Since the rr10 are waiting the low rr players in agramon , would be cool if there will be added another BG after Thidranki where 50 level players between 4L2 -6L2 to go and any other level wich got rp cap in Thidranki .
A map like Molvik wich is very good because no water / no bridges and small enough to meet fast each other . That battleground is required because the difference from the rr11 campers and the new players coming in agramon is to huge , the new chars need even the free rr5 or even enough rp to take the ra 's wich can balance the fights in agramon . Other thing , any of the 4L2 -6L2 can go anytime in Frontiers to defend keeps /towers , it not affect the realm defence , just the players over 6L2 could not enter anymore in that BG for 4l2-6l2 .
There are many 50-ers wich dont come anymore in Agramon after they got wiped 20-30 times in row by the rr11 fg roaming 24/7 , part of them already quited the server , others start reroll new char and that just increase the PvE and not RvR . Is just simple , the jump from Thidranki to Agramon is to big , it should not be like this if there wouldn't be the "superbrilliants rr11" waiting with high ranks to show their skill in killing rr4 . Any reply against this topic it will come only from the rr10-rr11 wich dont agree with that ofc , it may kill their fun and they already insulted me on my other topic . Just make a poll for that battleground on the Polls forum .

I like this idea. But I'd rather see Cathal Valley than Molvik.

I would also like a 20-27 bg. But it's very optimistic thinking. GMs will never implement more BGs.

Pafpafinc wrote:Since the rr10 are waiting the low rr players in agramon , would be cool if there will be added another BG after Thidranki where 50 level players between 4L2 -6L2 to go and any other level wich got rp cap in Thidranki .
A map like Molvik wich is very good because no water / no bridges and small enough to meet fast each other . That battleground is required because the difference from the rr11 campers and the new players coming in agramon is to huge , the new chars need even the free rr5 or even enough rp to take the ra 's wich can balance the fights in agramon . Other thing , any of the 4L2 -6L2 can go anytime in Frontiers to defend keeps /towers , it not affect the realm defence , just the players over 6L2 could not enter anymore in that BG for 4l2-6l2 .
There are many 50-ers wich dont come anymore in Agramon after they got wiped 20-30 times in row by the rr11 fg roaming 24/7 , part of them already quited the server , others start reroll new char and that just increase the PvE and not RvR . Is just simple , the jump from Thidranki to Agramon is to big , it should not be like this if there wouldn't be the "superbrilliants rr11" waiting with high ranks to show their skill in killing rr4 . Any reply against this topic it will come only from the rr10-rr11 wich dont agree with that ofc , it may kill their fun and they already insulted me on my other topic . Just make a poll for that battleground on the Polls forum .

I know what will happen:

Maybe some of the 24/7 come here and say: delete the pve too and force everybody to Agra to give them more meat! And say: Nooo already too low the new lvl 50 freerp population in Agra! :p

Seriously: There is another possibility to kill that team: merge some grp to roll together.. But yeah, most of the alb grp are belive the holy 8v8 and don't zerg (2grp=zerg? ) and they rather die 20x and logout then merge 2 grp...

About the inzulted part: I Was there 1 of what you think. That unknown rr10 bd always do that, cause have too much space in his skillbar. Just /ignore them

zerg is, when its not fair anymore. if the rr10 grp can be done by 2 fgs of whatever, its ok. but if its fg against 1, it will be zerg.nevertheless, all is about killing the other realms member. so.. do it however you want

I have got a reply against that topic and I can assure you that I do not have a high realmranking char, not even a RR5 one. A further battleground will not come. One of the main reasons is that another battleground would split up players even more than they already are. Continuous play of one character is going to strenghten that character which is a main component of DAoCs' gameplay meaning that these players deserve the achievement of being stronger than for example a beginner. The introduction of a 4lx - 6lx battleground would thatfor mean an indirect punishment to these players.

So, if you get busted by a highRR group, possible reactions would be:
- if you are solo => get a group.
- if you were in a group => get another group.
- if you were two groups => get another group or simply form a zerg.


As mentioned many times before. DAoC is not a battleground game like WoW or a XvsX area like guildwars. It is a dynamic simulation of a fantasy-medieval battlefield meaning that you as a player have to adapt yourself to the events of the battlefield.


With regards,
Haldan

Haldan wrote:So, if you get busted by a highRR group, possible reactions would be:
- if you are solo => get a group.
- if you were in a group => get another group.
- if you were two groups => get another group or simply form a zerg.

You said good - i agree with it -, unfortunaetly as i said most part of the albs doesn't think like this :<

Usually we wait hours to find people to finish to build a group and there is no rr restriction.

Can you imagine what would happen with this split?

Demiurgo wrote:Usually we wait hours to find people to finish to build a group and there is no rr restriction.

Can you imagine what would happen with this split?

Zub drop under 500k lwrp? (Sorry i couldn't miss this)

Anyway staff already said there won't be any lvl 50 bg, so players have to change their ideas.

No point in this.


We only need a lower level BG, nothing else.

Stop cry and play agramon.

vangonaj wrote:Stop cry and play agramon.

nc... Hm, a mid player?:p

Any mod can close this topic before the flaming start again and again?

I have onr thing to say before it'll be closed.

I agree with Haldan but this play style will never be happen on Uth, because the Community swear on fair 8vs8 dont add/zerg. I would like to see more merging random grps to kick high grps. But its hard enough to find 2 grps running together.

LG Jack

Well if u merge two groups the high group might once go check that if they still stick together and if they do its pretty much sure log out, and hf then

Yep, thats the vicious circle. Maybe this behaviour will change with OF? [I don't really believe it.]

i think OF not, but maybe OF-RAs