rvr zones usage (split)

Talk about your RvR experience here
nixian
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 5450
Joined: May 19, 2006 00:00

Postby nixian » May 12, 2010 18:00

The problem is that somehow rvr doesn't seem to be able to co-exist with 8v8 and 1v1.. which means those playstyles must move elsewhere (mid/alb zones)

Tobletwo
Banned
 
Posts: 144
Joined: May 12, 2010 00:00

Postby Tobletwo » May 12, 2010 18:30

Gil wrote:I do agree that DAoC is a game and games must be fun or people stop playing. DAoC is a game about REALM vs REALM however not GROUP vs GROUP (except here on Uth).


Are you kidding me ? 8v8 has been the dominating form of rvr on live for years, especially after all the zerglings, addlings and nooblings moved to WoW.

User avatar
vangonaj
Alerion Knight
 
Posts: 2497
Joined: Sep 14, 2007 00:00
Location: Galpen

Postby vangonaj » May 12, 2010 18:34

Tobletwo wrote:Are you kidding me ? 8v8 has been the dominating form of rvr on live for years, especially after all the zerglings, addlings and nooblings moved to WoW.



Rofl. Daoc was designed for zerg. Add or not add is player choise. And if you want find perfect balance you should find it for zerg and not for fg. And this is very easy explain why.
Image

Tobletwo
Banned
 
Posts: 144
Joined: May 12, 2010 00:00

Postby Tobletwo » May 12, 2010 18:35

If daoc was designed for zerg why is group cap 8 people ? I didn't see anywhere in the manual saying the game is made only for zerging, care to point it out for me ?

User avatar
vangonaj
Alerion Knight
 
Posts: 2497
Joined: Sep 14, 2007 00:00
Location: Galpen

Postby vangonaj » May 12, 2010 18:39

Only for convenience, but we have bgs. If daoc is only for 8vs8 action, why we can build bgs?
Image

Tobletwo
Banned
 
Posts: 144
Joined: May 12, 2010 00:00

Postby Tobletwo » May 12, 2010 18:47

vangonaj wrote:Only for convenience, but we have bgs. If daoc is only for 8vs8 action, why we can build bgs?


To split loot easier in PvE. Next question ?

User avatar
vangonaj
Alerion Knight
 
Posts: 2497
Joined: Sep 14, 2007 00:00
Location: Galpen

Postby vangonaj » May 12, 2010 18:55

Is only one of his utilities. And if daoc is designed for 8 players, all hard mobs should be killable by 8 (i mean legion, dragon...).
Image

Tobletwo
Banned
 
Posts: 144
Joined: May 12, 2010 00:00

Postby Tobletwo » May 12, 2010 19:21

They are killable with 8 players. And I don't see how endgame MOBS are related to rvr ?

Is there any rvr utility attached to the battlegroup option besides communication (for which you could also use chatgroups, broad, yelling etc.) ?

Zarkor
Unicorn Knight
 
Posts: 3710
Joined: Aug 15, 2006 00:00
Location: Antwerp, Flanders, Belgium

Postby Zarkor » May 12, 2010 19:31

DAoC was designed for RvR, period.

RvR however includes 1v1s aswell as 8v8s and ZergvZerg fights. Just aswell as it includes ZergvSolo fights etc.


To investigate the balance situation, the 8v8 RvR is your best shot at getting a clear picture since it's A) the most common and B) the most overall, meaning it involves the most classes.

If 8v8 RvR is balanced, ZergvZerg is also relatively balanced as long as the numbers/classes are somewhat equal.


You can't pick 1v1 as a balance standard simply because there's too many classes excluded from such equations, however having a minimum balance level for this type of RvR without affecting anything else is always welcome. The other reason is that having pure 1v1 balance will most likely harm 8v8 balance, just as pure 8v8 balance will harm 1v1 balance. You need to find a good inbetween.
This is also another reason why perfect balance doesn't exist though.

User avatar
vangonaj
Alerion Knight
 
Posts: 2497
Joined: Sep 14, 2007 00:00
Location: Galpen

Postby vangonaj » May 12, 2010 19:43

In my opinion 8vs8 chase is bad for find balance. Because all realms have more than 8 different classes, and there are abilities, that could stay out of group, and make imbalance.
This is my opinion.
Image

User avatar
Gil
Alerion Knight
 
Posts: 2061
Joined: Jan 06, 2010 01:00
Location: Denmark

Postby Gil » May 12, 2010 20:01

Zarkor wrote:DAoC was designed for RvR, period.

RvR however includes 1v1s aswell as 8v8s and ZergvZerg fights. Just aswell as it includes ZergvSolo fights etc.


To investigate the balance situation, the 8v8 RvR is your best shot at getting a clear picture since it's A) the most common and B) the most overall, meaning it involves the most classes.

If 8v8 RvR is balanced, ZergvZerg is also relatively balanced as long as the numbers/classes are somewhat equal.


You can't pick 1v1 as a balance standard simply because there's too many classes excluded from such equations, however having a minimum balance level for this type of RvR without affecting anything else is always welcome. The other reason is that having pure 1v1 balance will most likely harm 8v8 balance, just as pure 8v8 balance will harm 1v1 balance. You need to find a good inbetween.
This is also another reason why perfect balance doesn't exist though.

I agree 100% with this post.

User avatar
Seyha
Phoenix Knight
 
Posts: 1726
Joined: Apr 25, 2009 00:00
Location: Schadenfreude City, USA

Postby Seyha » May 13, 2010 00:04

Zarkor wrote:RvR however includes 1v1s aswell as 8v8s and ZergvZerg fights. Just aswell as it includes ZergvSolo fights etc.


This is the biggest myth in DAoC. RvR is not designed for 1v1 or 3v3 or 8v8. If it were then these play styles would have their own unique contributions to make in RvR warfare. They do not.

RvR is designed for the absolute lowest common denominator zerg warfare. Everything about RvR in DAoC is founded on this principle. No accommodation of any sort is made for 1v1 or 8v8 but there is nothing to stop a zerg from rolling people all day.

All this E-Sports Pro 8v8 ONLY DON'T ADD OR I'LL FLAME YOU ON VN crap only came about after ToA gutted the casual player-base on Live. If you want set Group vs. Group with no adds then go play Guild Wars.
Last edited by Seyha on May 13, 2010 00:09, edited 1 time in total.
Luzifa: freak
Luzifa: delete your freak
Luzifa: seyha why you always coward?
Luzifa: running valkyn freak

Tobletwo
Banned
 
Posts: 144
Joined: May 12, 2010 00:00

Postby Tobletwo » May 13, 2010 00:09

I'd really like to see that official statement or game manual quote where it says the game is designed solely for zerging. Just accept that you're bad and have to add or outnumber to win instead of making up things like "that's how it's meant to be".

User avatar
Seyha
Phoenix Knight
 
Posts: 1726
Joined: Apr 25, 2009 00:00
Location: Schadenfreude City, USA

Postby Seyha » May 13, 2010 00:11

Tobletwo wrote:I'd really like to see that official statement or game manual quote where it says the game is designed solely for zerging. Just accept that you're bad and have to add or outnumber to win instead of making up things like "that's how it's meant to be".


I never zerg, and I don't add fair fights.

How about you point out the game feature or mechanic that specifically allows 1v1 or 8v8 to occur without the possibility of adds/zergs crashing your party?
Luzifa: freak
Luzifa: delete your freak
Luzifa: seyha why you always coward?
Luzifa: running valkyn freak

Tobletwo
Banned
 
Posts: 144
Joined: May 12, 2010 00:00

Postby Tobletwo » May 13, 2010 00:14

Seyha wrote:I never zerg, and I don't add fair fights.


Odd, I personally killed you with my mentalist when we fought 2 fgs of mids with 1 group in uppland the few nights ago when we took your relics. Must have been somebody else playing your character ? And you've added plenty of "fair fights" if by fair you mean equal numbers, just yesterday you and another sb added one 8v8 fight and killed our theurgist. You used rr5 to get away from me.

I never said there's a game mechanic that doesn't allow lame gameplay but I'm not saying that my preferred playstyle is according to the imaginary mythic holy bible either :roll:

PreviousNext

Return to Realm versus Realm

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 63 guests

Thursday, 15. May 2025

Artwork and screen shots Copyright © 2001-2004 Mythic Entertainment, Inc. All rights reserved. Used with permission of Mythic Entertainment. Mythic Entertainment, the Mythic Entertainment logo, "Dark Age of Camelot," "Shrouded Isles," "Foundations," "New Frontiers," "Trials of Atlantis," "Catacombs," "Darkness Rising," the Dark Age of Camelot and subsequent logos, and the stylized Celtic knot are trademarks of Mythic Entertainment, Inc.

Valid XHTML & CSS | Original Design by: LernVid.com | Modified by Uthgard Staff