Uthgard • View topic - Patch goal 1.69 and Old Realm Abilities

Patch goal 1.69 and Old Realm Abilities

187 posts • Page 2 of 13 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 13

onlinev Guardian Posts: 4 Joined: Oct 26, 2013 21:45	by onlinev » Oct 31, 2013 06:25 As a new player, uthgard staff behavior is terrible. I can understand the server goal and what the staff wish for. BUT How come can staff decided to remove taj without any notice, no rp upon death etc which are huge disadvantages for new comers. Yes former players already have everything in hand and enjoyed don't-worry-about-death-rp system so they don't need to QQing, but for the new comers this is just terrible. And I know I am not the only one saying recent patches are BAD. Don't listen to players and let's see how this server would be.

_Oglop_ Phoenix Knight Posts: 1414 Joined: Dec 10, 2010 05:24	by _Oglop_ » Oct 31, 2013 06:34 Such wonderful news and already people have derailed it with their whining. "It's not fair unless I'm winning!"

Foneb Eagle Knight Posts: 640 Joined: Jan 15, 2010 01:00	by Foneb » Oct 31, 2013 07:34 svperstar wrote: Austerim wrote:Glad a lot of my chars will be made worthless with Old RAs! I can't wait to see how someone like Zachnafien/Zachnamid likes Ranger/Hunter with See Hidden and no MOS hahahaha as a ranger i fully support this change not because it benefits me but because its something that needs to be done Hiois - Ranger 9lX Uth 1.0 Hiois - Enchanter 6lx Uth 2.0 Mugad - Warden 4lx Uth 2.0 Esigil - Druid 3lx Uth 2.0 Hioisx - Nightshade 1lx Uth 2.0

Herm666 Eagle Knight Posts: 571 Joined: Jan 31, 2008 01:00	by Herm666 » Oct 31, 2013 07:40 Did Mark Jacobs send you an USB stick with leaked Old RAs? aylwynn warden

Force Phoenix Knight Posts: 1569 Joined: Oct 22, 2009 00:00	by Force » Oct 31, 2013 08:14 This is awesome news. Any decision on keeping current RR cap or going back to 1.69 cap for Old RAs?

Icharus Myrmidon Posts: 212 Joined: Oct 18, 2009 00:00	by Icharus » Oct 31, 2013 08:15 svperstar wrote:I owe someone some money. He said as Origins got closer you would announce Old RAs and he was right on the money. Holy crap. I quit playing Uthgard awhile ago and am helping Best test Origins. It's no surprise to me the Uthgard staff are taking pre-emptive steps to try and retain their player base... but it's too little too late by 2 years and about 8+ nerfs/unique customizations that have no place in a classic server. Besides.. the attitude of the Admins/GMs drove me away just as much as the inherent problems with the server and player base. Changing the RA's won't fix what is ultimately wrong with your server.

Plok Gryphon Knight Posts: 354 Joined: Jan 22, 2013 17:55 Location: Denmark	by Plok » Oct 31, 2013 08:25 WOOT?! Any eta on old ra's? It seems good that you are focusing on implementing old ra's, but it would be nice with a timeline or just a estimate? The only thing that i think uthgard lack off atm is some project management, in some sort. It seems that a lot of people from the playerbase are ****** duo to the recent changes?

Affri Warder Posts: 9 Joined: Nov 01, 2011 13:17	by Affri » Oct 31, 2013 09:19 dealinjah wrote:yes ranger can delete imo ^^ and svpstar remember no more viper for infis ^^ Guess u didnt played daoc back then. Rangers and Hunters will get realy superior ra's like Mastery of the arcane and avoid pain. The only archer class u never ever will see are scouts. Rangers and Hunters will be suffer mos stealth detect aye but MoA5 and ap3 will make em even more op. I know what im talking about, played 8 years a scout, 5 of em with old ras. Uthgard 1.0: Cermit 6L5 Ranger Uthgard 2.0: Kenni 4Lx Infiltrator Genesis: Quambo 11L4 Nightshade

Drusillaz Myrmidon Posts: 94 Joined: Nov 22, 2010 12:27	by Drusillaz » Oct 31, 2013 10:24 Adianne wrote:To the Staff, Thank you for this message and update. THIS kind of communication is what most of your player base is looking for... It was very considerate of you to inform us of what to expect and what to look forward to. Keep up this kind of communication? Yes I totally agree: we can avoid a lot of second guessing and bad rumors when staff communicates to the players, so Thank you for that!!! /Druheals

mcnasty Warder Posts: 33 Joined: Nov 08, 2009 01:00	by mcnasty » Oct 31, 2013 10:52 cool now take out buffpots pls k thx

vangonaj Alerion Knight Posts: 2497 Joined: Sep 14, 2007 00:00 Location: Galpen	by vangonaj » Oct 31, 2013 10:57 mcnasty wrote:cool now take out buffpots pls k thx You will still suck XDDDDD Abydos wrote: Uthgard will still host own events and offer some custom created content but we will make sure it doesn't interfere with original DAoC as much as e.g. Tajendi items did. Could you explain please how taj items interfere with original daoc? As i know no one hits harder, faster... only makes easy template build. With last changes you only will reduce rvr population. And the staff should remember that this is year 2013 and not 2002 when most of players had 18 years old and had hours and hours for play and farm items. Now most of players have job, family... and dont have 5 hours for play every day. Maybe 90% players here are casual, only log 1-2 hours, do some runs in Emain or any bg and logs. Make uthgard easy for newcomers and casual players, not all players are freaks without real life. And about old ras and SI. Could you give us any date or month or year?

Inside Myrmidon Posts: 105 Joined: Mar 24, 2009 01:00	by Inside » Oct 31, 2013 11:27 Runis wrote:Uthgard staff needs to understand that the playerbase is annoyed by the constant nerfs. Removing barrels, removing recharges, nerfing charged items (and having to farm them again), nerfing horses, removing tajendi etc. Constant nerfs makes you feel that you have no progress and you just waste your time. People have worked for their items / their mounts / their templates. You dont even wanna give a free respec when you do important changes - not that i need any cause i can afford, but the lowbies might need (see serenity). Players feel like they are playing a beta here, all this reminds me why i quit playing 3 years ago. Where is the problem if people have plat and templates and they are ready to rvr? There is no need for constant farming and constant re-templating chars. I totaly agree with this ... You made GamePlay really hard for ppl who spend a lot of time here in this server, constant change..., constant backup ... And Tajendi 2, a long LONG WORK, for be removed ???????... So what in few time time uthalis removed also i guess ... Atm players dont make investisement on this server, but just leave, or go away, because this one is totaly unstable ... And old player here are not rewarded.

shintari Gryphon Knight Posts: 491 Joined: Feb 17, 2010 01:00	by shintari » Oct 31, 2013 11:45 great news!

Oswaldo Phoenix Knight Posts: 1503 Joined: Apr 10, 2011 22:53	by Oswaldo » Oct 31, 2013 11:56 Runis QQ more and stealth zerg and add ****** more, no one cares about your opinion.. Tbh all these whiners, leave instead of crying like little girls here every god damn time the staff tells you something new.. THis is very good news, I started to play here, 4-5(?) years ago, because i wanted to play with old ra's again. Through my years here it has been obvious that sometimes people leave Uthgard and they cry out "SERVER IS GONNA DIEEEE!!!" Maybe sometimes the population drops a little bit here, but that doesnt change the fact it always pops back to around the 1k people and uthgard has been here, for what, like 10 years or something? In short terms, deal with it - Honey Badgers - Winkz

Celteen Alerion Knight Posts: 2326 Joined: Dec 20, 2010 16:52	by Celteen » Oct 31, 2013 12:33 When they have working Old RA's + SI I see 1k players, not 100 ^^ Having some whiners leaving who cares, they would have left anyway and now is just nice timing to do so, including char deleting, forum posts and all this drama. I like the recent changes There are not many "annoying" bugfixes to come anyway. Biggest one is heals but that will effect everyone. <<< This avatar is handmade by Inotor Wurzelbert : ) Check out the Mampfer-Threads for more. viewtopic.php?f=10&t=25079 viewtopic.php?f=10&t=26934