Wtb custom fix

Talk about your RvR experience here
User avatar
pythion
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 647
Joined: Jun 21, 2010 00:00

Postby pythion » Jun 19, 2013 14:23

pythion wrote:WTB real fix.
song animations shouldnt show during bard rr5.


It's punishment enough to use Catacombs models
At least let them have the ability of finding bards in RR5
Image
__________________RvR Videos - Pyth UI_____________________

User avatar
Abydos
Game Master
Game Master
 
Posts: 6839
Joined: Jan 22, 2011 21:14

Postby Abydos » Jun 19, 2013 16:23

Celteen wrote:Did they revamp the bard rr5 with the new Dragonslayer items or was it like that since New RA's?
On live undyed Dragonslayer armor is as obvious as here.
If you run ToA RA's with classic items / stats / abilities it causes problems everywere :idea:


Yes, they revamped it with dragonslayer

User avatar
pythion
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 647
Joined: Jun 21, 2010 00:00

Postby pythion » Aug 09, 2013 14:05

my bard rr5ed on live with a few minutes of editing pskins.csv or monsters.csv and voila

ImageImageImageImageImage
Image
__________________RvR Videos - Pyth UI_____________________

User avatar
Lucifire
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 390
Joined: Dec 10, 2010 04:47

Postby Lucifire » Aug 09, 2013 19:34

Lets give ranger a better rr5 - one that stuns, does damage, and is unpurgeable!

... Oh wait
Image
Image

User avatar
Austerim
Alerion Knight
 
Posts: 2743
Joined: Dec 15, 2010 16:27

Postby Austerim » Aug 09, 2013 19:40

Lucifire wrote:Lets give ranger a better rr5 - one that stuns, does damage, and is unpurgeable!

... Oh wait
This is a Bard RR5 topic, not another one of your Ranger QQ threads.
[3:10pm] <myrmidon^> You have to be a c*** to be awesome at daoc
[3:10pm] <myrmidon^> that's what I learnt
[3:11pm] <Frosty_> then why does austerim suck
lordgriffon wrote:Oh by the way... ever seen a group of 8 smite clerics? Or play against a group like that? I have. Absolute devastation. The group that runs up against them can't kill them fast enough because smite clerics have sooooooo many tools at their disposal combined with decent ranged damage with 8 of them dudes doing it!

User avatar
Orihiime
Phoenix Knight
 
Posts: 1740
Joined: Dec 15, 2010 11:40

Postby Orihiime » Aug 09, 2013 19:54

Austerim wrote:
Lucifire wrote:Lets give ranger a better rr5 - one that stuns, does damage, and is unpurgeable!

... Oh wait
This is a Bard RR5 topic, not another one of your Ranger QQ threads.

+, that guy still on his ranger QQ hahaha thats pathetic
2012:<@[Uth]Abydos> If we don't have SI by the end of the year, Im fairly certain I wont be a GM anymore :-p

User avatar
_Oglop_
Phoenix Knight
 
Posts: 1414
Joined: Dec 10, 2010 05:24

Postby _Oglop_ » Aug 09, 2013 20:01

pythion wrote:my bard rr5ed on live with a few minutes of editing pskins.csv or monsters.csv and voila

[buncha really awesome images]


Suggestion: Change all the shiny Naduratha RF to the Crystalized Heavy Cailiocht RF you actually see 50's use here.
Image

Asuming you're not done, I do not see all of the possible gender/class combinations ~ (Male Sylvan VW, Female Celt BM etc)
Image
"It's not fair unless I'm winning!"

User avatar
Outphaze
Myrmidon
 
Posts: 157
Joined: Jan 24, 2011 23:17

Postby Outphaze » Aug 09, 2013 20:42

Lucifire was telling me that the bard RR5 with dragonskin armor actually provides the bard with ToA bonuses. It adds 10% cast speed, +25 dex cap and +25% to buffs. That is way more OP than ranger rr5 man.
Cheers,
Sailor
---
Image

User avatar
Nef Melody
Phoenix Knight
 
Posts: 1601
Joined: Nov 22, 2010 16:56

Postby Nef Melody » Aug 09, 2013 22:45

Outphaze wrote:Lucifire was telling me that the bard RR5 with dragonskin armor actually provides the bard with ToA bonuses. It adds 10% cast speed, +25 dex cap and +25% to buffs. That is way more OP than ranger rr5 man.


0/10
Nefcait : Bard
Gua : Enchanter
My Youtube Channel : https://www.youtube.com/user/ReqVids/videos

User avatar
Celteen
Alerion Knight
 
Posts: 2326
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 16:52

Postby Celteen » Aug 10, 2013 02:09

Rangers? who cares about stealthers. This topic at least does influence RvR.
Image
<<< This avatar is handmade by Inotor Wurzelbert : )
Check out the Mampfer-Threads for more.
viewtopic.php?f=10&t=25079
viewtopic.php?f=10&t=26934

User avatar
Benga
Warder
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Oct 17, 2009 00:00

Postby Benga » Aug 12, 2013 12:44

Outphaze wrote:Lucifire was telling me that the bard RR5 with dragonskin armor actually provides the bard with ToA bonuses. It adds 10% cast speed, +25 dex cap and +25% to buffs. That is way more OP than ranger rr5 man.


Muahahah, had to give this a 'Like' :lol:

Nir
Warder
 
Posts: 18
Joined: Jul 22, 2013 04:26

Postby Nir » Aug 12, 2013 16:43

Give Midgard either a petspam option

OR

Remove animist class. I see at the top of my browser Uthgard - Classic Freeshard. Animist class was introduced with SI, I don`t see SI in this game. So don`t call this server a classic freeshard.

So rigged.

User avatar
RonELuvv
Alerion Knight
 
Posts: 1995
Joined: Apr 13, 2010 00:00

Postby RonELuvv » Aug 12, 2013 20:24

Sorry Nir, but its already been stated that SI is coming to the server. Abydos and company have been working on it for awhile now. So I guess that answers your post. Just curious why you picked animist and not the other SI classes that are implemented. Reaver comes to mind...

Previous

Return to Realm versus Realm

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests

Wednesday, 07. May 2025

Artwork and screen shots Copyright © 2001-2004 Mythic Entertainment, Inc. All rights reserved. Used with permission of Mythic Entertainment. Mythic Entertainment, the Mythic Entertainment logo, "Dark Age of Camelot," "Shrouded Isles," "Foundations," "New Frontiers," "Trials of Atlantis," "Catacombs," "Darkness Rising," the Dark Age of Camelot and subsequent logos, and the stylized Celtic knot are trademarks of Mythic Entertainment, Inc.

Valid XHTML & CSS | Original Design by: LernVid.com | Modified by Uthgard Staff