Uthgard • View topic - Winter is coming!

Winter is coming!

272 posts • Page 5 of 19 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 19

Seksy Eagle Knight Posts: 922 Joined: Nov 21, 2012 08:44	by Seksy » Nov 24, 2015 14:06 Abydos wrote:No I guess DF is still ok for seals, and worm. Also I wonder if we will have Lilith the demon queen boss? Last edited by Seksy on Nov 24, 2015 14:12, edited 1 time in total.

Jarqo Eagle Knight Posts: 565 Joined: Jul 09, 2012 16:02 Location: Uthgard,Hibernia	by Jarqo » Nov 24, 2015 14:07 Seksy wrote: Abydos wrote:No I guess DF is still ok for seals, and worm. Also I wonder if we will have the Lilith the demon queen boss? No Best Sniper Ranger on Uthgard since 2007. Looking for maps? Try http://jarqo91.wix.com/daoccamps

Nogi Warder Posts: 48 Joined: Feb 26, 2014 13:12	by Nogi » Nov 24, 2015 15:14 log in read the news feelin happy log out waiting... waiting... waiting... waiting... waiting... waiting... waiting... waiting... waiting... waiting... waiting... waiting... waiting... waiting... waiting... waiting...

spkeck Warder Posts: 37 Joined: Apr 05, 2012 05:33	by spkeck » Nov 24, 2015 17:10 YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

Neuro Warder Posts: 14 Joined: Feb 11, 2014 22:32	by Neuro » Nov 24, 2015 17:34 Thanks for the update!

Abydos Game Master Posts: 6839 Joined: Jan 22, 2011 21:14	by Abydos » Nov 24, 2015 19:18 Seksy wrote: Abydos wrote:No I guess DF is still ok for seals, and worm. Also I wonder if we will have Lilith the demon queen boss? No, Lilith came much, much later.

relvinian Phoenix Knight Posts: 1722 Joined: Oct 16, 2012 08:25	by relvinian » Nov 24, 2015 21:31 Winter is coming but Uthgard isn't. See you in the summer for the next news! https://www.uthgard.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=37632 Players can greatly contribute to a server if you let them. Uthgard, still the best server. Thanks, Devs.

Juri Eagle Knight Posts: 766 Joined: Mar 10, 2011 03:18	by Juri » Nov 24, 2015 21:46 relvinian wrote:Winter is coming but Uthgard isn't. See you in the summer for the next news!

Umori Guardian Posts: 2 Joined: Sep 04, 2008 00:00	by Umori » Nov 24, 2015 23:46 Cool ! Cu soon Nosta

Neoticus Guardian Posts: 2 Joined: Apr 21, 2014 23:44	by Neoticus » Nov 25, 2015 01:30 Remember, u should really focus on having a stable launch and no regular crashes like Genesis had, that really killed much of the population imo.

Amph INVADER Posts: 0 Joined: Nov 24, 2015 11:41	by Amph » Nov 25, 2015 02:25 Kick ass devs, thanks for the continued hard work. We've waited 2 years, we can wait... or until Camelot Unchained comes out.

Ashi INVADER Posts: 0 Joined: Jul 26, 2015 18:28	by Ashi » Nov 25, 2015 02:36 Thank you for working hard on our favorite game and server! I used to come here every day, but not so frequent over the past 10 months. I'm glad I checked in to see this. I have been wondering since the revamp started if the staff might consider a specific style change that always seemed to be flawed since the very start of Daoc. The Duel Wield line for infiltrators. Some of the styles cannot be implemented due to the class not being able to parry. This flaw was rectified later on to make them evade styles for those that evade, and parry styles for those who parry. I understand your going for 1.65, I just thought this might be a valid argument under the circumstances. If nothing more than to at least discuss it amongst yourselves. Thanks for hearing it either way.

Nezix Phoenix Knight Posts: 1138 Joined: Oct 27, 2012 08:41	by Nezix » Nov 25, 2015 04:21 Ashi wrote:Thank you for working hard on our favorite game and server! I used to come here every day, but not so frequent over the past 10 months. I'm glad I checked in to see this. I have been wondering since the revamp started if the staff might consider a specific style change that always seemed to be flawed since the very start of Daoc. The Duel Wield line for infiltrators. Some of the styles cannot be implemented due to the class not being able to parry. This flaw was rectified later on to make them evade styles for those that evade, and parry styles for those who parry. I understand your going for 1.65, I just thought this might be a valid argument under the circumstances. If nothing more than to at least discuss it amongst yourselves. Thanks for hearing it either way. From a grab bag on 9-20-2002: Q: I am a tank who trained up in piercing styles. Some piercing styles require evade as an opener, which I do not have as a pure tank. Is this an error? A: No, it's not. We've gone through and cleaned out the errors in the style lines, so any of the remaining "opening move" style listings are intentional. The piercing lines are rogue oriented. Basically, if yourre a pure tank you need to decide if you want the versatility of having several weapon skills (very useful given the resists we put in a few weeks back) or the concentrated "oomph" of focusing on a more traditional warrior's weapon. Being able to use a large weapon, then switch to a bleeder style, etc, sounds a little overpowered. I know it's confusing to have styles you can't use show up on your list mingles with things you CAN use, and it is a known issue. Of course they did eventually change a lot of these. The reflection style change in Duel Wield came in 2007, 4 years after 1.65. Maybe the changes between 1.65 and 1.91 in the game made more sense for that style to change as well. Sort of irrelevant because as an infiltrator you should spec 50 Thrust because Dragonfang is so good. Nezix - 50 Minstrel <The Band> Merlin: Arthur, what is best in life? Arthur: To crush your enemies, to see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentations of their Lurikeens.

mlitens Guardian Posts: 1 Joined: Nov 09, 2012 18:42 Location: Helsinki, Finland	by mlitens » Nov 25, 2015 10:14 Wonderful news And as said, already signed up for the testers group .. no matter if it would be boring or not .. the more people gives helping hands the faster things will be done and getting closer to stress test and open beta Cheers folks !! ML

shade Eagle Knight Posts: 690 Joined: Apr 01, 2009 00:00	by shade » Nov 25, 2015 10:53 Ashi wrote:Thank you for working hard on our favorite game and server! I used to come here every day, but not so frequent over the past 10 months. I'm glad I checked in to see this. I have been wondering since the revamp started if the staff might consider a specific style change that always seemed to be flawed since the very start of Daoc. The Duel Wield line for infiltrators. Some of the styles cannot be implemented due to the class not being able to parry. This flaw was rectified later on to make them evade styles for those that evade, and parry styles for those who parry. I understand your going for 1.65, I just thought this might be a valid argument under the circumstances. If nothing more than to at least discuss it amongst yourselves. Thanks for hearing it either way. Do you also want the 1.69 stun nerf of dragonfang? Because Infiltrators are not supposed to have a 9s stun It's all about the package. Staff decision was that 1.65 is the "sweet spot" for overall "packages". “DAOC is not about what you can log. It's about what you can play :> ” Uthgard 1.0: <Die Lettanten> Ivia - 8L8 Nightshade - Lone Enforcer since 8L1. Uthgard 2.0: <Illuminated Stormriders> Oxy - Hero; Ivia - Nightshade.