah, I prefer to play my ns instead of my ranger, too much RA dump and then sitting on the sidelines with a ranger, i will be really happy once i get 6l0+ (lol) since i'll have purge3 by then so i dont have to wait long in between fights for purge, which is the only thing slowing me down in emain with my ns.
Huh.
|
|
-

Sumosan
- Gryphon Knight
-
- Posts: 460
- Joined: Jan 07, 2007 01:00
|
by Sumosan » Nov 23, 2011 21:19
Idiap wrote: i get 6l0+ (lol) since i'll have purge3 by then so i dont have to wait long
this ! ...are the toons quit playing after old ras established
|
|
-

Magicco
- Alerion Knight
-
- Posts: 2360
- Joined: Aug 01, 2010 00:00
|
by Magicco » Nov 23, 2011 21:52
Sumosan wrote:Idiap wrote: i get 6l0+ (lol) since i'll have purge3 by then so i dont have to wait long
this ! ...are the toons quit playing after old ras established
do you really think old ra will come? really?
|
|