jrhadden wrote:This survey is manipulative. Dont put the phrase "old emain" into a survey without the "new emain (like before)" vote-option. Because alot people dont read the text at all.

Thats why I wrote "Old Emain Macha (Old Frontiers)".
Even if one or two players didn't read the text and thought that option would mean NF Emain Macha, that does not really doom this survey.

ich sach nur OF FTW !

Agramon+homezone+boats instead of teleports for bridges.

We need more votes for Old Frontiers. But.. RAs will be the same as right now ?

I like the idea of Old Emain but as far as i know the new client's don't even have this zone anymore. How will you make it possible to play there?

Ronian wrote:But.. RAs will be the same as right now ?

Of course it would be a dream to have the old realm abilities, but I'm afraid there are not enough reliable sources for them. In addition it would mean a lot of work and on top of that many players would not like them, I'm afraid.

Heli wrote:as far as i know the new client's don't even have this zone anymore

The european versions have those zones even in version 1.91+.

instant50 has the old emain up now

Ive been playing it, its pretty fun, yes you will get killed by groups and zergs, but you will anyway, think about if, if youre solo, where do you go? You cant hide...

vote for old emain

old emain rulez

OF would bring so many players ! omagad give it us !

If you want old emain vote for cathal, it's the same. Anyway I prefer new frontiers

I Do not understand people that vote for Agramon, the last 2 Freeshards I played closed down after they switched to Agramon.

Everyone votes for it but it is WAAAY too large, the terrain makes it difficult to find enemies.

Old emain ROOOOCKS! It would go with the whole classic theme.

OF is also large .... but agramon is balanced ....

Rent wrote:OF is also large .... but agramon is balanced ....

I am sure that not the whole OF area will be the future RvR area..

lol if we got back to OF

would be kool to see if you change the areas from hib/alb/mid every 4 months just to give it a idea like the weathers changeing

alb spring hib summer mid erm ya winter!

I hated when mythtic got ride of OF to set up there new idea, would be nice to see those rolling hills again :+)

Sometimes I can't understand why people wants to go backwards than forwards. They are afraid changes or they don't like changes? No. People don't want to be the change in a world that don't like changes. They prefer to go backwards or someone judge unfair a not guilty person than stay with him and guard him with any costs.

On subject now. As i see at poll, there is a huge list of people asking Agramon 3 towers + 1 keep and Old Emain. If someone think about the poll, he will think that is cheated. There are too much answers that maybe most of them are taken wrong. People must taken options without think about them. Old Emain is like (how i can tell it...) walk backwards in time trap? Also is unfair setup if a realm is between the 2 others as middle protectors. Agramon setup is like something i had listen in a conversation at pre-current setup. Asking for that is like we liked the idea of the currect setup but it isnt this that we wanted, so switch to agramon old setup.

I prefer current setup. Is more fair for all. BUT it need some changes because some things dont works properly.

My suggestions are the following. Agrammon is empty and it decourages people going there. There must be a neutral keep (or something else) with some towers perhaps as many people asked for it. Role of those keep/towers is for holding df. If those keep/towers are normally guarded by df-like mobs is great. No holder = no df. If time passed without a realm mate team reset a timer at their holder keep/towers the keep/towers fall back at arms of df forces and df closes again for everybody.

Home keeps and towers must be like bg ones. Holding your own keep/towers gives a minor bonus on exp/gold/rp/craft. Holding enemy keep/towers gives a major bonus on exp/gold/rp/craft.

Those for now and we will see at near future.