Valewalker Dmg

Public communication platform for all Hibernia players.
User avatar
Satz
Alerion Knight
 
Posts: 1860
Joined: Jun 21, 2005 00:00
Location: Albion

Postby Satz » Aug 05, 2009 22:48

duo bard+x, with x beeing vw or champ, youll own hard....

User avatar
Jarysa
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 664
Joined: May 05, 2009 00:00

Postby Jarysa » Aug 06, 2009 02:36

Funkling wrote:Because they have the best style ingame on top of good debuffs. Oh wait, none of that matters because vws can nuke.


Heros and BMs can slam, too.

Champ debuffs, rr5 and ST actually make them good grp chars.
VWs are nice for grps because of Baod, Ichor and disease proc.
Just like champs they will be dead for grp rvr when OF RAs hit the field.


If you think that Annihilation is a good Style...

"Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity."

Zarkor
Unicorn Knight
 
Posts: 3710
Joined: Aug 15, 2006 00:00
Location: Antwerp, Flanders, Belgium

Postby Zarkor » Aug 06, 2009 03:59

Jarysa wrote:
Funkling wrote:Because they have the best style ingame on top of good debuffs. Oh wait, none of that matters because vws can nuke.


Heros and BMs can slam, too.

Champ debuffs, rr5 and ST actually make them good grp chars.
VWs are nice for grps because of Baod, Ichor and disease proc.
Just like champs they will be dead for grp rvr when OF RAs hit the field.


If you think that Annihilation is a good Style...

"Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity."


Annihilation IS a good style, in Classic DAoC. Compared to SI styles, it's not really what you'd be picking from the list, indeed.

User avatar
Jarysa
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 664
Joined: May 05, 2009 00:00

Postby Jarysa » Aug 06, 2009 04:40

Zarkor wrote:Annihilation IS a good style, in Classic DAoC. Compared to SI styles, it's not really what you'd be picking from the list, indeed.


No, it isnt.

It´s good but not great damage with a worthless effect as both classes that could get it should have slam, and heros have a better backstyle in CS.

Hammer backstyle would be an example of a good style.
Slam is by far the best style in the game.


Only advantage annihilation has is that you get to spec 50 instead of 40 valour and 50 instead of 49 LW as a champ if you can runthrough annihilate well.

Zarkor
Unicorn Knight
 
Posts: 3710
Joined: Aug 15, 2006 00:00
Location: Antwerp, Flanders, Belgium

Postby Zarkor » Aug 06, 2009 10:18

Jarysa wrote:
Zarkor wrote:Annihilation IS a good style, in Classic DAoC. Compared to SI styles, it's not really what you'd be picking from the list, indeed.


No, it isnt.

It´s good but not great damage with a worthless effect as both classes that could get it should have slam, and heros have a better backstyle in CS.

Hammer backstyle would be an example of a good style.
Slam is by far the best style in the game.


Only advantage annihilation has is that you get to spec 50 instead of 40 valour and 50 instead of 49 LW as a champ if you can runthrough annihilate well.



If you're looking to do damage (yes, that's possible with a hero), Annihilation is way better than the CS backstyle.

User avatar
Cespx
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 466
Joined: Jun 28, 2007 00:00

Postby Cespx » Aug 06, 2009 12:00

Shamrock wrote:Cespx... why do you say champs aren't any good in RvR?



Simple. Because Champ is a PvP class.
Champ strenght is created by self Str/Con- you lose this bonus in grp, Debuffs that highly increase they offensive and defensive power in PvP plus shield&st that also make your def better.

If you want to play RvR you can either spec high LW or Valor, no chance for both. This means dmg lose. Since most of grps run with BMs,Heros Champs defensive skills are not that important anymore. Champ is also a class without stoi so it's much easier to be stopped. Plus (if you want to compare champ with VW) VW can still rupt supporters if rooted,snared. Champ can just wait till those effect fade.

To conclude, in RvR champ can play everything and nothing at the same time because he can be easly replaced with any better dmg dealing class or any defensive tank.

User avatar
Jarysa
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 664
Joined: May 05, 2009 00:00

Postby Jarysa » Aug 06, 2009 13:02

Zarkor wrote:If you're looking to do damage (yes, that's possible with a hero), Annihilation is way better than the CS backstyle.


If the target is stunned CS side chain has the same GR.
If its not stunned its better to snare it then to do like what 20? damage more.

CS has the damage advantage on pretty much all non casters that get grouped ever by armor resist tables.

LW will do more damage on palas, armsmen (worst targets ever), friars (ok they dont get groups), zerkers and savages (somewhat usefull).

User avatar
Funkling
Banned
 
Posts: 493
Joined: May 31, 2009 00:00

Postby Funkling » Aug 06, 2009 14:01

Jarysa wrote:If you think that Annihilation is a good Style...


I don't think it is, I know it is.
Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity.

Previous

Return to Hibernia

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests

Saturday, 03. May 2025

Artwork and screen shots Copyright © 2001-2004 Mythic Entertainment, Inc. All rights reserved. Used with permission of Mythic Entertainment. Mythic Entertainment, the Mythic Entertainment logo, "Dark Age of Camelot," "Shrouded Isles," "Foundations," "New Frontiers," "Trials of Atlantis," "Catacombs," "Darkness Rising," the Dark Age of Camelot and subsequent logos, and the stylized Celtic knot are trademarks of Mythic Entertainment, Inc.

Valid XHTML & CSS | Original Design by: LernVid.com | Modified by Uthgard Staff