Old RA-System

Talk about your RvR experience here

You really like the old RA System?

Yes, I have read your thread, but I still like it.
53
51%
No, I think you are right, I dont like it.
38
37%
I dont care.
12
12%
 
Total votes : 103

jrhadden
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 938
Joined: Jun 02, 2005 00:00

Postby jrhadden » Aug 14, 2008 15:55

Well its evade 3 vs evade 7

Each evade gives u 5%

And now u spec dodge ...

And dont forget Duel Wield reduces evade chanced... so infi,ns = duel wield vs hunter = 2h ... hm^^

Bow: True sight once in 30min .. well thats sure funny to play.
Inactive

User avatar
malle
Banned
 
Posts: 632
Joined: Jul 13, 2007 00:00

Postby malle » Aug 14, 2008 16:03

wayne evade skill for assasins, they allready have cap evade cause of detaunting (seems like a bug imo) so dodger wouldnt make sense for them.

User avatar
Nammoth
Myrmidon
 
Posts: 121
Joined: Apr 09, 2008 00:00

Postby Nammoth » Aug 14, 2008 16:44

Actually huge amount of stuff would be gimped. Augment Stats would be weaker then NF, ignore pain would seriously suck, Mastery of pain, mastery of blocking and parrying would be ALOT worse then NF.

And one thing noone mentioned - tanks with stoicism. Friend and i discussed this and we think savage would be way to OP. OF deter reduces duration for 75%, stoicism 25%.

25%+75%= hint ?

Basically you have useless bard and useless ministrel.

Friends druid has movie where savage 2 shots him (keep in mind hes lvl50, rr4, full sced druid). Now imagine savage that cant be CCed. Way OP.

Another thing. IMO evade doesnt work as it should atm. Its way way too strong. For example, i had hero with 50+16 block, mob3, i would block maybe 1 of 10 infi/sb hits. But Infi/sb would evade almost 50-60% of my swings. Give them more evades and that would be awesome (for them ofcourse).

User avatar
malle
Banned
 
Posts: 632
Joined: Jul 13, 2007 00:00

Postby malle » Aug 14, 2008 16:59

savage dont have stoicism ^^ but afaik in of there wasnt the ability stoicism so.. ^^ and evade is capped at 50% assasins got evade cap allready now.

and why is ip senseless? u need to spend half of the points and get 100% ip ? ^^

User avatar
Alandrian
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 795
Joined: Jun 22, 2005 00:00

Postby Alandrian » Aug 14, 2008 17:39

100% det ;).
Stoicism was introduced with NF RAs. Thats the reason why the new det5 is lower than the old one. But back then the tanks that have now stoicism were the only one that could specc det at all.
Alandrian

User avatar
Ranius
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 440
Joined: Aug 24, 2006 00:00

Postby Ranius » Aug 14, 2008 18:05

malle wrote:savage dont have stoicism ^^


Are you sure? As I remember they have.

User avatar
Rector
Alerion Knight
 
Posts: 2744
Joined: Mar 02, 2006 01:00

Postby Rector » Aug 14, 2008 18:13


User avatar
Ranius
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 440
Joined: Aug 24, 2006 00:00

Postby Ranius » Aug 14, 2008 19:13

It would be fair if they don't, but hell, it's a mid class.

User avatar
Alandrian
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 795
Joined: Jun 22, 2005 00:00

Postby Alandrian » Aug 14, 2008 20:02

They dont have instants to rupt. So they are fulltanks. -> fulldet (OF) or Stoicism (NF)
Alandrian

User avatar
panachier
Banned
 
Posts: 2267
Joined: Apr 04, 2006 00:00

Postby panachier » Aug 14, 2008 20:14

warden/infi/SB/archers have no insta to rupt but they can spec melee and they are not full tank...

there is no real difference between a savage and a reaver... one insta self buff other one insta debuff...
<img src="http://www.fallenearth.fr/daoc/daoc2.php?player=Panachou">

User avatar
Flamingfury
Banned
 
Posts: 253
Joined: Apr 11, 2008 00:00

Postby Flamingfury » Aug 14, 2008 23:47

panachier wrote:warden/infi/SB/archers have no insta to rupt but they can spec melee and they are not full tank...

So why are you comparing them ?

panachier wrote:there is no real difference between a savage and a reaver... one insta self buff other one insta debuff...

You're either clueless about reavers or savages... or both.

User avatar
malle
Banned
 
Posts: 632
Joined: Jul 13, 2007 00:00

Postby malle » Aug 15, 2008 00:28

they got it with 1.83 so they dont have it on uth afaik^^

User avatar
Duke
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 629
Joined: Jan 12, 2006 01:00
Location: MB the Realm 4

Postby Duke » Aug 15, 2008 01:09

Blabla don't look just at your own class, others loose stuff too.

Yes but look at Hiberniangrpsetup:

Warden Ressis: No need of Ressis - just take grppurge / AM
AoG: Not anymore
VR: Not anymore
RR5: Not anymore
TWF: is uselesse already -> Determination stops the at getting snared senseful

Hibernia would better invite a 3rd Druid or a seccond Bard than a Warden. There were these people already who just took a Warden because of high RR reasons.

I am a grp player and I made everything for the grp, I specced for it or respecced for it.

The good NF RAs are working fine. A step back too old RAs is like give us back old emain, I had fun those times - but don't look at the negative consequences of it. Maybe your class has more luck, but I guess that there have to be more classes that have the same problem.

I adress at all those who don't like old RAs post it here - tell those who think the same too also take part of the vote and vote no!



Duke

User avatar
salbei
Phoenix Knight
 
Posts: 1467
Joined: Oct 27, 2006 00:00

Postby salbei » Aug 15, 2008 02:01

omg duke !

warden got the cc resists (the most important of all resists)
warden got base buffs
warden got pbt
warden is decent rupt
warden can heal - not compareable with a druid ,but they do
and twf is another thing that´s making the class very attractive for groups.
it´s such a versatile class that running without it would spell certain doom for the group vs. a decent setup.

why shouldn´t you want one with your group :roll: ?

you shouldn´t judge classes just by looking at their active ra´s^^

you still got the same ammount of specpoint - you still get the same by speccing the same there is no difference at all . the only difference is that you get stripped active ra´s that you should never have gotten in the first place.

User avatar
Flamingfury
Banned
 
Posts: 253
Joined: Apr 11, 2008 00:00

Postby Flamingfury » Aug 15, 2008 02:21

Amen Salbei.

PreviousNext

Return to Realm versus Realm

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests

Thursday, 04. September 2025

Artwork and screen shots Copyright © 2001-2004 Mythic Entertainment, Inc. All rights reserved. Used with permission of Mythic Entertainment. Mythic Entertainment, the Mythic Entertainment logo, "Dark Age of Camelot," "Shrouded Isles," "Foundations," "New Frontiers," "Trials of Atlantis," "Catacombs," "Darkness Rising," the Dark Age of Camelot and subsequent logos, and the stylized Celtic knot are trademarks of Mythic Entertainment, Inc.

Valid XHTML & CSS | Original Design by: LernVid.com | Modified by Uthgard Staff