What class is lacking in numbers?
4 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|
I'm sure there's already ten billion of such topics, but in the two seconds I took to check I didn't find them. Plus they'd probably be outdated. Or not.
Anyways... I got bored IRL and decided to start playing here. Thus far I've been playing a pala, which has worked out well enough. My problem, however, is that there seem to be plenty of pala's around. And therefor, as I can't be arsed sitting in CS or wherever for donkey's years, unable to get a group, I'd like to figure out what class is actually lacking in numbers, if any. So far I got the impression there aren't too many mercs/sorcs around, though I haven't gotten to 50 yet and so haven't really seen who's out and about in rvr. Sooooo, basicly, to quit making a short story long, I'm just wondering what class would most likely get me some rvr action. |
|
I'll reply with my impressions. Sorcs and clerics always get group. But playing a sorc, imo, is only to be done if you have good skills. All main cc classes get the blame when rvr goes wrong.
Clerics is your safest bet tbh. |
|
seems all char is ok...isn't so hard form grp in agra atm..ofc cleric and sorc are basic for grp, but pala is nice too, he got endu (for tank grp is needed) and for defense on any grp, if u like pala, u can do this. ihmo char less grped here are wizards, friar and sometime armsman..all other are ok in a grp
|
|
There is always a lack of Sorcs.
Clerics hmm not as much as Sorcs. Tanks with det and det. Yes there are a lot mercs but only few are groupspeced. Cablist a few are active sitting on twinks. But as far as i have seen not many main-char cabalists. Same goes for Theurgs. Greetz Nes Inactive
|
4 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests