Hello,

Im planning in leveling a nature Druid on Uthgard and im wondering about the best spec for that. right now i have 2 different specs, and because im too poor for respecs i ask for your opinion.

1. spec celt druid 15dex 10 emp

Heal 31
Buff 25
Nature 36

2. spec spec celt druid 15dex 10 emp

Heal 35
Buff 19
Nature 36

1. Version gives better ghetto buffs+resists+better basebuffs for smallscale pvp and my pet+other pets.

2. version gives better heals like 75% group instant, better group heal and better single target heal.

Are the heals worth taking? Because im already confused about the insanely high manadrain. Is the Groupheal or greater heal even usable?

i don't think I would run a nature spec unless I was a 3rd druid. That said, I would probably go either 40 regrow 36 nature. If you are trying to run in 2 druid groups, I think its hard to justify dropping buffs below 34. That way you could at least do yellow SC, and with 30 regrow you'd still be able to get 29 nature for the blue AE root and ST insta root.

If you have to leave nature at 36 and also want to be buffing, then I guess your first spec is better, but I think I would just farm for a single line and respec nature down lower. Or run with 3 druids.

Why can hibs and albs play with 2 buffers and hib not?
Not to mention mids also have to buff endurance.

Been running a Nature druid for years on live, am also new to the server and going this direction.
I had the most success with 41 Reg 32 Nat 14 Nurt (Just enough to cover specs, with massive heals)... when I knew I didnt have to buff at all went 40 Reg 36 Nat for the extra grp insta-root. You'll live alot longer and be able to keep people breathing on those specs, even if they whine about buffs.

- Grimaldi

Tirax wrote:Why can hibs and albs play with 2 buffers and hib not?
Not to mention mids also have to buff endurance.

you can,youll just be filling in with AEs or charges.

There is no objective reason to run a nature druid.

I would not invite a nature druid, if there is a decent buff druid available.

Sveya wrote:There is no objective reason to run a nature druid.

I would not invite a nature druid, if there is a decent buff druid available.

Lol. A well played nature druid backed up by a good heal/buff druid is extremely powerful.

Of course having such a duo is quite rare...

Zarkor wrote:

Sveya wrote:There is no objective reason to run a nature druid.

I would not invite a nature druid, if there is a decent buff druid available.

Lol. A well played nature druid backed up by a good heal/buff druid is extremely powerful.

Of course having such a duo is quite rare...

I play nature and its not extremely powerful:P just better pet and a higher aoe root. insta roots on 10 min timer, meh. but its better than not having a nature druid i guess.

Sveya wrote:There is no objective reason to run a nature druid.

I would not invite a nature druid, if there is a decent buff druid available.

aha, n why?

Sveya wrote:There is no objective reason to run a nature druid.

I would not invite a nature druid, if there is a decent buff druid available.

lol

you re very wellcome as nature druid in our *semi fixed* caster grps,...

as long as you are able be SL , and throw insta ae root in time , so its useful
voice communication required ofc too ;P
36/40 is fine imo

But Again why 36/40?
Is the diffenrce in heals that big? i thought they drain way to much mana?


Heal 31
Buff 25
Nature 36

seems like a good spec to me, the specbuffs are at least better than AoE buffs. And Pets like druid/chanter/ment could be buffed too.

100% rez is nice for a castergroup.

about buffs, if they are not at least yellow, they wont make a difference.