BG community poll: Braemar

Talk about your RvR experience here

Choose your future battleground lvl1-35

Poll ended at Apr 21, 2008 20:48

Braemar
76
55%
Killaloe
53
39%
Hills of Claret
8
6%
 
Total votes : 137

User avatar
Haldan
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 921
Joined: Feb 29, 2008 01:00

Postby Haldan » Apr 14, 2008 20:48

Please decide which zone shall be the new Braemar zone map:

1) Braemar

We love it as it is!

Image


2) Killaloe

Gorges leading to the central keep placed on top of a overlooking hill.

Image


3) Hills of Claret

A lake plateau with surrounding forests.

Image

User avatar
Pinky
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 237
Joined: May 16, 2006 00:00
Location: Germany

Postby Pinky » Apr 14, 2008 22:08

I Write down my post for all 3 topics in this one^^:

1. Braemar, nice as it is, everyone loves it
2. Thidranki is much better
3. Leirvik cause of the Towers, practice for lvl 50 RvR
MfG Silfa
[img]http://herald.uthgard.net/daoc/sig.php?name=Muriel&s=-1[/img]
Ente Ente Ente Ente Ente Ente Ente Ente Ente Ente Ente
-Ralph Wiggum-

nextor
Warder
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Feb 23, 2007 01:00

Postby nextor » Apr 15, 2008 07:50

i love braemar as it is, but i also like changes, so -> vote for Killaloe

User avatar
Elwin
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 557
Joined: Jun 11, 2006 00:00
Location: Poland

Postby Elwin » Apr 15, 2008 11:47

is good as it is
<img src="http://217.86.191.120:81/sig.php?chars=Shien;Sumuran;Silen;Silia;Sinius;Silenius">

User avatar
speebo
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 480
Joined: May 29, 2007 00:00
Location: Germany

Postby speebo » Apr 15, 2008 15:46

the smaller, the better.... vote for claret!
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

User avatar
Jojoner
Warder
 
Posts: 37
Joined: Mar 07, 2008 01:00

Postby Jojoner » Oct 26, 2008 23:53

vote for 3.) claret.
everythings better than brae ^^
greetz

User avatar
Supafly
Myrmidon
 
Posts: 129
Joined: Nov 10, 2008 01:00

Postby Supafly » Nov 10, 2008 14:48

Vote for 1!! Braemar is awesome the way it is.. any change made to braemar would be for the worst :S

but then again that's only my opinion! :wink:

User avatar
Gemma
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 700
Joined: Oct 20, 2008 00:00
Location: Midgard

Postby Gemma » Nov 10, 2008 16:19

I´d like to vote, but it seems that i cannot.

If i could vote, i would vote for Braemar, cause its working, and the time to change the BG would be better used for implementing other maps, map-parts or quests!!!!!

User avatar
Nayru
Developer
Developer
 
Posts: 8834
Joined: Jan 08, 2007 01:00

Postby Nayru » Nov 10, 2008 17:49

The poll has shown us that the majority wishes to keep Braemar. But anyways we're going to implement another battleground before Braemar. We're not completely finished with planning yet, but as it seems it will be the Killaloe for levels 1-19.

User avatar
Gemma
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 700
Joined: Oct 20, 2008 00:00
Location: Midgard

Postby Gemma » Nov 10, 2008 17:57

yeah, great! now that im lvl 23 ther will be a BG for lowlier Chars. *grmblfzt*

Amisch
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 336
Joined: Jun 12, 2007 00:00

Postby Amisch » Nov 10, 2008 18:20

cool. Sounds nice :)

User avatar
Stinka
Warder
 
Posts: 18
Joined: Aug 08, 2007 00:00

Postby Stinka » Nov 10, 2008 18:21

I think it would be better if there were less BGs, so that more people want to reach Lvl. 50 and do Big RvR there.
But the more BGs are there the less people will come to Agramon.

Of corse BGs are fun and great to exp, too, but it makes no sence to split the few people who are active on this server into more different RvR zones/BGs.

And even when the 50s don't swith to their twinks to go RvR with a lvl 19 char there would be the problem, that other level 19s cant do RvR when no one is there...

So -in my opinion- the best thing would be to make less RvR zones, like putting Wilton and Thidranki together.

Well, if there are enough active players it would be an awesome idea to make such BGs.

And atm I think it's good when low-levelers come to Braemar to gain xp fast, because the faster they reach level 50 the more people will be in Agramon.

User avatar
Gemma
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 700
Joined: Oct 20, 2008 00:00
Location: Midgard

Postby Gemma » Nov 10, 2008 18:30

i get ure point, but i think that there should definitely be a low-lvl BG for training RVR and getting a few RPs on lower lvls.

Now it is so, that u have to group with at least two lvl 30+ Chars to gain something from beeing in BG, but wouldnt it be nicer if u could even do this with a group of 3-5 lvl around 10?

But for the argument, that u lose ppl in agra, i can say for me, that i want to lvl my warrior up to 50 and play him further then, not making me another char to fight in lower BGs.

Now u dont have a chance with a samll group of even lvl 20-25 chars, especially with those lvl 30+ stealther-guys that are often to find in Braemar.

User avatar
Supafly
Myrmidon
 
Posts: 129
Joined: Nov 10, 2008 01:00

Postby Supafly » Nov 11, 2008 09:43

I think that is an awesome idea nayru, keep brae as it is and implement a new BG for lvls 1-19. That way ppl can stop complaining about grey kills and leechers and it will be more balanced.

Nicely done! :)

Amisch
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 336
Joined: Jun 12, 2007 00:00

Postby Amisch » Nov 11, 2008 16:35

do you got any Ideas for an RR Cap yet ? Maybe you can boost the RvR Exp in that low lvl bg a bit, so most players come in taste of RvR, train theyre rvr skills and faster reach lvl 20. After that BG keep it as it is curently.

Next

Return to Realm versus Realm

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests

cron

Wednesday, 03. September 2025

Artwork and screen shots Copyright © 2001-2004 Mythic Entertainment, Inc. All rights reserved. Used with permission of Mythic Entertainment. Mythic Entertainment, the Mythic Entertainment logo, "Dark Age of Camelot," "Shrouded Isles," "Foundations," "New Frontiers," "Trials of Atlantis," "Catacombs," "Darkness Rising," the Dark Age of Camelot and subsequent logos, and the stylized Celtic knot are trademarks of Mythic Entertainment, Inc.

Valid XHTML & CSS | Original Design by: LernVid.com | Modified by Uthgard Staff