Ideas to improve the current RvR situation No. X

Talk about your RvR experience here
Zarkor
Unicorn Knight
 
Posts: 3710
Joined: Aug 15, 2006 00:00
Location: Antwerp, Flanders, Belgium

Postby Zarkor » Aug 04, 2010 14:02

DarkRef wrote:how about a lvl 50 BG again?XD


Would even make things worse. :]

User avatar
Jezzmin
Phoenix Knight
 
Posts: 1602
Joined: Mar 11, 2010 01:00

Postby Jezzmin » Aug 04, 2010 15:37

DarkRef wrote:how about a lvl 50 BG again?XD


emain? :lol:

User avatar
tvpro
Myrmidon
 
Posts: 155
Joined: Aug 01, 2009 00:00

Postby tvpro » Aug 04, 2010 16:05

My solution imo:

Introduce RP and xp reward for keep takes, also increase number of mobs and less spawntime for mobs.

This will make it easier for casual players to earn rps. Bring xpers to frontiers(hence the people who hunt them too) and make keeps relevant again.

Zarkor
Unicorn Knight
 
Posts: 3710
Joined: Aug 15, 2006 00:00
Location: Antwerp, Flanders, Belgium

Postby Zarkor » Aug 04, 2010 16:19

tvpro wrote:My solution imo:

Introduce RP and xp reward for keep takes, also increase number of mobs and less spawntime for mobs.

This will make it easier for casual players to earn rps. Bring xpers to frontiers(hence the people who hunt them too) and make keeps relevant again.

In general the fun in DAoC's RvR doesn't lie in the reward, but in fighting (and preferably defeating) enemies. Making keeps give increased RP rewards is only going to be an incentive for WAR-like behaviour where people avoid inc to get their easy and relatively riskless RPs.

Better would be to reward players for taking keeps with a lot of resistance or fending off keepsieges, with an extra bonus when your guild has that keep claimed or something.


I agree with the mobs overhaul and need for xpers in the frontiers though.

User avatar
Finalement
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 963
Joined: Mar 30, 2010 00:00

Postby Finalement » Aug 04, 2010 18:00

Zarkor wrote:
tvpro wrote:My solution imo:

Introduce RP and xp reward for keep takes, also increase number of mobs and less spawntime for mobs.

This will make it easier for casual players to earn rps. Bring xpers to frontiers(hence the people who hunt them too) and make keeps relevant again.

In general the fun in DAoC's RvR doesn't lie in the reward, but in fighting (and preferably defeating) enemies. Making keeps give increased RP rewards is only going to be an incentive for WAR-like behaviour where people avoid inc to get their easy and relatively riskless RPs.

Better would be to reward players for taking keeps with a lot of resistance or fending off keepsieges, with an extra bonus when your guild has that keep claimed or something.


I agree with the mobs overhaul and need for xpers in the frontiers though.


Or give a RP-bonus in OF from rr1L1 to rr5/6. Or a bonus for high RR kills. The higher the RR of the killed, the higher the bonus.

User avatar
darmas
Myrmidon
 
Posts: 69
Joined: Jun 16, 2009 00:00
Location: Copenhagen

Postby darmas » Aug 04, 2010 18:18

Finalement wrote:Or give a RP-bonus in OF from rr1L1 to rr5/6. Or a bonus for high RR kills. The higher the RR of the killed, the higher the bonus.


isnt this already implemented? it used to be like that on live.
you kill a rr2 you get around 980rps.
you kill a rr7 you get around 1250rps.

atleast tahts what i remember.

User avatar
Finalement
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 963
Joined: Mar 30, 2010 00:00

Postby Finalement » Aug 04, 2010 19:50

darmas wrote:
Finalement wrote:Or give a RP-bonus in OF from rr1L1 to rr5/6. Or a bonus for high RR kills. The higher the RR of the killed, the higher the bonus.


isnt this already implemented? it used to be like that on live.
you kill a rr2 you get around 980rps.
you kill a rr7 you get around 1250rps.

atleast tahts what i remember.


Yes sure, the higher RR is within the RP-formula since dawn of time, but I mean a additional bonus to make RvR more attractive.

Zarkor
Unicorn Knight
 
Posts: 3710
Joined: Aug 15, 2006 00:00
Location: Antwerp, Flanders, Belgium

Postby Zarkor » Aug 05, 2010 00:10

Finalement wrote:
darmas wrote:
Finalement wrote:Or give a RP-bonus in OF from rr1L1 to rr5/6. Or a bonus for high RR kills. The higher the RR of the killed, the higher the bonus.

isnt this already implemented?

Yes sure, the higher RR is within the RP-formula since dawn of time, but I mean a additional bonus to make RvR more attractive.

I don't think an RP bonus would be necessary. I'm quite satisfied with how fast RR1-5 really is. There's no need to speed it up by implementing bonusses for goals that can be achieved just as well in another way. Besides, RP bonusses will most likely get declined by the staff anyway.

I do believe extra PvP XP bonuses in the frontiers are still the best shot at providing weaker players more incentive to RvR.

User avatar
Herm666
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 571
Joined: Jan 31, 2008 01:00

Postby Herm666 » Aug 05, 2010 01:11

I dont see the point of the QQ / Offtopic ...

Today there were MANY players out!
Even zerg vs zerg or zerg vs group AND - without difficulty - 8vs8 ...

You guys make mountains out of molehills ...
aylwynn warden
Image

Zarkor
Unicorn Knight
 
Posts: 3710
Joined: Aug 15, 2006 00:00
Location: Antwerp, Flanders, Belgium

Postby Zarkor » Aug 05, 2010 01:23

Herm666 wrote:I dont see the point of the QQ / Offtopic ...

Today there were MANY players out!
Even zerg vs zerg or zerg vs group AND - without difficulty - 8vs8 ...

You guys make mountains out of molehills ...


It's just a discussion on how to improve RvR on the server, just like the proposal of Bloodwyne. I don't think anyone here is actually whining about anything. :P

User avatar
Herm666
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 571
Joined: Jan 31, 2008 01:00

Postby Herm666 » Aug 05, 2010 01:30

Zarkor wrote:
Herm666 wrote:I dont see the point of the QQ / Offtopic ...

Today there were MANY players out!
Even zerg vs zerg or zerg vs group AND - without difficulty - 8vs8 ...

You guys make mountains out of molehills ...


It's just a discussion on how to improve RvR on the server, just like the proposal of Bloodwyne. I don't think anyone here is actually whining about anything. :P


I just can read whining about 8-men-mentality and Highrr's - So ... Just offtopic.
aylwynn warden
Image

User avatar
Archonis
Myrmidon
 
Posts: 130
Joined: Apr 13, 2009 00:00
Location: Hamburg, Wiesbaden, Tübingen

Postby Archonis » Aug 05, 2010 04:34

i dont see the rvr needs an improvement which wasnt there in classic times.
I think the best way for uthgard, if the demand is to have a "Classic Server", is: just do it like it was in classic.
It's the wrong way to implement new innovative features, just go back, step by step till we have the gold old daoc.


What i see is things i miss which arent implemented yet on uthgard but were so in classic times:

- dependency of the relic keep of the number of claimed keeps of the owning realm.

- crafters high level materials only in the frontier keeps (think it was the relic keeps)

- a solution with the issue of buff pots because , imho, they bring a imbalance in the game which disadvantages buffing and self buffing classes.

- old ra's

(- old chat channel system, which imho affects the rvr, too)
Die beiden wichtigsten Gebote:

1. Liebe den Herrn, deinen Gott, von ganzem Herzen, mit deinem ganzen Willen und mit deinem ganzen Verstand!
2. Liebe deinen Mitmenschen wie dich selbst!

[i]Mt 22, 37ff.[/i]

Zarkor
Unicorn Knight
 
Posts: 3710
Joined: Aug 15, 2006 00:00
Location: Antwerp, Flanders, Belgium

Postby Zarkor » Aug 05, 2010 11:29

Archonis wrote:i dont see the rvr needs an improvement which wasnt there in classic times.
I think the best way for uthgard, if the demand is to have a "Classic Server", is: just do it like it was in classic.
It's the wrong way to implement new innovative features, just go back, step by step till we have the gold old daoc.

If we could recreate the lack of player knowledge about the game, the amount of servers and players on those servers etc etc, I'd agree with you, but since then the players and even the game itself has evolved tremendously. We all know now how things could or should be done. The way people play this game has changed so drasticly that you can't expect to recreate the gold old classic times just by mimicking the old setting. It just won't pan out the way it used to..

That's also why det for hybrids and a nearsight re-balancing is needed so much in order to prevent obivous imbalances which WILL get exploited more than we'd like.

User avatar
Archonis
Myrmidon
 
Posts: 130
Joined: Apr 13, 2009 00:00
Location: Hamburg, Wiesbaden, Tübingen

Postby Archonis » Aug 05, 2010 13:39

ok, in the last point with det i agree. nearsight maybe.
But this are mainly balance probems.
Sure, in classic there were balance problems, thats the reaseon why there were many patches on balance issues.

But i mean, in the whole thing, uthgard should just go back to the roots, cause that's what a lot of players want.
I dont mean to maintain all the balance problems: if there is a unplayable class , staff can improve it for example. Or if det is desperately needed for some hybrid classes, staff can think about to implement it.

but things like the relic keep dependency of keep status, crafters material in keeps etc, this are not balance issues in the main, so on this points uth can easily go back to the roots.

if many ppl dont remember how all this was, maybe it's possible to get the old patch notes ? I will try this in the future, cause for me it's a fun to work on this.
Die beiden wichtigsten Gebote:

1. Liebe den Herrn, deinen Gott, von ganzem Herzen, mit deinem ganzen Willen und mit deinem ganzen Verstand!
2. Liebe deinen Mitmenschen wie dich selbst!

[i]Mt 22, 37ff.[/i]

User avatar
holsten-knight
Lion Knight
 
Posts: 4449
Joined: Jul 15, 2009 00:00
Location: Hamburg

Postby holsten-knight » Aug 05, 2010 14:04

there was a thread about extra relic guards and the old system bla bla

http://uthgard-server.net/modules.php?n ... 052#128052

blue asked for screenshots of the old extra uber relic guards with the guild tag under the name.

I couldn't find old screenshots (hard disc crash) and don't know what has become of this... but the thread soon has it's first anniversary and nothing changed so far :)

this is not mend as criticism, as no one works for money on this server and it still is a lot of fun, even with all the bugs.
I just wanted to say i guess it's on the list and done when it's done :wink:

edit: doh... wrong thread, too many open windows :? but as it was adressed here also i let it be

PreviousNext

Return to Realm versus Realm

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests

Wednesday, 14. May 2025

Artwork and screen shots Copyright © 2001-2004 Mythic Entertainment, Inc. All rights reserved. Used with permission of Mythic Entertainment. Mythic Entertainment, the Mythic Entertainment logo, "Dark Age of Camelot," "Shrouded Isles," "Foundations," "New Frontiers," "Trials of Atlantis," "Catacombs," "Darkness Rising," the Dark Age of Camelot and subsequent logos, and the stylized Celtic knot are trademarks of Mythic Entertainment, Inc.

Valid XHTML & CSS | Original Design by: LernVid.com | Modified by Uthgard Staff