So let me get this straight.

Talk about your RvR experience here
Braxis
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 834
Joined: Jun 03, 2009 00:00

Postby Braxis » Jul 08, 2011 21:03

RonELuvv wrote:@ Braxis- how exactly do you want me to ask them?

By using /emotes like everyone else does.

BTW: a BIG thanks to the hib trio (you know you are) for not ganking me AND giving me the opportunity to duel your comrade AND not killing me after the act. :D

Wish more ppl were honorable like that.

/salute
nixian wrote:semi classic state --> full classic state = evolving

User avatar
RonELuvv
Alerion Knight
 
Posts: 1995
Joined: Apr 13, 2010 00:00

Postby RonELuvv » Jul 08, 2011 21:09

Aye, "fair" is a very hard thing to determine on this realm, and I couldnt agree more that I dont think what happened should have been a banable offesne either. Like I said, I was just trying to point out that when this stuff happens it can be the best thing to ever happen to frontier RvR or it also has the capabilities of creating some very weird gray areas. I think the staff just needs to be very clear on what is and is not allowed. As somebody else pointed out, what is the difference if i'm on a stealther, stealthed, and enjoying watching a nice duel as opposed to a visi doing the same thing? I dont ever think that should be frowned upon, but it all depends on the situation I guess.

@ Braxis- I'm a ranger w/ camo up and hybrid spec and I was trying to kill a stealthed scout. If I unstealth and emote, or even emote while stealthed and camo'd then I lose a huge advantage (element of surprise and a crit shot) for my class. Its like when I'm dueling hib's in DL and they ask me to not use my bow.... I'm hybrid! No bow for me = death. There have been times when (sorry to use another example Nymeros :D ) 3 albs would show up at AMG and there was no action at all and I would bow to a char and if he bowed back I would fight. That works for me about 50% of the time. Sometimes I have a nice duel, sometimes I end up getting rolled by all 3 as soon as I attack.

Braxis
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 834
Joined: Jun 03, 2009 00:00

Postby Braxis » Jul 09, 2011 01:55

RonELuvv wrote:I'm a ranger w/ camo up and hybrid spec and I was trying to kill a stealthed scout. If I unstealth and emote, or even emote while stealthed and camo'd then I lose a huge advantage (element of surprise and a crit shot) for my class. Its like when I'm dueling hib's in DL and they ask me to not use my bow.... I'm hybrid! No bow for me = death. There have been times when (sorry to use another example Nymeros :D ) 3 albs would show up at AMG and there was no action at all and I would bow to a char and if he bowed back I would fight. That works for me about 50% of the time. Sometimes I have a nice duel, sometimes I end up getting rolled by all 3 as soon as I attack.

You can emote wile stealthed and not really loose anything.
I doubt there is anyone in a fz not expecting to get jumped...
nixian wrote:semi classic state --> full classic state = evolving

User avatar
Entreri
Warder
 
Posts: 25
Joined: Jan 21, 2011 20:00

Postby Entreri » Jul 12, 2011 01:53

Braxis wrote:
Entreri wrote:
Braxis wrote:And whats wrong with trying to kill him, failing, and trying again?
As long as you don't let him kill you its not rp farming.



Well technically, that's rp farming for the winner, but there is nothing wrong in trying and triying again to kill him, it should only be punishable if someone let the other kill him again and again.


So when I wtf pwn someone its rp farming!? :roll:

Better and better... :lol:


you got my message wrong. i didnt say that if you want to kill somebody its wrong(o rvr would not exist), but that is what could be called rp farming (im killing ppl so im farming rps, duh!)
it's let your friend kill you over and over that its wrong.
Image

User avatar
scythe111
Warder
 
Posts: 35
Joined: Jul 29, 2009 00:00

Postby scythe111 » Jul 13, 2011 05:28

Stupid rules like this are why I don't even bother pvp'ing on Uthgard anymore.

Braxis
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 834
Joined: Jun 03, 2009 00:00

Postby Braxis » Jul 13, 2011 10:34

scythe111 wrote:Stupid rules like this are why I don't even bother pvp'ing on Uthgard anymore.

Don't tell me no one from the staff saw this coming... :roll:
nixian wrote:semi classic state --> full classic state = evolving

Zarkor
Unicorn Knight
 
Posts: 3710
Joined: Aug 15, 2006 00:00
Location: Antwerp, Flanders, Belgium

Postby Zarkor » Jul 13, 2011 11:02

scythe111 wrote:Stupid rules like this are why I don't even bother pvp'ing on Uthgard anymore.

So then, you stay because PvE and crafting is so frickin exciting? :lol:
In defense of truth-to-experience.

Plorf
Warder
 
Posts: 46
Joined: Jun 20, 2011 14:48

Postby Plorf » Jul 13, 2011 13:37

Bad news for wtfpwner, good news for normal, low rr/skill players I think.

Previous

Return to Realm versus Realm

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 61 guests

Thursday, 15. May 2025

Artwork and screen shots Copyright © 2001-2004 Mythic Entertainment, Inc. All rights reserved. Used with permission of Mythic Entertainment. Mythic Entertainment, the Mythic Entertainment logo, "Dark Age of Camelot," "Shrouded Isles," "Foundations," "New Frontiers," "Trials of Atlantis," "Catacombs," "Darkness Rising," the Dark Age of Camelot and subsequent logos, and the stylized Celtic knot are trademarks of Mythic Entertainment, Inc.

Valid XHTML & CSS | Original Design by: LernVid.com | Modified by Uthgard Staff