ForumSM question
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|
is the 50% SM pet intercept rate ," working as intended" or is this a bug?
|
|
Intended for the highest pet. Lower pets -> lower intercept.
Greetz Nes Inactive
|
|
50% is correct.
It's done when it's done. Thanks for your patience.
Every bug gets fixed. Sooner or later. "It is an inescapable law of nature that the amount of satisfaction one gains from achieving something is related to how hard it is and easy things can only elicit a fleeting superficial sort of pleasure." Blue says, "you used macro tools or macro keyboard" Pala says, "i am disabled. and i have a mechanic left hand that can be programed. its hard to play woith one hand" [Appeal] Bxxxxxxxx: "why is RA first aid cann man i stealth use and not unstealth cann man ra if man use unstealth ?????????" BannedUser: "i was not using automate game action my hand was fall on keyboard during i was sleep .... i was completly fall on keyboard ..." |
|
Yesterday i was hitting an SM for 150(-10)ish damage with styles and the intercepting damage on the pet was like 30(+5).
Are the pets supposed to have this kind of uber melee absorbtion? I played SM alot on live and from what i remember, no. |
|
i never played one, but i remember people complaining that if they get PA'ed the pat would die.
kinda silly thing to complain about. after all. you could of been PA'ed and not the pet |
|
Wonder how much damage you would do if u would have directly PAed the pet. The intercepted damage should be atleast equal - if daoc would be consistent and logic. Maybe you should google it. Greetz Nes Inactive
|
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests