Why do you think the Ranger is OP ?
|
I feel like I'm wasting my time at this point since this is such an awful thread, but this is the one good point made so far. I think a lot of people that are railing against PD don't understand the real problem with this class. What makes the Ranger OP is a combination of different factors. PD is only one part of it. PD does allow Rangers to be exceptionally lazy in their play-style (as with your typical Celt/Shar melee build) and still win most fights. A well played hybrid build, however, is far more powerful. Also, I'd like to give a shout out to massivmamper for his compelling and oh so useful "Ranger vs. Warden" balance comparison. I had no idea a fully self-buffed hybrid with pulsing PBT and a 10-second stun off of parry could be effective in 1v1 combat. This is real game-changing information and I look forward to leveling my Ranger-killing Midgard Warden. Thank you so much. Last edited by Seyha on May 18, 2010 18:22, edited 3 times in total.
|
|
You are really stupid man. I ALWAYS go with AF buff on, do you know? i'm an hunter and i have self AF buff. And all the SB i know always roam with charges of AF on. I was just kidding you. EDIT: oh... and another thing: how can i play my class to it's full potential if my class is incomplete? We're not all rangers mate. ![]() |
|
yeah i agree, we all need to learn how play our classes, u don t need ![]() this server make all for your class, so just spam anytimer covered with side stun and u are ok, no need other, and teach us how we can kill u (af buffs, viper 3, etc etc) rofl, rangers are working like live ... i am sure u haven't never played a ranger on live, don't forget, some one, can have more experience than u of live ... even if here is 4l2 ... |
|
I havent played Ranger on Live but NS in classic days and even rr8 scouts couldnt stand a chance vs my mighty rr4 ns. Only lost to rr7+ assassins.
There is one guy that has played ranger on live. He made ranger here and went on to NS and we are the opinion that ns is better. |
|
Ok, if i laugh then i'm a child... can i cry? ![]() |
|
what mean classics times? 1.60+? or the times mytich done classics servers? (with vampir lol) because if u talking about 1.60+ we haven't played the same game ... ns always be the gimpies assassins even if with pd (active ra) started to be decent a little before toa when they got remedy as ra (not rr5, was not implemented, the first assassins get it was ns because was totally underperforming against infs/sbs) before 1.60 best assassin was SB but only for the laxe bugged after 1.60 till today best assassin (stealther on general) infiltrator but, on my opinion, inf always be the best, on classic times with dragon fang 9secs stun was very very deadly (why here no df 9 secs stun?) rangers always be best archer (maybe till the last fix to hunters, with uber pet) scout always be the gimpiest on melee, but damn deadly with bow on small hidden grp's but, in any time of daoc, rangers always had to escape to pure stealthers (infs/sb) because always had no chance, repeat, even if with ip up. basically, stealthers evade all, like should be (with evade 7) and with high grow rate of critical line on evade chain totally destroy archers. this always be daoc but, repeat, the problem of purga are not rangers, the problem is the combat system. |
|
why do you always see the same 5-10 ppl cry about rangers?
maybe just those 5 ppl got a prob with em? same storry every time. and all of those whiners did never play a ranger on live. you know ranger on live was way harder? yes, i talk about classic live. ![]() |
|
Classic means SI times until a short period after NF.
|
|
realac, sono d'accordo con tutto quello che hai scritto, ma se continui a chiamare questo server Purga nessuno ci capisce niente ![]() ---------------------------------- Uh and about Ronia's last post: my mom told me that she think Scout is better than ranger, this is a proof too that rangers are not OP so please stop this discussion. ---------------------------------
'cause all the other stealthers directly roll a ranger. ![]() |
|
Do me a favour and post your last salis rvr ranger vid^^ |
|
eheh yeah sorry
![]() uthgard ![]() |
|
I didn't realize you play a hunter, in which case I agree with you, hunters need to be fixed.. ![]() |
|
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=LT1I1B28 422mb video of a ranger which you all think is op'ed on uthgard. this vid is from the german live classic server salisbury and was made in 2006. If anyone knows what was changed with ranger till the patch we are running on uth, please let me know. (i know you got +overcap there, but my enemys got to.) greetz. |
|
There´s five pages of crap here and not even one SS to have some serious discussion about the OPed rangers. Eclipse really tried to end up that exhausting whinefest within bringing some decent evidence. I was thinking about doing some fight history and post SS here when this thread started but it´s not worth even hitting the SS button in game since:
It´s simply not possible to discuss something with frustrated players getting bashed at AMG by ****** of rangers ... vote for delete every single upcoming ranger QQ since it will be pointless ![]() Satas Hakx - various artists
|
|
it's fun wait kryptonite said : people complain agains't rangers are always the same : yes , all class complain about ranger : who defend ranger ? only rangers ... coincidence ?
![]() a thing really ****** me off , you aren't strong because of your skill but only because of your class , when i see most of ranger play i really want to stop playing my sb , spamming taunt style with the mouse ready to purge & ip that's pathetic... + they want to learn other players how to play their class.. just reroll and duel a ranger before speaking like if you are godlike of uthgard |
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests