This is how golden rule is kept under consideration: after 8mangrp adds my fight i add theirs in a very nice inc against Requiems.

After 5 seconds i get IRC message:
<[Rotla]Bajan> gz man
<[Rotla]Bajan> ruined a nice fight
<Cenzah|Glasgow> keep killing me 1v1
<Cenzah|Glasgow> gz
<[Rotla]Bajan> thats why we always will kill stealther like u
<Cenzah|Glasgow> i never added on 8v8
<Cenzah|Glasgow> you kill me 1v1
<Cenzah|Glasgow> i add your 8v8
<Cenzah|Glasgow> you ruin my game
<Cenzah|Glasgow> i ruin yours
<Cenzah|Glasgow> can't see smth wrong
<[Rotla]Bajan> [21:55] Cenzah|Glasgow you kill me 1v1
<[Rotla]Bajan> when?
<[Rotla]Bajan> 3 way?
<[Rotla]Bajan> or u vs an alb?
<Cenzah|Glasgow> me vs alb/mid
<Cenzah|Glasgow> stealthers
<[Rotla]Bajan> 3 way
<[Rotla]Bajan> is 3 way
<[Rotla]Bajan> we NEVER disturb a 1v1 if its alb vs hib/mid
<Cenzah|Glasgow> mate
<Cenzah|Glasgow> is also vs alb
<Cenzah|Glasgow> i was vs zailow
<Cenzah|Glasgow> you killed me
<Cenzah|Glasgow> i don't care
<Cenzah|Glasgow> but then i add you
<Cenzah|Glasgow> and i can't see why u QQing
<[Rotla]Bajan> k,lets continue then
<[Rotla]Bajan>
<Cenzah|Glasgow> np you started
<[Rotla]Bajan> sure =)

Then, i start thinking that ppl never consider who is the stealther thei are killing. He is only a "stealther who always would have added their fights". Now it really happens from me, i get instaQQ.

Cheers

Lol, love it That is so true I've had many people (no names) that have had similiar conversations with me. The difference is that if it becomes a problem with certain toons I will write down dates and when they added me. Had many people say something along the lines of your coversation. After I prove to them where they added on my fights in the past it usually ends with a, "Sorry..." from the person who originally sent me a tell Cracks me up.

pff you are all wrong.

the others started

i think a prolem for fg's is when you start to think about kill this stealther/solo, dont kill this one you waste a lot of time. And if it's just arguing in ts (there is always one who had good experience with this and other the opposite)... we had that for a while and had often inc during arguing about if to kill the stealther/solo or not, lost the fight (sometimes the stealther/solo still addet).
That p.issed the ones of who were pro killing the stealther/solo... so we agreed on killing all without discussions. Thats just fair and easy and everone should know what he is up to when he meets us.

I suppose that's fair. Today a few different FG left me alone so now whenever i see those players i wont add them. However i do know to add you mr. holsten on sight just cause of your policy of killing all solo. might as well since you're going to kill me if you can anyway lol

the only really true answer comes from holsten. i agree 100% with his opinion. Straight RVR ! and nothing more.
i dont care if any1 add me. and i dont care if i add others. but i think the word "add" should be banned.

Topaz wrote:the only really true answer comes from holsten. i agree 100% with his opinion. Straight RVR ! and nothing more.
i dont care if any1 add me. and i dont care if i add others. but i think the word "add" should be banned.

i prefer freedom of speech

holsten-knight wrote:Thats just fair

No.

holsten-knight wrote:and easy

Yes.

this what all here called "add", help to make the game to its proper sense. namely RVR ^^
it learns people to play correct RVR and not fair honor and other crap.
and it takes a great learning effect at the players who pray the whole time about fairness!!

Topaz wrote:it learns people to play correct RVR and not fair honor and other crap.

throw your principles over board, just be an asshole !!!

Bloodwyne wrote:

Topaz wrote:it learns people to play correct RVR and not fair honor and other crap.

throw your principles over board, just be an asshole !!!

+1

The only rule I saw so far on my login screen was

If it's red it's dead

i should have bet holsten 5p over this thread getting closed or not

Mauriac wrote:i should have bet holsten 5p over this thread getting closed or not

Well, if you would he could just spam some flame and it would be closed ;P

He tried and failed though