Savage vs Berserker

Public communication platform for all Midgard players.
zHarvest
Warder
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Jun 01, 2016 01:17

Postby zHarvest » Apr 04, 2017 04:03

Hi guys,

I waited a while before asking that, waiting for people get confidence with that Patch and with the new Server.

What do you think currently about Savages compared to Berserkers?

Ruckuz1983
Myrmidon
 
Posts: 62
Joined: Mar 13, 2017 23:54

Postby Ruckuz1983 » Apr 04, 2017 06:32

savage is more dps but you need the PF the zerker brings...
Infection 50 Shaman
Alliant 50 Runemaster

User avatar
Gil
Alerion Knight
 
Posts: 2061
Joined: Jan 06, 2010 01:00
Location: Denmark

Postby Gil » Apr 04, 2017 20:23

They're both good. Play the one that best fits your play style.
Gil DaTroll - Merlin Zerker | MacDeath - Uth1 Armsman | Gil - Uth2 Zerker | Macdeath - Uth2 Armsman
Image

User avatar
majky666
Phoenix Knight
 
Posts: 1470
Joined: Feb 10, 2010 01:00

Postby majky666 » Apr 04, 2017 21:36

Here are couple threads about the same. There are discussed pros and cons.
Image

User avatar
NCR
Myrmidon
 
Posts: 61
Joined: Jan 03, 2010 01:00

Postby NCR » Apr 07, 2017 16:32

i play savage and a guildmate play zerk.

We are both templated and

savage
-Hit more harder than zerk because can use Thrust damage, dual hit near 50% (triple + quad are so amazing but too rare)
-Can easy split and finish target quickly (self endu+self hate)
-Can tank really better (50% resist cac with self)

But : Hand2hand = 2hand weapon so can be easy block (snif)

berserker
-Dual wield = always hit with 2 weapons
-Hammer = snare (savage can too but need a specific spec)
-Zerk mod = amazing damage but can be easy down

So in fact : zerk = more stable dps / savage = bigger dps
zerk = more easy to play / savage = more funny

imo : in a team with 3 dps : ZERK + SAVAGE + SAVAGE , with 2 dps ZERK + SAVAGE

Do your choice now :)

jenskamen
Myrmidon
 
Posts: 120
Joined: Mar 09, 2017 14:00

Postby jenskamen » Apr 07, 2017 16:42

NCR wrote:i play savage and a guildmate play zerk.

We are both templated and

savage
-Hit more harder than zerk because can use Thrust damage, dual hit near 50% (triple + quad are so amazing but too rare)
-Can easy split and finish target quickly (self endu+self hate)
-Can tank really better (50% resist cac with self)

But : Hand2hand = 2hand weapon so can be easy block (snif)

berserker
-Dual wield = always hit with 2 weapons
-Hammer = snare (savage can too but need a specific spec)
-Zerk mod = amazing damage but can be easy down

So in fact : zerk = more stable dps / savage = bigger dps
zerk = more easy to play / savage = more funny

imo : in a team with 3 dps : ZERK + SAVAGE + SAVAGE , with 2 dps ZERK + SAVAGE

Do your choice now :)


I have two questions from a leveling standpoint.
#1
How good is solo exping on him since selfbuffs that cost HP i assume only give you more downtime, so you play without!?

#2
At what level does he become tankier than a zerker (i assume without selfbuffs because #1?)?

User avatar
NCR
Myrmidon
 
Posts: 61
Joined: Jan 03, 2010 01:00

Postby NCR » Apr 10, 2017 09:35

Both are weak tank in solo..... SAVAGE : u need only use esquive + haste + add damage so 15% life on yellow, and maybe the mobs hit u one time (with good stuff)
Berzerker : the mob will hit u maybe 3/4 times but....u spend more endurance...

So down time are really close imo.


next 35 savage is really good tank in group..... but.... taunt style sucks versus damage style, sometimes it s hard to keep aggro.

User avatar
Groovechamp
Warder
 
Posts: 18
Joined: Jul 06, 2010 00:00

Postby Groovechamp » Jun 09, 2017 08:32

Another nice tool for Savages is 360° evade (unless something was changed there too), which, at least back in the ol' days, was nice when you had several melee people attacking you - I even think you could dodge arrows as well. IIRC, Sav is really more about ALL-IN kamikaze, which is kinda fun.

SAV has more animations per style, compared to the same LA swing of Zerker.

Not sure about Zerker. Because I never really got to play one other than a Valk zerk (lol). She was damn fun actually and it was great to see the whines when you beat somebody with something that can't walk normal :D!

This is not to denounce zerkers though. Just other thoughts related to SAV.

Somebody might need to correct me, but was h2h STR or STR/DEX?

User avatar
majky666
Phoenix Knight
 
Posts: 1470
Joined: Feb 10, 2010 01:00

Postby majky666 » Jun 09, 2017 16:57

Groovechamp wrote:Another nice tool for Savages is 360° evade (unless something was changed there too), which, at least back in the ol' days, was nice when you had several melee people attacking you - I even think you could dodge arrows as well. IIRC, Sav is really more about ALL-IN kamikaze, which is kinda fun.

SAV has more animations per style, compared to the same LA swing of Zerker.

Not sure about Zerker. Because I never really got to play one other than a Valk zerk (lol). She was damn fun actually and it was great to see the whines when you beat somebody with something that can't walk normal :D!

This is not to denounce zerkers though. Just other thoughts related to SAV.

Somebody might need to correct me, but was h2h STR or STR/DEX?

H2H is str/2+dex/2
Image


Return to Midgard

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 5 guests

Friday, 02. May 2025

Artwork and screen shots Copyright © 2001-2004 Mythic Entertainment, Inc. All rights reserved. Used with permission of Mythic Entertainment. Mythic Entertainment, the Mythic Entertainment logo, "Dark Age of Camelot," "Shrouded Isles," "Foundations," "New Frontiers," "Trials of Atlantis," "Catacombs," "Darkness Rising," the Dark Age of Camelot and subsequent logos, and the stylized Celtic knot are trademarks of Mythic Entertainment, Inc.

Valid XHTML & CSS | Original Design by: LernVid.com | Modified by Uthgard Staff