Wierd rule?

Talk about your RvR experience here
Zarkor
Unicorn Knight
 
Posts: 3710
Joined: Aug 15, 2006 00:00
Location: Antwerp, Flanders, Belgium

Postby Zarkor » Apr 01, 2010 02:22

Ezek wrote:§2.5. You may not cooperate with your realm's enemies. This also means it is not allowed to sit together and have a coffee party. The only exception for that is an event with a peace zone.


This basicly means you can't let people live anymore? Imagine I pass Weia for instance and just do /wave, I'm violating that rule? Or is it from the moment we run in the same direction without harming eachother...?

User avatar
Bizaflare
Myrmidon
 
Posts: 114
Joined: Apr 17, 2009 00:00

Postby Bizaflare » Apr 01, 2010 02:37

hahahaha
greys shall be ganked by rule.
solos shall be zerged by rule.

this rule is new, or is it old and no one noticed yet?
<img src="http://herald.uthgard-server.net/daoc/sig.php?name=Bix&s=7">

Nayru wrote:But yes, it seems as if old realmbilities are better for our setting.


:)

User avatar
Neju
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 893
Joined: Sep 11, 2009 00:00

Postby Neju » Apr 01, 2010 02:39

think it's new, some guys got banned for sitting in odins and not just ganking each other 2 weeks ago anyways :lol:
I two-shot Zerkers

Zarkor
Unicorn Knight
 
Posts: 3710
Joined: Aug 15, 2006 00:00
Location: Antwerp, Flanders, Belgium

Postby Zarkor » Apr 01, 2010 02:48

Bizaflare wrote:greys shall be ganked by rule.
solos shall be zerged by rule.


It kinda looks like it does indeed come down to this. :?

User avatar
Ironberg
Myrmidon
 
Posts: 153
Joined: Feb 01, 2008 01:00

Postby Ironberg » Apr 01, 2010 04:05

I decide what to kill in this game, no rule should tell me otherwise

User avatar
blackitalian
Warder
 
Posts: 48
Joined: Jan 19, 2010 01:00

Postby blackitalian » Apr 01, 2010 04:33

red is dead... every one dies, it's rvr not pvp and greys should stay in safe zone if they don't want to be ganked. that's the rule and i will follow it to the end. :D

User avatar
Seyha
Phoenix Knight
 
Posts: 1726
Joined: Apr 25, 2009 00:00
Location: Schadenfreude City, USA

Postby Seyha » Apr 01, 2010 07:04

blackitalian wrote:red is dead... every one dies, it's rvr not pvp and greys should stay in safe zone if they don't want to be ganked. that's the rule and i will follow it to the end. :D


But that should be a personal choice, within reason.

I've been cross-realmed before. And when I say cross-realm I mean the Alb and the Hib /cheered and /danced after they teamed up on me. It sucked. But that is an extreme case.

If people choose not to attack then that is their choice. I don't like to kill grays because it's lame, but also because it resets the timer on my camouflage and leaves me vulnerable to attack from real enemies. It's a tactical choice.

GMs should not dictate player tactics. Especially not with bans.
Luzifa: freak
Luzifa: delete your freak
Luzifa: seyha why you always coward?
Luzifa: running valkyn freak

Ceadius
Myrmidon
 
Posts: 68
Joined: Jan 26, 2010 01:00
Location: Sparks, Nv USA

Postby Ceadius » Apr 01, 2010 07:44

Ya, I've rarely ever killed greys (only 1 outside of them attacking me/group) or pve'ers (green+) outside DF when I can't find people to fight me and they own it lol. But like Seyha said, it's lame. So if I get banned for choosing who to fight when they will not attack me either then I guess I get banned for playing how I want without any harm to anything in game/anyone.

User avatar
Hobbes
Myrmidon
 
Posts: 112
Joined: Nov 28, 2009 01:00

Postby Hobbes » Apr 01, 2010 08:37

My personal question to those honored palyers is: why would you let run any enemy, if you can have clean 1v1 on him? The rule doesnt say you need to add on anything, but fight it initially without stupid duel rules. After all, not every class is made for to /bow each fight and not having the initiative strike(s) if it wants a proper chance to win. If you dont want to fight a specific enemy, what is your idea of playing DAoC at all? This is no RPG server, but no second life as well: do what you are expect to do regarding PvP. As easy as it gets.

Rule just says dont establish some stupid duel events, that create an atmosphere of a non attack agreement forced on any participate. And if you didnt follow, you were the moron to ALL realms (two of them effectively combine forces against you if you break that duel rules, whilst the realm mates offer no help or support).

Glacius
 

Postby Glacius » Apr 01, 2010 10:06

Zarkor wrote:
Ezek wrote:§2.5. You may not cooperate with your realm's enemies. This also means it is not allowed to sit together and have a coffee party. The only exception for that is an event with a peace zone.


This basicly means you can't let people live anymore? Imagine I pass Weia for instance and just do /wave, I'm violating that rule? Or is it from the moment we run in the same direction without harming eachother...?


I made a thread about it also but got locked : http://uthgard-server.net/modules.php?n ... ic&t=17097

Those ppl fought in emain btw..indeed the choice should be ours .

blackitalian wrote:red is dead... every one dies, it's rvr not pvp and greys should stay in safe zone if they don't want to be ganked. that's the rule and i will follow it to the end. :D


This "red is dead" policy of yours shows what character you have , some ppl respect one to another on this server and will not add and will not gank another player ,even if beeing an enemy... if they respect him...i hope u dont play mid:P.
Last edited by Glacius on Apr 01, 2010 13:00, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
elTakapiru
Myrmidon
 
Posts: 122
Joined: Feb 12, 2007 01:00

Postby elTakapiru » Apr 01, 2010 11:18

hmm this means, that 3 realm fights are no longer permitted, since u are cooperating with 1 realm in any case. So if u see 2 realm fighting together turn blind eye while they fight and go fight the winner after that.

ps. and u still can have tea partys

User avatar
zaszeadora
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 321
Joined: Sep 03, 2009 00:00

Postby zaszeadora » Apr 01, 2010 11:33

Well so many crazy ideas i see here, this a rule on server and DAOC

RED=DEAD

its easy ^^

User avatar
Artefact
Phoenix Knight
 
Posts: 1393
Joined: Oct 24, 2007 00:00
Location: France - Rennes

Postby Artefact » Apr 01, 2010 11:44

This rule is old .... :)
Image

Wally
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 909
Joined: May 28, 2008 00:00

Postby Wally » Apr 01, 2010 12:13

The people got unbanned by the GM. The GM missunderstood the situation and acted too fast. There is no rule that forces you to attack people of the other realm.

Though, if we experience rp farming we will punish this with a ban and depending on the case with rp decrease.

Zarkor
Unicorn Knight
 
Posts: 3710
Joined: Aug 15, 2006 00:00
Location: Antwerp, Flanders, Belgium

Postby Zarkor » Apr 01, 2010 12:26

Wally wrote:The people got unbanned by the GM. The GM missunderstood the situation and acted too fast. There is no rule that forces you to attack people of the other realm.

Though, if we experience rp farming we will punish this with a ban and depending on the case with rp decrease.


Thx for the clarification.

Next

Return to Realm versus Realm

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 49 guests

cron

Sunday, 31. August 2025

Artwork and screen shots Copyright © 2001-2004 Mythic Entertainment, Inc. All rights reserved. Used with permission of Mythic Entertainment. Mythic Entertainment, the Mythic Entertainment logo, "Dark Age of Camelot," "Shrouded Isles," "Foundations," "New Frontiers," "Trials of Atlantis," "Catacombs," "Darkness Rising," the Dark Age of Camelot and subsequent logos, and the stylized Celtic knot are trademarks of Mythic Entertainment, Inc.

Valid XHTML & CSS | Original Design by: LernVid.com | Modified by Uthgard Staff