horseroutes

Talk about your RvR experience here
Zarkor
Unicorn Knight
 
Posts: 3710
Joined: Aug 15, 2006 00:00
Location: Antwerp, Flanders, Belgium

Postby Zarkor » Jan 10, 2010 13:45

arnius wrote:Why only solo's? Like blue stated before in another thread in this forum,
bonus should be given to smallgroups as well, cause running around as a solo pac/mend healer or a solo enhance/rejuv cleric is impossible.

1char = +100%
2chars = +75%
3chars = +50%
4chars = +25%
5 and above = +0%

I would adjust this a little bit to make the bonus for solo's vs smallgroup even more worth while.

1char = +100%
2chars = +60%
3chars = +30%
4chars = +15%
5 and above = +0%

However this still doesn't ballance the bp/rp gain for visible vs unvisible chars but that is an other discussion.
[especially the fact that casters are easy kills on this server, :s ]
> see the many whine threads, :)


I guess you have a point somewhat, but the fact that you have a support class in group also adds to the survivability and it's not like you don't get any BPs without a bonus. ;)

I think it's best to keep the bonusses for soloers since smallmans will mainly be attracted to there because they can hunt solos anyway, they don't really need to be given the incentive, imo easy targets will be incentive enough for them.

Keep in mind that the BP bonus's goal is to be an incentive for solos (and therefore also smallman since solos are easy and worthwhile kills to them) to go to a perticular zone instead of creating a way for them to farm BPs better. Currently the BP flow is ok for any grped character, but kinda low for solos, hence you can kill 2 birds with one stone so to speak.

:cry:


Well, what can I say, I try to give feedback about what possible playstyles OF still lacks, which is solo action, especially in prime time since Emain is simply suicide with a timer on it then, especially for visibles.

I don't just go "ohh see? I told you OF would suck, there, give NF now pls or I quit the server kk thx". I try to think it out and give suggestions on how to improve this and give players who want to for instance solo/smallman instead of do 8v8 or pug on primetime the opportunity to do so. Instead of being forced to play BGs for that kind of action, so that in the long run, everyone can have fun in their own way in OF any time they want, which is imo what DAoC (RvR) is about after all.


Maybe you don't like the fact that staff listens to me, but that's most likely because I actually suggest constructive and reasonable improvements to the situation instead of just QQing about it. I do what I can to make the best out of it and I'm always happy when I hear good suggestions or theories from anyone else because everything I say will still always be only just my opinion and ideas. It's better to be able to pick the best out of many, I agree, but I've hardly seen anyone do so. Especially not the ones that do nothing by cry about everything all the time... Probably because most people are too busy thinking what they want just for themselves instead of what would benefit the server in general.


PS: I created the first English speaking Hib RvR guild, and I didn't do so so I can solo with "a SI class for 'nice and fair' 1 on 1 fights"... I play in a guild FG whenever I get the chance, but when I only have 30minutes or we don't have enough players online I rather be able to do some smallman/solo without having to log BG chars for that, which is what I can imagine full-time solo or smallman players are doing currently.

User avatar
Galandriel
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 239
Joined: Nov 14, 2009 01:00

Postby Galandriel » Jan 10, 2010 13:54

I don't just go "ohh see? I told you OF would suck, there, give NF now pls or I quit the server kk thx".


maybe the best suggestion so far, which

Maybe you don't like the fact that staff listens to me, but that's most likely because I actually QQ most


could solve this big problem : P
Last edited by Galandriel on Jan 10, 2010 13:56, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
infi
Warder
 
Posts: 48
Joined: Nov 15, 2009 01:00

Postby infi » Jan 10, 2010 13:55

Zarkor wrote:Maybe you don't like the fact that staff listens to me, but that's most likely because I actually suggest constructive and reasonable improvements to the situation instead of just QQing about it.


horseroutes are not improvements to rvr ffs!

Zarkor
Unicorn Knight
 
Posts: 3710
Joined: Aug 15, 2006 00:00
Location: Antwerp, Flanders, Belgium

Postby Zarkor » Jan 10, 2010 14:38

infi wrote:
Zarkor wrote:Maybe you don't like the fact that staff listens to me, but that's most likely because I actually suggest constructive and reasonable improvements to the situation instead of just QQing about it.


horseroutes are not improvements to rvr ffs!


An explanation would be nice... :roll:

If you don't need them, simply don't use them. They aren't ment as a magicly a better or faster way for grps with speedclasses to get to the secondary zones... They're there to help non speeder players/grps to get to the action, which I guess you don't care about.


@Galandriel, editing posts clearly shows your (lack of) maturity, not to mention your posting history is one big trollingcompilation.... I couldn't care less about you. :D

User avatar
Galandriel
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 239
Joined: Nov 14, 2009 01:00

Postby Galandriel » Jan 10, 2010 15:01

Image

User avatar
MT-Pear
Phoenix Knight
 
Posts: 1158
Joined: Mar 10, 2006 01:00

Postby MT-Pear » Jan 10, 2010 15:09

xD

Nymeros
Phoenix Knight
 
Posts: 1426
Joined: Apr 12, 2009 00:00

Postby Nymeros » Jan 10, 2010 15:29

Trolling is one thing. Badly trolling is another. But badly trolling in German is like... reroll IRL material.

Zarkor
Unicorn Knight
 
Posts: 3710
Joined: Aug 15, 2006 00:00
Location: Antwerp, Flanders, Belgium

Postby Zarkor » Jan 10, 2010 15:31

Nymeros wrote:Trolling is one thing. Badly trolling is another. But badly trolling in German is like... reroll IRL material.


Rofl! :lol:

Camulos
Phoenix Knight
 
Posts: 1361
Joined: Sep 17, 2008 00:00

Postby Camulos » Jan 10, 2010 16:07

Zarkor wrote:[...]
Maybe you don't like the fact that staff listens to me, but that's most likely because I actually suggest constructive and reasonable improvements to the situation instead of just QQing about it. [...]

Since when?

And @Galandriel
Stop spamming topics with nothing but flame, flambaits and offtopic. First and last warning.

Camulos

Zarkor
Unicorn Knight
 
Posts: 3710
Joined: Aug 15, 2006 00:00
Location: Antwerp, Flanders, Belgium

Postby Zarkor » Jan 10, 2010 16:40

Camulos wrote:
Zarkor wrote:[...]
Maybe you don't like the fact that staff listens to me, but that's most likely because I actually suggest constructive and reasonable improvements to the situation instead of just QQing about it. [...]

Since when?


Well if you can't tell the difference then that's not my fault. :roll:

Camulos
Phoenix Knight
 
Posts: 1361
Joined: Sep 17, 2008 00:00

Postby Camulos » Jan 10, 2010 16:49

Well, i think you massively overvalue your postings, but well...;-)

Zarkor
Unicorn Knight
 
Posts: 3710
Joined: Aug 15, 2006 00:00
Location: Antwerp, Flanders, Belgium

Postby Zarkor » Jan 10, 2010 17:01

Camulos wrote:Well, i think you massively overvalue your postings, but well...;-)


Heheh, I do for some, I'll admit that. :)

User avatar
Cary
Warder
 
Posts: 38
Joined: Mar 24, 2009 01:00

Postby Cary » Jan 10, 2010 17:26

Zarkor wrote:Maybe you don't like the fact that staff listens to me, but that's most likely because I actually suggest constructive and reasonable improvements to the situation instead of just QQing about it.


You are not making suggesting improvements, you are promoting your opinion to be an improvement.
Due to sheer flood of posts, it seemed that there was actually a problem.

But look at a thread like "Dead RvR", it has 200 posts. When you look further, you see that 22 posts came from Zarkor and 21 from Nymeros. Repetitive stating your opinions about the terrible state of RvR

Now the silent majority, that actually liked RvR is stuck to those horse routes, that DO influence their gameplay.

Nymeros
Phoenix Knight
 
Posts: 1426
Joined: Apr 12, 2009 00:00

Postby Nymeros » Jan 10, 2010 17:47

Neither I nor Zarkor actually started the "Dead RvR" thread. So, lol?

Since you "counted" our posts, please now go and count the number of people who with just one post also expressed that they were dissatisfied.

Both me and Zarkor actually disagree on many issues, but unlike you people we still manage to have constructive discussions about them.

Plus, the staff has said many times that it doesn't interest them who posts the most.


And finally, you are free to make any sort of objective criticism of anything you like, but instead all you seem capable of is whining like a child and blaming others.

The solo community, that actually liked RvR too I might add, was stuck to NOT BEING ABLE TO PLAY. How's that for influencing gameplay?

Zarkor
Unicorn Knight
 
Posts: 3710
Joined: Aug 15, 2006 00:00
Location: Antwerp, Flanders, Belgium

Postby Zarkor » Jan 10, 2010 18:02

Nymeros wrote:Both me and Zarkor actually disagree on many issues, but unlike you people we still manage to have constructive discussions about them.

...

And finally, you are free to make any sort of objective criticism of anything you like, but instead all you seem capable of is whining like a child and blaming others.


+1

PreviousNext

Return to Realm versus Realm

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests

Saturday, 30. August 2025

Artwork and screen shots Copyright © 2001-2004 Mythic Entertainment, Inc. All rights reserved. Used with permission of Mythic Entertainment. Mythic Entertainment, the Mythic Entertainment logo, "Dark Age of Camelot," "Shrouded Isles," "Foundations," "New Frontiers," "Trials of Atlantis," "Catacombs," "Darkness Rising," the Dark Age of Camelot and subsequent logos, and the stylized Celtic knot are trademarks of Mythic Entertainment, Inc.

Valid XHTML & CSS | Original Design by: LernVid.com | Modified by Uthgard Staff