Is three Grab Bags a crowd?

Here you can comment on news articles.
User avatar
Feuille
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 448
Joined: Dec 01, 2009 01:00

Postby Feuille » Jun 09, 2015 13:30

There were BBs on live it's a fact. There weren't a tons because it cost irl money and in the past you had to have a good config to play correctly with 2 accounts on the same computer.

We play on 2015, on a freeshard.What does it means? Everyone can run 2+ accounts on its computer because it's free and easy. It'll give you advantages.

And that's why staff don't want. Bots split more the player between experienced player (very experienced multi-boxer) and lowbie.

User avatar
Baman
Myrmidon
 
Posts: 103
Joined: Feb 26, 2010 01:00

Postby Baman » Jun 09, 2015 15:04

Bcopeland wrote:Also you are instantly more desirable in a group if you come with your own buffs.


Not really.
Image

User avatar
Infinitum
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 236
Joined: Jan 11, 2013 01:36

Postby Infinitum » Jun 09, 2015 17:22

Let me explain conclusively why buff bots will not be seen on Uthgard ever. Some people have mentioned previously but hopefully these points will drive it home for you:

1. Buff bots were never intended for the game upon its original release. It wasn't until players realised (specifically stealthers) that 'hey if I buy two accounts, level a buffer on one and just play my other then I can run fully buffed WIN!!!'. Mythic at the time then came to realise that whilst buff bots were not 'healthy' for the game (especially solo play) it effectively doubled there income amongst certain players. To put this in perspective:

An average European subscription = 8.99. The average population on servers was 1700 (lets say) that is £15,283 per server. Now, lets say that 40% of the player base had buff bots that brings an added revenue of £6,113 - now were they ever going to deny themselves of this? Hell no! Some players on Mid ran three acounts... Healer and Shaman = even more income.

2. Uthgard is a free non profit service, there is zero incentive from the staff members to gain income from their player base. Thus, they have the opportunity to create a server in which advantages amongst players is not a given (dual logging) but instead is earned through time spent farming items. This is a MMORPG, things have to be earned through time thus the argument of 'well he/she plays more than I do so I should get buff bots' is completely and utterly banal.

3. We have to consider also that whilst Blue, Nayru and the rest of the coding team have done a fantastic job in allowing a high population to hit the server - why on earth would they want to ruin an equal opportunity for a large number of people to play when everyone is running two/three/four accounts (lets not forget that people will naturally go Team Wizzy style)? Thus flooding the server. One thing we always strive for in Dark Age of Camelot is a large community of players not a bunch of empty soles standing there just to buff. Community is everything in DAOC.

4. 'But Infinitum I'm talking about a buff merchant' - Well you obviously didn't read my first few points. Players need to earn there buffs through grouping that necessary classes in there groups or farming the specific items. I can 100% assure you that farming D/Q and S/C items especially when SI comes is not difficult at all.
The Lone Assassin
Image
Image

Formerly: Infinitum - Uthgard 1

Infinitum Style: https://youtu.be/Xae13-nWnBw

ACrispyTaco
Myrmidon
 
Posts: 84
Joined: Mar 11, 2015 05:53
Location: Steam: Cabalistlbb

Postby ACrispyTaco » Jun 09, 2015 17:48

Infinitum wrote:Community is everything in DAOC.


10/10

Buff bots suck. But so do elitists who kick people from groups because the race, class or spec they picked. No one will play on a server where the upper 1% treat the lower 99% like ****** just because they don't agree or like what you are playing.

Panini
Myrmidon
 
Posts: 63
Joined: Sep 24, 2011 12:35

Postby Panini » Jun 09, 2015 18:12

a buff NPC i could agree to to some extent (certain zones, certain potency , ...)

buffbots though certainly not, in any zone or any form.
And the main reason would be how heavy it weighs on a freeshard server. And since its a freeshard server, every single player would have them.

I foresee the server heaving trouble with just the players once it goes live, image doubling that number.

Another point is the social aspect as stated by several other people. This game thought me to look for groups and play with strangers. Its a big part of the game that gets taken away otherwise.
Next to that i also enjoy just bashing away for hours on some mobs solo. I gues i'm lucky that way ;)
Midgard Panini 3L5 RM, Species 5L0 SVG | Jaecar 2L2 Hunter | Sploon 40 Sb
Hibernia <Wilson> Seiceps 2L7 Druid - RIP
Hibernia <Na Fianna Dragun> Diesl - 30 Valewalker | Jabstar - 46 Nightshade | Strickland - 43 Enchanter

American beer is like making love in a canoe; It's f*cking close to water. - Monty Python

User avatar
Foneb
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 640
Joined: Jan 15, 2010 01:00

Postby Foneb » Jun 09, 2015 18:59

I would argue though that at release patchlevdl you would be completly right, at 1.65 they changed certan mechanics allready to balance the game around the existend buffbots. By denying them you change a major part of the balance. And since this is custom anyway a custom solution like a npc or a linked second account would be reasonable
Hiois - Ranger 9lX Uth 1.0
Hiois - Enchanter 6lx Uth 2.0
Mugad - Warden 4lx Uth 2.0
Esigil - Druid 3lx Uth 2.0
Hioisx - Nightshade 1lx Uth 2.0

bloodylittle
Warder
 
Posts: 9
Joined: Feb 25, 2014 20:50

Postby bloodylittle » Jun 09, 2015 20:23

Two accounts to me is ok. It's nice to be able to level with a bot. More than two, I agree would be bad.

User avatar
Infinitum
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 236
Joined: Jan 11, 2013 01:36

Postby Infinitum » Jun 09, 2015 20:42

bloodylittle wrote:Two accounts to me is ok. It's nice to be able to level with a bot. More than two, I agree would be bad.


You quite clearly did not read my post explaining clearly the reason why this is silly.
The Lone Assassin
Image
Image

Formerly: Infinitum - Uthgard 1

Infinitum Style: https://youtu.be/Xae13-nWnBw

User avatar
Galandriel2
Phoenix Knight
 
Posts: 1662
Joined: Nov 26, 2010 18:08

Postby Galandriel2 » Jun 09, 2015 20:52

Two accounts to me is ok. It's nice to be able to level with a bot. More than two, I agree would be bad.
Image
Image
Image
[12:46] <Roundhouse_> actualy galandriel and blackbeard the master challenges out on heavytanks
[23:52] <Skarz> u are best skald i seen for long time

User avatar
Juri
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 766
Joined: Mar 10, 2011 03:18

Postby Juri » Jun 09, 2015 21:22

Infinitum wrote:
bloodylittle wrote:Two accounts to me is ok. It's nice to be able to level with a bot. More than two, I agree would be bad.


You quite clearly did not read my post explaining clearly the reason why this is silly.


I mean, at a certain point you just get so tired to answer to troll unwilling to listen that you should just let them pour in their own sh1t and move on.

User avatar
Baman
Myrmidon
 
Posts: 103
Joined: Feb 26, 2010 01:00

Postby Baman » Jun 09, 2015 21:50

Someone should keep a tally of how many times we go through these cycles of the exact same arguments we've had for months.

Next on the rotation should be "please remove buff charges". After that, my money's on no RPs for grays.
Image

User avatar
Foneb
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 640
Joined: Jan 15, 2010 01:00

Postby Foneb » Jun 09, 2015 23:15

True that baman. But what else is there to do? Shall we warm up the poisoned weapons should be tradeble argument? The reasoning is rughly the same so we could recycle the last few posts
Hiois - Ranger 9lX Uth 1.0
Hiois - Enchanter 6lx Uth 2.0
Mugad - Warden 4lx Uth 2.0
Esigil - Druid 3lx Uth 2.0
Hioisx - Nightshade 1lx Uth 2.0

Bcopeland
Warder
 
Posts: 33
Joined: Jun 08, 2015 15:55

Postby Bcopeland » Jun 09, 2015 23:17

I have read your previous posts, and a buffing NPC won't change group dynamics in pve. I'm not saying we need bots. Again a buffing NPC changes very little other than relieve frustration with leveling up. Of course you can create groups, and most will do this. A buffing NPC has no weight on this. There is s reason this keeps coming up, and the majority agree we don't need or want boyt. Some say they still want bots. A buffing NPC only helps everyone...

kildich
Warder
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Apr 13, 2013 02:21

Postby kildich » Jun 10, 2015 00:19

I am very well aware that the devs won't allow bots and I played on the server without them. I respect their decision because what choice do I have, however I don't like people that agree with them gloating over their victory. The devs have their reasons for not allowing it and maybe it is the same as yours and maybe is isn't. The devs are the only ones that get to dictate how the game is run and played and those jackoffs that are insulting those of us who have a difference of opinion can STFU. You play the way you want to and the devs are supporting your play style, that's great. No one is trying to tell you how to play, we are just asking for the same consideration and again no one has presented an argument that I think is worth a DAMN why allowing 1 bot in PVE only zones harms anyone. If anything not allowing bots makes it so that if players want to level at anything other than a snails pace they have to play like the assholes who have been gloating about getting their way. Well sorry, but the people being jerks have given me more of a reason not to group with people on this server PERIOD, I will use up server resources and I WILL NOT play to help anyone else but myself. I call on any decent person to give a big FU to the anti-botters/forced gameplay style by joining me in soloing. Again no one told the anti-botters how to play, I would never try to force someone to use a bot but I think its disgraceful and disgusting how the elitists on these forums act all high and mighty and try to force people to play how they do.

Panini
Myrmidon
 
Posts: 63
Joined: Sep 24, 2011 12:35

Postby Panini » Jun 10, 2015 00:27

Or we just stop discussing this moot point.
Midgard Panini 3L5 RM, Species 5L0 SVG | Jaecar 2L2 Hunter | Sploon 40 Sb
Hibernia <Wilson> Seiceps 2L7 Druid - RIP
Hibernia <Na Fianna Dragun> Diesl - 30 Valewalker | Jabstar - 46 Nightshade | Strickland - 43 Enchanter

American beer is like making love in a canoe; It's f*cking close to water. - Monty Python

PreviousNext

Return to News

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 45 guests

Sunday, 22. June 2025

Artwork and screen shots Copyright © 2001-2004 Mythic Entertainment, Inc. All rights reserved. Used with permission of Mythic Entertainment. Mythic Entertainment, the Mythic Entertainment logo, "Dark Age of Camelot," "Shrouded Isles," "Foundations," "New Frontiers," "Trials of Atlantis," "Catacombs," "Darkness Rising," the Dark Age of Camelot and subsequent logos, and the stylized Celtic knot are trademarks of Mythic Entertainment, Inc.

Valid XHTML & CSS | Original Design by: LernVid.com | Modified by Uthgard Staff