Bug list - confirmed and unconfirmed

Older threads and posts that still may be useful to some
Zarkor
Unicorn Knight
 
Posts: 3710
Joined: Aug 15, 2006 00:00
Location: Antwerp, Flanders, Belgium

Postby Zarkor » Oct 05, 2009 18:53

Nayru wrote:
panachier wrote:yeah the todo list is a bad idea, but do you think that a stick that regroup all the bug already reported and the one that need a confirmation is a bad idea?


To be honest it's in most cases redundant information. If we do not comment on a bugreport or if we just say "ok", you can be sure that we have added it to our bugtracking system. If there are bugreports that are almost useless, we comment on them why they are useless. So summing up bugreports once again does not really help us. The only thing such threads cause are unclear forums.


It helps the community... :roll:

User avatar
panachier
Banned
 
Posts: 2267
Joined: Apr 04, 2006 00:00

Postby panachier » Oct 05, 2009 23:23

Nayru wrote:
panachier wrote:yeah the todo list is a bad idea, but do you think that a stick that regroup all the bug already reported and the one that need a confirmation is a bad idea?


To be honest it's in most cases redundant information. If we do not comment on a bugreport or if we just say "ok", you can be sure that we have added it to our bugtracking system. If there are bugreports that are almost useless, we comment on them why they are useless. So summing up bugreports once again does not really help us. The only thing such threads cause are unclear forums.


that can at least helps moderator in them work to not delete or edit a 5th post about volley that is 5 time the same discution.

that helps to have a look at the work that is done by the staff when you'll see some [fixed] beside the bugs. and so maybe people will stop complaining about what you do.

and maybe with the links the bug report won't be forgoten, tests can be done more easily. a "check bug team " could be created and the " must be check bug list" will be classified in bug or not bug...

and that can help to have a cleaner forum ;-) ... but it's pana's idea... so...
<img src="http://www.fallenearth.fr/daoc/daoc2.php?player=Panachou">

nixian
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 5450
Joined: May 19, 2006 00:00

Postby nixian » Oct 05, 2009 23:29

less discussing and more thread finding for:


-archery/bolt not affected by Z axe
-pet that can go on walls without stairs
-circle around TK doesnt destealth in agra
-necro has to be totaly done
-pet damage are to low
-theu RR5 is affected by stoicism and resists
-bolt damage is not correct
-using gtae, bomb, insta aura, transfer life, ... put you in fight and break speed even if you dont hit anything
-HoG drains mana everytime the target is hit

and

-charge + ranger RR5 = stun?
-volley should hit a target only once
-realm speed should break if pet is in fight
-miss rate of pet is really to high
-caba's pet speed buff shouldn't break when pet in fight

:p

User avatar
panachier
Banned
 
Posts: 2267
Joined: Apr 04, 2006 00:00

Postby panachier » Oct 06, 2009 00:12

i added some link... but i even don't know if such work is usefull...

would'nt it be easier that a staff member agree that the bug i listed in the "bug list" are known as official bugs. if some are not i could find some statement they did or test that already be done.

maybe just edit my post and nixian's post with some coloured words to tell us which ones are known bug, which one need to be check and which ones need more information to help you to fix them...
<img src="http://www.fallenearth.fr/daoc/daoc2.php?player=Panachou">

nixian
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 5450
Joined: May 19, 2006 00:00

Postby nixian » Oct 06, 2009 00:16

good work pana :)

and yes if some staff member have spare 5-10 minutes some time it would be nice with a little comment

User avatar
Lintu
Phoenix Knight
 
Posts: 1188
Joined: Oct 11, 2008 00:00

Postby Lintu » Oct 06, 2009 10:01

TWF ticks too slow (only half the times) - confirmed for twf2 and 3 at least

nixian
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 5450
Joined: May 19, 2006 00:00

Postby nixian » Oct 06, 2009 10:03

Lintu wrote:TWF ticks too slow (only half the times) - confirmed for twf2 and 3 at least


do you have a link? :)

User avatar
Lintu
Phoenix Knight
 
Posts: 1188
Joined: Oct 11, 2008 00:00

Postby Lintu » Oct 06, 2009 17:47

nixian wrote:
Lintu wrote:TWF ticks too slow (only half the times) - confirmed for twf2 and 3 at least


do you have a link? :)


Beneath my personal tests on the Reavers "Lintusotasta" (twf2) and "Cifer" (twf3) I can give you this link of a bug report:
http://uthgard-server.net/modules.php?n ... ic&t=10939

edit: Im letzten Posting des gelinkten Threads ist der Bug sogar von Nayru bestätigt (bzw akzeptiert ^^)

nixian
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 5450
Joined: May 19, 2006 00:00

Postby nixian » Oct 06, 2009 22:41

ty ;) ill add it to the list

User avatar
Krinton3
Myrmidon
 
Posts: 196
Joined: Nov 13, 2007 01:00

Postby Krinton3 » Oct 14, 2009 03:53

-Resists rates too high
-Mastery of Focus seems to have almost no effect

They need tests but should still be added to the list.

User avatar
Tumi
Myrmidon
 
Posts: 97
Joined: Aug 21, 2009 00:00

Postby Tumi » Oct 14, 2009 10:19

Anyone know if the lvl 25 scythe style is fixed? It should block ranged attacks, but i think i wasn't working.
<img src="http://opakwertheim.mine.nu/sig.php?chars=Itana;Jasu;Mosa">

User avatar
panachier
Banned
 
Posts: 2267
Joined: Apr 04, 2006 00:00

Postby panachier » Oct 14, 2009 20:02

@tumi just a tip, please test and then post a link to a topic that you create or one that already exist... please avoid "polution" topics here...
<img src="http://www.fallenearth.fr/daoc/daoc2.php?player=Panachou">

User avatar
Blue
Developer
Developer
 
Posts: 15829
Joined: Apr 22, 2005 00:00

Postby Blue » Oct 14, 2009 22:24

Krinton3 wrote:-Resists rates too high
-Mastery of Focus seems to have almost no effect

They need tests but should still be added to the list.


There are threads in the forum for that. Mastery of focus works and resist rates are adapted to live tests. I doubt you will find differences.

Please to all, a bug with just assumptions is no bug until there is real proof that its wrong. Spell resist rates were tested on live and implemented on Uthgard to match these live rates.

DON'T CLAIM ITS A BUG WITHOUT PROOF FOR IT.

Hint: Everybody can create trial accounts on US servers and log into Pendragon to test things.
It's done when it's done. Thanks for your patience.
Every bug gets fixed. Sooner or later.

"It is an inescapable law of nature that the amount of satisfaction one gains from achieving something
is related to how hard it is and easy things can only elicit a fleeting superficial sort of pleasure."


Blue says, "you used macro tools or macro keyboard"
Pala says, "i am disabled. and i have a mechanic left hand that can be programed. its hard to play woith one hand"

[Appeal] Bxxxxxxxx: "why is RA first aid cann man i stealth use and not unstealth cann man ra if man use unstealth ?????????"
BannedUser: "i was not using automate game action my hand was fall on keyboard during i was sleep .... i was completly fall on keyboard ..."

User avatar
panachier
Banned
 
Posts: 2267
Joined: Apr 04, 2006 00:00

Postby panachier » Oct 14, 2009 23:03

for the ones that want more precision about how to check bugs.

http://www.uthgard-server.net/modules.p ... ic&t=13239
<img src="http://www.fallenearth.fr/daoc/daoc2.php?player=Panachou">

User avatar
Krinton3
Myrmidon
 
Posts: 196
Joined: Nov 13, 2007 01:00

Postby Krinton3 » Oct 15, 2009 22:53

There's a bug, Blue, I think most would agree on this. I appreciate that you did tests, but there is still a problem. I shouldn't be getting capped resists vs. a level 50 mob when using MoF II and a level 35 spell, which I have gotten in tests. Unfortunately I am wasting my time saying this as I lost my tests, went LD and the log didn't save. My computer can't handle capital cities :lol: .

Hint: Everybody can create trial accounts on US servers and log into Pendragon to test things.


Lol, you suggest this hint to me? :)

I am the one who wrote several long paragraphs about a test system on Uthgard which you replied to with "There is a chance of a leak, we need trust to give this ability", and then didn't explain further.

I want to test it but I already wasted a very long time casting the same spell 500 times without any kind of power restoration. If you want proof, help me get proof, don't tell me to get proof, and then tell me you don't trust people to use a testing area because "there is a chance of a leak"

-

And in addition, look at the topic title "confirmed or unconfirmed" it doesn't have to be confirmed in order for it to be added to this list.

There are complaints of this bug -> It is added to the list to be tested (re-tested if need be) -> It can be removed from the list if fixed or proven wrong

PreviousNext

Return to English Archive

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

Tuesday, 09. June 2026

Artwork and screen shots Copyright © 2001-2004 Mythic Entertainment, Inc. All rights reserved. Used with permission of Mythic Entertainment. Mythic Entertainment, the Mythic Entertainment logo, "Dark Age of Camelot," "Shrouded Isles," "Foundations," "New Frontiers," "Trials of Atlantis," "Catacombs," "Darkness Rising," the Dark Age of Camelot and subsequent logos, and the stylized Celtic knot are trademarks of Mythic Entertainment, Inc.

Valid XHTML & CSS | Original Design by: LernVid.com | Modified by Uthgard Staff