Making the case for Cure NS

Talk about your RvR experience here

Would you like a cure NS ability at 40 heal spec on druid/healer/cleric?

yes
56
65%
no
30
35%
 
Total votes : 86

User avatar
Hedra
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 1002
Joined: Mar 14, 2007 01:00

Postby Hedra » Jul 20, 2009 23:51

jrhadden wrote:5 Post = 99% of the server :D

Greetz
Nes

Well I think 99% of the server agrees... The other 1% is the staff ^^


Well my bad if you're against a curable NS, I just forgot that some people like easymode. Cause you play a caster with NS right ? :roll:
I am assuming direct control.

User avatar
Zaraki
Myrmidon
 
Posts: 183
Joined: Jul 13, 2008 00:00
Location: Somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert

Postby Zaraki » Jul 21, 2009 00:11

Haldan wrote:
Facts:

Cure NS was introduced in patch 1.66 as a ML ability. ( = ToA content )
Uthgard is a "classic" server. ( = Classic means no ToA+ features )
Cure NS was added to the healing lines of cleric/healer/druid in patch 1.81 ( = patch-deadline is 1.8 )
Mythic realized... ( Are you Mythic to be able to state what Mythic realized? )
Uthgard GM´s play tanks. ( = not true )


It is not our goal to modify Uthgards game mechanics to your wishes. You all know that we have got strictly set patch standarts and are not going to add single class-features as this would break the "anti customization" door. And please, don't even attempt to begin a discussion like: "But Uthgard is already custom ..." because it is not, though some features are not yet finalized.


Isn't having a 1.80 patch deadline without toa content custom by itself? :roll:
The world will look up and shout "Save us!"...and I'll whisper "NO U."

<img src="http://metty.the-bart.org/other/daoc/sig.php?name=Zaraki&s=4">
<img src="http://metty.the-bart.org/other/daoc/sig.php?name=Chopchop&s=4">

jrhadden
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 938
Joined: Jun 02, 2005 00:00

Postby jrhadden » Jul 21, 2009 00:12

I have 4 caster, and just a single NS ...

So i know both sides of the medal. I just dont like if people claim to speak for the server. Thats all :)

Greetz
Nes
Inactive

User avatar
Funkling
Banned
 
Posts: 493
Joined: May 31, 2009 00:00

Postby Funkling » Jul 21, 2009 00:20

Haldan wrote:It is not our goal to modify Uthgards game mechanics to your wishes. You all know that we have got strictly set patch standarts and are not going to add single class-features as this would break the "anti customization" door. And please, don't even attempt to begin a discussion like: "But Uthgard is already custom ..." because it is not, though some features are not yet finalized.


So OP was right you play tanks. ^^
Last edited by Funkling on Jul 21, 2009 00:22, edited 1 time in total.
Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity.

User avatar
wheelchairbuff
Banned
 
Posts: 215
Joined: Mar 19, 2009 01:00

Postby wheelchairbuff » Jul 21, 2009 00:21

Haldan wrote:
Facts:

Cure NS was introduced in patch 1.66 as a ML ability. ( = ToA content )
Uthgard is a "classic" server. ( = Classic means no ToA+ features )
Cure NS was added to the healing lines of cleric/healer/druid in patch 1.81 ( = patch-deadline is 1.8 )
Mythic realized... ( Are you Mythic to be able to state what Mythic realized? )
Uthgard GM´s play tanks. ( = not true )


It is not our goal to modify Uthgards game mechanics to your wishes. You all know that we have got strictly set patch standarts and are not going to add single class-features as this would break the "anti customization" door. And please, don't even attempt to begin a discussion like: "But Uthgard is already custom ..." because it is not, though some features are not yet finalized.


I think I´ll just take this one by one.

First, thanks for only partially quoting me. It didn´t work to your intention.

Second; Y E S, I can state what Mythic realized simply because the spell WOULD NOT have been added if it wasn´t. Logic 101.

Third, sorry about the GM´s play tanks thingy.

The point here is, only IF you missed it of course, that it is pretty clear that this ability was intended to be available for gameplay balance purposes. Yes, it came with a TOA tag, and when they made their "classic" servers (1,81) they also realized that they could not remove the ability for the same reason as above.

On one hand you don´t want to open up the pandora´s box which is custom changes (which is fully understandable, but let´s face it: that box was opened up a long time ago and this is just denial), and on the other hand you have the opportunity to actually represent the game as it has been meant to be played.

You can easily say "oh, but with our patch limit it´s not included", but that´s not a fair representation of how the game was played at that point in time. I really do hope that your goal is "have a server which represents how the game was played at his point in time" rather than "have a server with a patch note from a time we consider classic".

Sorry for hurting anyones feelings, but this topic has to be brought up and it is very narrowminded just to attempt to shut it out.

OT: How do we see which users have voted what? 4 no´s = curiosity.

hun_cactus
Myrmidon
 
Posts: 171
Joined: Jul 03, 2006 00:00

Postby hun_cactus » Jul 21, 2009 00:30

wheelchairbuff wrote:OT: How do we see which users have voted what? 4 no´s = curiosity.


Pick 4 caster with NS :P
<img src="http://img196.imageshack.us/img196/3213/signzzx.jpg"border="0" />

User avatar
Duke
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 629
Joined: Jan 12, 2006 01:00
Location: MB the Realm 4

Postby Duke » Jul 21, 2009 10:32

NS is one of the things which make an Eldtritch very usefull in Hibernia. Cure NS would kill that.

If you want to implement Cure NS for everyone, why should I not create a poll tomorrow that Hibernia and Albion need Celerity? Or everyone gets anything else.

NS is mighty, but every realm owns it, so there is no cure ns needed.


Duke

nixian
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 5450
Joined: May 19, 2006 00:00

Postby nixian » Jul 21, 2009 10:34

Duke having nor cure nearsight however makes casters less wanted in grps because they are so easyly countered.. 1 nearsighter in a grp could make a whole castergrp worthless in the current setting..


and that means you wont find much else but tank grps on uthgard which is sad for all those who lvl their casters to 50 and never get a chance to rvr in grp

User avatar
DanGer666
Phoenix Knight
 
Posts: 1399
Joined: Feb 03, 2006 01:00

Postby DanGer666 » Jul 21, 2009 10:40

go bomb grp ;)

User avatar
wheelchairbuff
Banned
 
Posts: 215
Joined: Mar 19, 2009 01:00

Postby wheelchairbuff » Jul 21, 2009 10:47

Duke wrote:NS is one of the things which make an Eldtritch very usefull in Hibernia. Cure NS would kill that.

If you want to implement Cure NS for everyone, why should I not create a poll tomorrow that Hibernia and Albion need Celerity? Or everyone gets anything else.

NS is mighty, but every realm owns it, so there is no cure ns needed.


Duke


LOL

"PLZ NO NS CURE MATE I WANT IMBA PLAYER CHAR NOT REALISTIC GAMEPLAY!!!111oneoenoen"

Well I guess more of these posts will be inc :p

User avatar
Isador
Myrmidon
 
Posts: 134
Joined: Oct 16, 2006 00:00

Postby Isador » Jul 21, 2009 10:59

I haven't seen that much "imba nearsighting" yet..

but I also don't think a cure spell would completely kill it.
in a fight, supporters got a whole lot to do.. heal, debuff, cc, surviving, whatever.. in all that chaos a nearsighted group member may have to wait quite some time before he gets the cure.. even longer should the supporter be interrupted, killed or nearsighted himself..

especially with 1.65 I don't see it coming. you have to draw a line..

User avatar
Everwar
Myrmidon
 
Posts: 62
Joined: Mar 09, 2008 01:00

Postby Everwar » Jul 21, 2009 11:37

I voted No cause i want Uthgard full classic.

Ns is an ass pain already with New Ra's, just wait we get Old Ra's and purge each 30 MINUTES :).

And wanna remember Uthgard Staff, that wizzard still needs debuff heat+dd in his Fire spec.

User avatar
Zaraki
Myrmidon
 
Posts: 183
Joined: Jul 13, 2008 00:00
Location: Somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert

Postby Zaraki » Jul 21, 2009 11:50

Everwar wrote:I voted No cause i want Uthgard full classic.

Ns is an ass pain already with New Ra's, just wait we get Old Ra's and purge each 30 MINUTES :).

Yes, AWESOME!!1 casters should end task when they get NS'ed with old RA's! How dare they play a caster when they KNOW this is a tank server!
I don't think I've put in enough exclamation marks in my statement, so heres some more !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

Everwar wrote:And wanna remember Uthgard Staff, that wizzard still needs debuff heat+dd in his Fire spec.


Not really, don't know where you got your information.
The world will look up and shout "Save us!"...and I'll whisper "NO U."

<img src="http://metty.the-bart.org/other/daoc/sig.php?name=Zaraki&s=4">
<img src="http://metty.the-bart.org/other/daoc/sig.php?name=Chopchop&s=4">

User avatar
Funkling
Banned
 
Posts: 493
Joined: May 31, 2009 00:00

Postby Funkling » Jul 21, 2009 12:01

Duke wrote:NS is one of the things which make an Eldtritch very usefull in Hibernia. Cure NS would kill that.


1.) eldritch is the only class with disease in hibernia
2.) cure NS requires a 40 heal spec, which leads to very expensive heals especially with the small powerpools on Uthgard, so yeah there is a drawback to having cure NS

You're talking like NS would become useless and that every healing class could easily access it.

*throws a clue at duke*
Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity.

User avatar
xexijreil
Myrmidon
 
Posts: 149
Joined: Feb 14, 2009 01:00

Postby xexijreil » Jul 21, 2009 12:56

Cure NS is seriously needed in this server, beeing a custom change or not it's not difficult to realize that it would be best u could do for balance between casters/supports and tanks. Problem is that it seems that deoping tanks in Uthgard hurts many people(or some important one at least). It's a pity this poll/thread will be worth nothing...:roll:

PreviousNext

Return to Realm versus Realm

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests

Saturday, 30. August 2025

Artwork and screen shots Copyright © 2001-2004 Mythic Entertainment, Inc. All rights reserved. Used with permission of Mythic Entertainment. Mythic Entertainment, the Mythic Entertainment logo, "Dark Age of Camelot," "Shrouded Isles," "Foundations," "New Frontiers," "Trials of Atlantis," "Catacombs," "Darkness Rising," the Dark Age of Camelot and subsequent logos, and the stylized Celtic knot are trademarks of Mythic Entertainment, Inc.

Valid XHTML & CSS | Original Design by: LernVid.com | Modified by Uthgard Staff