Ideas to improve the current RvR situation No. X

Talk about your RvR experience here
User avatar
anomius
Guardian
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Sep 23, 2008 00:00

Postby anomius » Jul 31, 2010 19:53

good ideas...i'm agree with both point!

User avatar
Krinton3
Myrmidon
 
Posts: 196
Joined: Nov 13, 2007 01:00

Postby Krinton3 » Jul 31, 2010 19:53

I used to play on teh freeshard instant50 before,


This is where everyone will stop paying attention to you.

Anyways, what is all this jibber jabber?

Honestly, I don't see why we're discussing this, dropping port times just makes sense. Don't turn it down because you don't think it'll help, if it's not doing any damage, and a lot of people want it, why are you trying to argue anything against it?

Also, OF is the problem. It brought in new members, that's dandy, but RvR sucks way worse than in Agramon.

User avatar
Kiruto
Myrmidon
 
Posts: 125
Joined: Dec 01, 2008 01:00

Postby Kiruto » Jul 31, 2010 20:28

big +1 Krinton.

User avatar
lampardinos
Warder
 
Posts: 27
Joined: Oct 18, 2009 00:00

Postby lampardinos » Jul 31, 2010 21:15

Just do as Bloodwyne said.

User avatar
Blejs
Guardian
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Jul 19, 2010 00:00

Postby Blejs » Jul 31, 2010 21:22

Krinton3 wrote:
I used to play on teh freeshard instant50 before,


This is where everyone will stop paying attention to you.

Anyways, what is all this jibber jabber?

Honestly, I don't see why we're discussing this, dropping port times just makes sense. Don't turn it down because you don't think it'll help, if it's not doing any damage, and a lot of people want it, why are you trying to argue anything against it?

Also, OF is the problem. It brought in new members, that's dandy, but RvR sucks way worse than in Agramon.


Obvious you got no clue what you talking about. First of all why would it matter that i played on instant50 before?

And second, Agramon only works if more groups roaming. Otherwise Agramon is to big rvr zone. I love the design of Agramon, but as i said you need more groups to make it work. Cause its a big big roaming area.
And with the current state uthgarde pvp is, there is no chance it would work.

User avatar
Krinton3
Myrmidon
 
Posts: 196
Joined: Nov 13, 2007 01:00

Postby Krinton3 » Jul 31, 2010 21:48

Agramon is too big but OF is the right size?

You high, boy?

User avatar
Snailcake
Guardian
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Jul 09, 2010 00:00

Postby Snailcake » Jul 31, 2010 22:16

I agree totally ! This would make emain more active and better for all of us !

User avatar
DarkRef
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 412
Joined: Jun 27, 2007 00:00

Postby DarkRef » Jul 31, 2010 22:23

Zarkor wrote:
DarkRef wrote:Why do so many people chose to play in BGs and not Emain?

A couple reasons:

1. Instant port timers means no waiting (waiting is always boring).
2. The layout of the maps means theres more chance for other types of RvR, such as 1v1, 2v1, 4v4, 14v23

(and the myth told by many forum posters that us super hardcore players that pee in bottles on our desk drive those casuals away)


Refref you can't be serious.


Then why didnt we have this problem back in the old (new) emain with the tele-keeps (with crau and crim as the main keeps)?

User avatar
bodoterror
Warder
 
Posts: 8
Joined: Apr 15, 2009 00:00

Postby bodoterror » Jul 31, 2010 22:24

now those are some great ideas griselda said :) i'm ok with them

User avatar
Hopper1984
Myrmidon
 
Posts: 126
Joined: Apr 09, 2010 00:00

Postby Hopper1984 » Jul 31, 2010 22:48

i also think that both suggestions would be nice for uthgard and makes rvr in other zones more possible than now.

i think its an good idea.

mfg lupo :D

User avatar
Feelit
Myrmidon
 
Posts: 123
Joined: Mar 13, 2010 01:00

Postby Feelit » Jul 31, 2010 22:50

DarkRef wrote:
Zarkor wrote:
DarkRef wrote:Why do so many people chose to play in BGs and not Emain?

A couple reasons:

1. Instant port timers means no waiting (waiting is always boring).
2. The layout of the maps means theres more chance for other types of RvR, such as 1v1, 2v1, 4v4, 14v23

(and the myth told by many forum posters that us super hardcore players that pee in bottles on our desk drive those casuals away)


Refref you can't be serious.


Then why didnt we have this problem back in the old (new) emain with the tele-keeps (with crau and crim as the main keeps)?


here ref ,.. have fun reading
http://uthgard-server.net/modules.php?n ... ght=zarkor

as you can see he really thought about the problemS ,.. AND wrote it with the solutions down ,..+ discussed it with others...
this caused the RvR revamp the Gms are currently working on ,.

and now you come with ,.. 2-3 sentences and say : X is the reason and Y will solve it ,..
sry but it looks a bit nasty

User avatar
Runental
Phoenix Knight
 
Posts: 1163
Joined: Aug 21, 2009 00:00
Location: Funkytown

Postby Runental » Jul 31, 2010 23:05

Hopper1984 wrote:and makes rvr in other zones more possible


and thats the Point..

not emain.
Image
ONE a Shaman solo Video
TWO a Shaman solo Video

User avatar
Emeryc
Myrmidon
 
Posts: 143
Joined: Dec 05, 2009 01:00

Postby Emeryc » Jul 31, 2010 23:23

Snailcake wrote:I agree totally ! This would make emain more active and better for all of us !

This is the problem with RvR: RvR =/= Emain

User avatar
JayStyle
Warder
 
Posts: 9
Joined: Apr 03, 2010 00:00

Postby JayStyle » Aug 01, 2010 03:40

Emeryc wrote:
Snailcake wrote:I agree totally ! This would make emain more active and better for all of us !

This is the problem with RvR: RvR =/= Emain


As long as even Emain is dead sometimes during Primetime your point is moot....

User avatar
Llithium
Myrmidon
 
Posts: 103
Joined: Jun 15, 2010 00:00

Postby Llithium » Aug 01, 2010 07:31

In any case I like the idea of keeping the server classic, but did it come to anyones mind yet, that Mythic was not perfect?

My point of view is, that classic was the best sequence of DAoC. I dislike anything that came after classic, even the SI classes are not balanced with the classic ones.
But anyway, I don't think it is too custom trying to get balance and improvement for the Uthgard shard.
We have different circumstances here, different activity, different focuses especially in case of leveling twinks and fighting in BGs.
If there are problems I'd like the mentality to solve them, improve the situation and not do the same mistakes that Mythic did on live.
As the main issue is the fun here, it shall be everyones aim to support this idea.

P.s.: Nevermind if it is a player problem, you can't change all player minds or create a rule system that forces everyone to integrate new players or less skilled players etc.. But we can try to improve the settings, so don't discuss the impossible things and keep focus on possible ones.

(Anyways I don't like how the RvR mentality grew up and made the people form SGs and high RR groups as an irrevocable base for doing RvR. But even faster RvR can improve the situation by the motivation of a retry in Emain without waiting 5-15 minutes each wipe.)
Image

PreviousNext

Return to Realm versus Realm

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 39 guests

Thursday, 15. May 2025

Artwork and screen shots Copyright © 2001-2004 Mythic Entertainment, Inc. All rights reserved. Used with permission of Mythic Entertainment. Mythic Entertainment, the Mythic Entertainment logo, "Dark Age of Camelot," "Shrouded Isles," "Foundations," "New Frontiers," "Trials of Atlantis," "Catacombs," "Darkness Rising," the Dark Age of Camelot and subsequent logos, and the stylized Celtic knot are trademarks of Mythic Entertainment, Inc.

Valid XHTML & CSS | Original Design by: LernVid.com | Modified by Uthgard Staff