Edging closer

Here you can comment on news articles.
User avatar
Jerrian
Phoenix Knight
 
Posts: 1430
Joined: Jan 21, 2010 01:00

Postby Jerrian » Dec 17, 2016 20:00

-l- Edgtho -l- wrote:
Lilayn wrote:It is possible that you think about reimplement capial porters to porter keep until si capitals are not implemented?

I think its a minimal temporary custom change with zero gameplay imbalance and extremely helpful for everyone on that server

Im ok with every 1.65 change but this one is really annoying and just temporary.

Maybe as small gift ;)



guess we are intended to travel to SI without a porter. i will live with that decision.


Maybe you got him wrong or I did, with SI you ´ll have a bind and porter and portal to the important places :-D. Due that SI should be part at relaunch and it ´s not because it ´s not finished yet, we don ´t have access to this porter so Lilayn is not wrong about his question ;-) .

tamiko
Warder
 
Posts: 35
Joined: Mar 05, 2013 11:32

Postby tamiko » Dec 17, 2016 23:18

oO

all theese questions to add/implement stuff to make everything easier... - Ywain's that way ---->>

User avatar
barto22
Phoenix Knight
 
Posts: 1489
Joined: Feb 06, 2011 23:07

Postby barto22 » Dec 17, 2016 23:35

tamiko wrote:oO

all theese questions to add/implement stuff to make everything easier... - Ywain's that way ---->>


Perhaps you were not paying attention, but nobody has asked for anything to be easier.
My mind’s made up, don’t confuse me with facts.
You mustn't assume that your personal situation is a reflection of every other person that has logged in to Uthgard.

Larko
Warder
 
Posts: 26
Joined: Apr 12, 2016 21:26

Postby Larko » Dec 18, 2016 00:21

Agree with the above. SI provided a way to teleport around much easier to the porter keep and existed in 1.65. Can we please add a temporary porter until SI is implemented to work as intended?

User avatar
stimulus
Guardian
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Jan 27, 2007 01:00

Postby stimulus » Dec 18, 2016 22:44

Also agree, porters do make sense...

User avatar
Kazyo
Myrmidon
 
Posts: 88
Joined: May 07, 2016 03:01
Location: Phoenix, AZ

Postby Kazyo » Dec 19, 2016 07:20

+1 for Porters

User avatar
Ensley03
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 384
Joined: Sep 16, 2011 21:44

Postby Ensley03 » Dec 19, 2016 07:24

+2 for porters
Charades <Buds>
#1 pet abuser

isocleas2
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 332
Joined: Apr 11, 2016 22:13

Postby isocleas2 » Dec 19, 2016 08:19

I don't see the harm in implementing something that will eventually in time be added anyways.

+3 for porters

User avatar
silenced
Phoenix Knight
 
Posts: 1072
Joined: Sep 28, 2006 00:00

Postby silenced » Dec 19, 2016 10:18

Will there be multiplayer in this game? =)
Albion Forever!

User avatar
Synderen
Myrmidon
 
Posts: 117
Joined: Jan 14, 2008 01:00

Postby Synderen » Dec 19, 2016 10:23

+4 for porters

Amisch
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 336
Joined: Jun 12, 2007 00:00

Postby Amisch » Dec 19, 2016 11:37

Thanks for the frequent updates in recent weeks, its a joy to read all that!

Kha
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 462
Joined: Jul 03, 2016 18:16

Postby Kha » Dec 19, 2016 11:40

+5 for porters, and +1 to fix pet classes before launch, they are totally screwed for now.

Good luck.

User avatar
Herzog
Myrmidon
 
Posts: 75
Joined: May 01, 2016 12:24

Postby Herzog » Dec 19, 2016 13:12

+6 for porters.
and +1 for a livelike-map
and +1 for release in Frontiers and Battlegrounds
and +1 for more then 1 charge on alchemist-potions
and +1 for rvr-missions
and +1 for a working realm-map

Hmm, i think uthgard like in the old days with nf+new-ra's was the very best freeshard. No toa, no bb's but a lot of action in battlegrounds and in the frontiers/agramon. I loved it so much: i want it back pls ;(

moha
Myrmidon
 
Posts: 113
Joined: Apr 22, 2016 19:16

Postby moha » Dec 19, 2016 13:33

tbh you all know that won't happen

User avatar
Kiruto
Myrmidon
 
Posts: 125
Joined: Dec 01, 2008 01:00

Postby Kiruto » Dec 19, 2016 19:30

Too much classical can kill it :(

Anyway, I remember I moved on Genesis when Uthgard's staff decided to troll us by changing everything on the game before the shutdown. And now, I thought it was a bad idea.

Lets hope we can get Herald and some good thing as the past. I don't really care of the rest, it's Blue's dream to have a full classical like that. It's not our server, but the way the staff took now it much good. They finally start to use the News forum and they try to explain things they choose.

Continue like that!

The best part of the server was NF short map, custom TP and with all the action in Agramon. I can still remember some fight in my head. I never had the same feeling with old frontier maps.

PreviousNext

Return to News

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests

Tuesday, 16. April 2024

Artwork and screen shots Copyright © 2001-2004 Mythic Entertainment, Inc. All rights reserved. Used with permission of Mythic Entertainment. Mythic Entertainment, the Mythic Entertainment logo, "Dark Age of Camelot," "Shrouded Isles," "Foundations," "New Frontiers," "Trials of Atlantis," "Catacombs," "Darkness Rising," the Dark Age of Camelot and subsequent logos, and the stylized Celtic knot are trademarks of Mythic Entertainment, Inc.

Valid XHTML & CSS | Original Design by: LernVid.com | Modified by Uthgard Staff