Why do you think the Ranger is OP ?

Talk about your RvR experience here
User avatar
Ronian
Phoenix Knight
 
Posts: 1556
Joined: Jan 12, 2008 01:00

Postby Ronian » May 18, 2010 16:41

vangonaj wrote:
Methusalem wrote:and a point for other hibs :
can u answer me, why ur realmmates search Rangers in broad for tajendi or df-highlordsraids as maintank if ur Ranger isnt a LITTLE oped ?


Is this is true? OMG


Not really. Before block and parryfix Ranger was the best tank with pd5. But the same goes for scout (he is the best ingame because of shieldspec) and maybe hunter.

User avatar
realac0
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 548
Joined: May 18, 2010 00:00

Postby realac0 » May 18, 2010 16:48

Ronian wrote:
vangonaj wrote:
Methusalem wrote:and a point for other hibs :
can u answer me, why ur realmmates search Rangers in broad for tajendi or df-highlordsraids as maintank if ur Ranger isnt a LITTLE oped ?


Is this is true? OMG


Not really. Before block and parryfix Ranger was the best tank with pd5. But the same goes for scout (he is the best ingame because of shieldspec) and maybe hunter.


sorry ronian, but i really have to /laugh after u admited this ;)

p.s.
ask how mutch scouts are grp'ed for tank on hulks (not legionraids or highlors lol) even if pd spec and all with at least 42 shield ^_^


this is really enough for me to understand how a joke are rangers on this server ;)

lol nothing to say more i think ...
after a ranger admited that on hib rangers are more grp friendly than hero/champs for tank (and, for sure, for DEAL DAMAGE, u haven't said this but i am sure about it ^_^)


ah, sry, i edited for this:

-----------------

.... Before block and parryfix Ranger was the BEST TANK with pd5 ......


------------------

this is too mutch funny ;) rangers on Uthgard are tanks (and i agree with u, when i face a ranger here is like face an armsman on 1.60+, for the dps they deal and the defensive pd they have) but, just for let u know it, rangers are not supposed to be tanks ;)

i'am sorry u descovered this .... :(

i'd really like pay again my live account for let u try my luri ranger and let u see, even with all artifacts, new ra's, more hp's, more damage, dot's arrows, leg weapons and malice artifacts etc etc how it perform on rvr.
he perform well, like has to be.
an archer.
that must stay FAR from pure stealthers (infs/sb=BOOM even with IP up), can deal really huge damage with bow (anyway lower than scouts) and can make decent melee damage but that can't face any tank on pure melee.
anyway, a good ranger, can kill all, but need really a lot of lucky and skill on ra's use and found the right moment to inc (need to damage a lot with bow before go melee, kite, hide again, bow again, when target 20% health can go melee ... like ALL ARCHERS).
Last edited by realac0 on May 18, 2010 17:02, edited 4 times in total.

User avatar
Celad
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 685
Joined: Dec 17, 2009 01:00
Location: Italy

Postby Celad » May 18, 2010 16:48

Ronian wrote:
vangonaj wrote:
Methusalem wrote:and a point for other hibs :
can u answer me, why ur realmmates search Rangers in broad for tajendi or df-highlordsraids as maintank if ur Ranger isnt a LITTLE oped ?


Is this is true? OMG


Not really. Before block and parryfix Ranger was the best tank with pd5. But the same goes for scout (he is the best ingame because of shieldspec) and maybe hunter.


BUAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA...


AHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHA...
AHGAAAAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHA...

UHHHHH..... AHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA...

AH! Good one Ronia... really! You are a comedian!

I NEVER see someone spamming in LFG in mid that he need an hunter to tank something... indeed i never see someone spamming in LFG that he need an hunter for pve purpouse...
ImageImage

User avatar
Ronian
Phoenix Knight
 
Posts: 1556
Joined: Jan 12, 2008 01:00

Postby Ronian » May 18, 2010 17:04

There are 2 reasons because it wasnt the same in Midgard or Albion. Midgard has svg which was the overall best tank before block/parry fix because of selfbuffs (melee res) and evade. And Albs still have paladin with plate armor.. I do play Alb too and Paladins get slightly higher damage by the midprince than my ranger with pd5.

User avatar
Celad
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 685
Joined: Dec 17, 2009 01:00
Location: Italy

Postby Celad » May 18, 2010 17:09

Ronian wrote:I do play Alb too and Paladins get slightly higher damage by the midprince than my ranger with pd5.


BUAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAH
AHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAAA...


AHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAA...
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA...

Oh, please Ronia, go on... this is so funny and at the same times it shows all the proof to incredulous people...
ImageImage

Tobletwo
Banned
 
Posts: 144
Joined: May 12, 2010 00:00

Postby Tobletwo » May 18, 2010 17:12

What he said is that paladin gets hit harder with his plate armor, 200 more AF and god know how much more constitution than a pd5 ranger does. Sad but true.

User avatar
Ronian
Phoenix Knight
 
Posts: 1556
Joined: Jan 12, 2008 01:00

Postby Ronian » May 18, 2010 17:14

It is the hib prince with crush damage (sorry for my mistake). I got max about low 800 hits and paladin 100 more maybe. Both armor types are vulnerable to crush. Actually I have to spend 34 realmpoints to be tank like a paladin. Of course vs thrust mobs he hs been better and vs slash mobs the ranger was better. Nowadays after both parry and block are fixed a ranger couldnt compete to fulltanks.

User avatar
realac0
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 548
Joined: May 18, 2010 00:00

Postby realac0 » May 18, 2010 17:19

Ronian wrote:It is the hib prince with crush damage (sorry for my mistake). I got max about low 800 hits and paladin 100 more maybe. Both armor types are vulnerable to crush. Actually I have to spend 34 realmpoints to be tank like a paladin. Of course vs thrust mobs he hs been better and vs slash mobs the ranger was better. Nowadays after both parry and block are fixed a ranger couldnt compete to fulltanks.


... but can easly kill they :lol:

User avatar
Ronian
Phoenix Knight
 
Posts: 1556
Joined: Jan 12, 2008 01:00

Postby Ronian » May 18, 2010 17:23

realac0 wrote:
Ronian wrote:It is the hib prince with crush damage (sorry for my mistake). I got max about low 800 hits and paladin 100 more maybe. Both armor types are vulnerable to crush. Actually I have to spend 34 realmpoints to be tank like a paladin. Of course vs thrust mobs he hs been better and vs slash mobs the ranger was better. Nowadays after both parry and block are fixed a ranger couldnt compete to fulltanks.


... but can easly kill they :lol:


Most paladins cant play and spec slash 8O Thrust is the way to go and a really good paladin was Caroli (even if she was low rr like rr5). Always a hard enemy.

A good paladin is like a good warden, really hard to kill. Even the actives are a really good counter to pd like WoC or AoG.

A good example for a slash high boss is the hib dragon. He made 250 to 450 to me with PD5 when I got agro.

User avatar
Ragabbash
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 270
Joined: Nov 11, 2008 01:00

Postby Ragabbash » May 18, 2010 17:25

Ronian wrote:
vangonaj wrote:
Methusalem wrote:and a point for other hibs :
can u answer me, why ur realmmates search Rangers in broad for tajendi or df-highlordsraids as maintank if ur Ranger isnt a LITTLE oped ?


Is this is true? OMG


Not really. Before block and parryfix Ranger was the best tank with pd5. But the same goes for scout (he is the best ingame because of shieldspec) and maybe hunter.



rolf xD

User avatar
realac0
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 548
Joined: May 18, 2010 00:00

Postby realac0 » May 18, 2010 17:29

Ronian wrote:
realac0 wrote:
Ronian wrote:It is the hib prince with crush damage (sorry for my mistake). I got max about low 800 hits and paladin 100 more maybe. Both armor types are vulnerable to crush. Actually I have to spend 34 realmpoints to be tank like a paladin. Of course vs thrust mobs he hs been better and vs slash mobs the ranger was better. Nowadays after both parry and block are fixed a ranger couldnt compete to fulltanks.


... but can easly kill they :lol:


Most paladins cant play and spec slash 8O Thrust is the way to go and a really good paladin was Caroli (even if she was low rr like rr5). Always a hard enemy.

A good paladin is like a good warden, really hard to kill. Even the actives are a really good counter to pd like WoC or AoG.

A good example for a slash high boss is the hib dragon. He made 250 to 450 to me with PD5 when I got agro.


lol explain me why a good paladin should go thrust ...
slash autotrain
have one of the best anytime of all albion (medium endu decent gr rate and very high bonus to hit). Ametyst slash (lvl 29)
maybe not the best type of damage on resists type but still one of the more "neutral"
pally is not supposed to make damage (even if with 39 2h on hybrid spec shoud make some decent swing, is clear, not here on uthgard ^_^) but is just supposed to be a truck to kill.

sry, on uthgard is not working ^_^ and u know this :twisted:

User avatar
Celad
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 685
Joined: Dec 17, 2009 01:00
Location: Italy

Postby Celad » May 18, 2010 17:29

Ronian wrote:Actually I have to spend 34 realmpoints to be tank like a paladin. Of course vs thrust mobs he hs been better and vs slash mobs the ranger was better.


And we have another one here! :lol:
It's ranger class designed to be a tank? NO!
If with my hunter i spend 34 realmpoints for pd5 can i tank like a warrior? NO!

Ronian wrote:Nowadays after both parry and block are fixed a ranger couldnt compete to fulltanks.


Archers are no fulltanks, they have not to compete with warriors or paladins tanking attitude. But on uthgard they can.

This is the way it has to be:

realac0 wrote:anyway, a good ranger, can kill all, but need really a lot of lucky and skill on ra's use and found the right moment to inc (need to damage a lot with bow before go melee, kite, hide again, bow again, when target 20% health can go melee ... like ALL ARCHERS).


and in fact this morning i killed a low rr a paladin, because i found the right moment to inc, i do a lot of dmg with bow, kite, hide, bow again and when target 20% health i go melee... like ALL ARCHERS
Last edited by Celad on May 18, 2010 17:31, edited 1 time in total.
ImageImage

User avatar
Breeze
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 219
Joined: Feb 06, 2010 01:00

Postby Breeze » May 18, 2010 17:30

OH MY GOD :)
All this worthless whine guys..

The only guy who might have anything to say in this thread is Noir because he plays at rr10 and still without Viper3..

All the other viper3 assasins who whine about ranger PD, should just shut up tbh :)

You _have_ to remember that in ANY patch in DAoC history there has been strong and weak chars..

Yes, rangers are good as it is atm.. Unbeatable, game breaking? Not by a long shot..

Some of the people in this thread are thid gimps rr4l2 who just came out of BG in to big boy rvr..
Now let me tell you, it's not easy to enter emain RvR as a ranger right after BG either..
Your char gets much stronger at rr5 when you get the full L51 effect of your wpns etc, your rr5 ability and so on..
But people just give up, and think that it's rangers fault that they can't gain any rps..

Look at it from a hib perspective for a second..
I have a ranger, i solo atleast 95% of the time, when I came out of BG i couldn't earn ****** rps either, getting trashed by high RR infils with Viper3 all the time and ofc zerged by the elite stealth zerg guilds (wont name any names)..
Sure it ****** me off a lot, but more than anything it just made me think about what I could do to beat those damn infils, i got my ****** together and bought a damage add bracer among other things..
Worked on perfecting my tactics, and even though i still lost many fights vs viper3 assasins (with my oh so overpowered PD) i just kept going, and eventually figured out ways to atleast have a chance..

Now when I'm nearing RR6, i still get my ass handed to me once in a while even though who have ALL 6 relics, which is a huge advantage..
Any good assassin at my rr or higher always stand a chance against me..

We all do what we can to make our chars as strong as possible, rangers specc some PD, assassins go viper.

Now quit ****** :)

User avatar
vangonaj
Alerion Knight
 
Posts: 2497
Joined: Sep 14, 2007 00:00
Location: Galpen

Postby vangonaj » May 18, 2010 17:33

Breeze wrote:We all do what we can to make our chars as strong as possible, rangers specc some PD, assassins go viper.

Now quit [I am a little bunny and like flowers] :)



There are not only assasins in this server. Not all can spec viper 3.
Image

User avatar
realac0
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 548
Joined: May 18, 2010 00:00

Postby realac0 » May 18, 2010 17:37

Breeze wrote:OH MY GOD :)
All this worthless whine guys..

The only guy who might have anything to say in this thread is Noir because he plays at rr10 and still without Viper3..

All the other viper3 assasins who whine about ranger PD, should just shut up tbh :)

You _have_ to remember that in ANY patch in DAoC history there has been strong and weak chars..

Yes, rangers are good as it is atm.. Unbeatable, game breaking? Not by a long shot..

Some of the people in this thread are thid gimps rr4l2 who just came out of BG in to big boy rvr..
Now let me tell you, it's not easy to enter emain RvR as a ranger right after BG either..
Your char gets much stronger at rr5 when you get the full L51 effect of your wpns etc, your rr5 ability and so on..
But people just give up, and think that it's rangers fault that they can't gain any rps..

Look at it from a hib perspective for a second..
I have a ranger, i solo atleast 95% of the time, when I came out of BG i couldn't earn [I am a little bunny and like flowers] rps either, getting trashed by high RR infils with Viper3 all the time and ofc zerged by the elite stealth zerg guilds (wont name any names)..
Sure it [I am a little bunny and like flowers] me off a lot, but more than anything it just made me think about what I could do to beat those damn infils, i got my [I am a little bunny and like flowers] together and bought a damage add bracer among other things..
Worked on perfecting my tactics, and even though i still lost many fights vs viper3 assasins (with my oh so overpowered PD) i just kept going, and eventually figured out ways to atleast have a chance..

Now when I'm nearing RR6, i still get my ass handed to me once in a while even though who have ALL 6 relics, which is a huge advantage..
Any good assassin at my rr or higher always stand a chance against me..

We all do what we can to make our chars as strong as possible, rangers specc some PD, assassins go viper.

Now quit [I am a little bunny and like flowers] :)


you are right man!!!
we are all 4l2 NOOBS that come out from thid!!!

just le me point 1 thing:

for me, the real noobs, are ppl that roll rangers.
for sure are not noobs ppl that play ns's, or hero's.
I am sure that if something will be done, 90% of rangers will quit and start play some other class because will understand that:

running with pd5+ip+rr5 and just spam anytime+conver on side stun
will not work and will need to mutch other things to win.

anyway, now, i quit too, i haven't nothing other to say.

bb
Last edited by realac0 on May 18, 2010 17:40, edited 1 time in total.

PreviousNext

Return to Realm versus Realm

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests

Wednesday, 14. May 2025

Artwork and screen shots Copyright © 2001-2004 Mythic Entertainment, Inc. All rights reserved. Used with permission of Mythic Entertainment. Mythic Entertainment, the Mythic Entertainment logo, "Dark Age of Camelot," "Shrouded Isles," "Foundations," "New Frontiers," "Trials of Atlantis," "Catacombs," "Darkness Rising," the Dark Age of Camelot and subsequent logos, and the stylized Celtic knot are trademarks of Mythic Entertainment, Inc.

Valid XHTML & CSS | Original Design by: LernVid.com | Modified by Uthgard Staff