Change RvR zone

Talk about your RvR experience here
Braxis
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 834
Joined: Jun 03, 2009 00:00

Postby Braxis » Jan 31, 2011 13:33

Hoppip wrote:Thank you, Uthgard Staff, for taking the time to implement the Old Frontier maps and world, but upon extensive playing in this ruleset, the general consensus is that few players actually enjoy it. Please re-instate the New Frontiers maps, and abandon any work towards bringing back archaic game functions.

Well stated.
nixian wrote:semi classic state --> full classic state = evolving

User avatar
Blue
Developer
Developer
 
Posts: 15827
Joined: Apr 22, 2005 00:00

Postby Blue » Jan 31, 2011 13:52

Most of you just want Agramon and instant ports. Without these instant ports there was a LOT of NF whining in these forums. No, thanks. On top of that our NF setting had less players than we have in OF now. We will continue to improve OF first before we even consider NF again.

Also you may consider to reread http://uthgard.net/index.php?option=com ... 32&t=10985

And in case you forgot that BG's were always prefered on Uthgard and the problems Agramon had read this: http://uthgard.net/index.php?option=com ... =32&t=8837
It's done when it's done. Thanks for your patience.
Every bug gets fixed. Sooner or later.

"It is an inescapable law of nature that the amount of satisfaction one gains from achieving something
is related to how hard it is and easy things can only elicit a fleeting superficial sort of pleasure."


Blue says, "you used macro tools or macro keyboard"
Pala says, "i am disabled. and i have a mechanic left hand that can be programed. its hard to play woith one hand"

[Appeal] Bxxxxxxxx: "why is RA first aid cann man i stealth use and not unstealth cann man ra if man use unstealth ?????????"
BannedUser: "i was not using automate game action my hand was fall on keyboard during i was sleep .... i was completly fall on keyboard ..."

Disdain
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 463
Joined: Nov 23, 2010 13:23

Postby Disdain » Jan 31, 2011 14:29

Blue wrote:Most of you just want Agramon and instant ports. Without these instant ports there was a LOT of NF whining in these forums. No, thanks. On top of that our NF setting had less players than we have in OF now. We will continue to improve OF first before we even consider NF again.

Also you may consider to reread http://uthgard.net/index.php?option=com ... 32&t=10985

And in case you forgot that BG's were always prefered on Uthgard and the problems Agramon had read this: http://uthgard.net/index.php?option=com ... =32&t=8837


In everyday rvr there's fewer players than it was in NF. There's more players in battlegrounds and pve. Rvr hasn't improved at all, it's actually worse. Soloing and keep fights are completely dead with OF.

You point toa thread made by an OF fanatic who's actually regretting voting for OF and little problems with agramon that could have easily been solved. OF doesn't have those, OF is flawed as a whole. Everything. 3 huge zones with 12 subzones and most of them unusable due to terrible terrain design, the porting timers, long runs, poor keep/siege design. There's absolutely nothing good about OF.

You have found TWO threads about agramon being insufficient. How many threads about OF being junk have popped since OF launch ? At least 10 times as many ?
The Bird of the Hermes is my name
Eating my Wings to make me tame

User avatar
Blue
Developer
Developer
 
Posts: 15827
Joined: Apr 22, 2005 00:00

Postby Blue » Jan 31, 2011 15:37

I did not search for more threads, these were among the first hits. There are way more threads about NF problems in this forum. Just search for yourself. And its a fact that we have more players in RvR than we did in NF. And tbh whining in NF was a lot stronger than what we have now, it just subsided a bit when we introduced XP spots in Agramon and made instant teleports available.

Btw yesterday I logged in and immediately saw a small keep fight. Isn't it strange? Isn't it strange that keeps are claimed beside you are falsely saying that keeps are dead? We know that keeps need improvements and are on it. But Agramon was not really better as what we have now => Elite FG's roaming around getting others to quit. Forum was full of whining about that. Theres no point to beg for NF. I'm not sure how long you play on Uthgard and know the history of complains about this and that.

I propose before you demand NF wait for changes to happen as there wasn't many since introduction of OF.
It's done when it's done. Thanks for your patience.
Every bug gets fixed. Sooner or later.

"It is an inescapable law of nature that the amount of satisfaction one gains from achieving something
is related to how hard it is and easy things can only elicit a fleeting superficial sort of pleasure."


Blue says, "you used macro tools or macro keyboard"
Pala says, "i am disabled. and i have a mechanic left hand that can be programed. its hard to play woith one hand"

[Appeal] Bxxxxxxxx: "why is RA first aid cann man i stealth use and not unstealth cann man ra if man use unstealth ?????????"
BannedUser: "i was not using automate game action my hand was fall on keyboard during i was sleep .... i was completly fall on keyboard ..."

User avatar
holsten-knight
Lion Knight
 
Posts: 4449
Joined: Jul 15, 2009 00:00
Location: Hamburg

Postby holsten-knight » Jan 31, 2011 15:43

Blue wrote:I did not search for more threads, these were among the first hits. There are way more threads about NF problems in this forum. Just search for yourself. And its a fact that we have more players in RvR than we did in NF. And tbh whining in NF was a lot stronger than what we have now, it just subsided a bit when we introduced XP spots in Agramon and made instant teleports available.

Btw yesterday I logged in and immediately saw a small keep fight. Isn't it strange? Isn't it strange that keeps are claimed beside you are falsely saying that keeps are dead? We know that keeps need improvements and are on it. But Agramon was not really better as what we have now => Elite FG's roaming around getting others to quit. Forum was full of whining about that. Theres no point to beg for NF. I'm not sure how long you play on Uthgard and know the history of complains about this and that.

I propose before you demand NF wait for changes to happen as there wasn't many since introduction of OF.


+1 :grin:

and btw this thread wasn't about switching rvr zones from OF to NF, but a call to the players to bring action to other zones in OF :wink:

Topaz
Myrmidon
 
Posts: 159
Joined: Dec 11, 2010 13:23

Postby Topaz » Jan 31, 2011 16:21

Please re-instate the New Frontiers maps, and abandon any work towards bringing back archaic game functions

exactly this is the only way to more flexible rvr and much more fun.

User avatar
thymon
Warder
 
Posts: 46
Joined: Mar 24, 2009 01:00
Location: France - Marseille

Postby thymon » Jan 31, 2011 17:21

To my point of view. The only problem is waiting for the Gothi. I find that it breaks the rhythm of the game I was tired of waiting for Gothi then we expect the player who missed the Goths and then wait for the Buff. That would be so much more addictive with an instant.

Disdain
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 463
Joined: Nov 23, 2010 13:23

Postby Disdain » Jan 31, 2011 17:43

Blue wrote:I did not search for more threads, these were among the first hits. There are way more threads about NF problems in this forum. Just search for yourself. And its a fact that we have more players in RvR than we did in NF. And tbh whining in NF was a lot stronger than what we have now, it just subsided a bit when we introduced XP spots in Agramon and made instant teleports available.

Btw yesterday I logged in and immediately saw a small keep fight. Isn't it strange? Isn't it strange that keeps are claimed beside you are falsely saying that keeps are dead? We know that keeps need improvements and are on it. But Agramon was not really better as what we have now => Elite FG's roaming around getting others to quit. Forum was full of whining about that. Theres no point to beg for NF. I'm not sure how long you play on Uthgard and know the history of complains about this and that.

I propose before you demand NF wait for changes to happen as there wasn't many since introduction of OF.


Amazing, you see keep fights and large numbers in rvr every time you log in. I on the other hand play every day and often spend a full hour in emain for 0-2 fights before logging out from boredom. Maybe I should also log on once every 6 months for a single fight and claim there's "lots of action omg I just logged on and saw a fight" ? Get real.
The Bird of the Hermes is my name
Eating my Wings to make me tame

User avatar
Bloodwyne
Phoenix Knight
 
Posts: 1102
Joined: May 17, 2008 00:00

Postby Bloodwyne » Jan 31, 2011 19:09

Disdain wrote: Amazing, you see keep fights and large numbers in rvr every time you log in. I on the other hand play every day and often spend a full hour in emain for 0-2 fights before logging out from boredom. Maybe I should also log on once every 6 months for a single fight and claim there's "lots of action omg I just logged on and saw a fight" ? Get real.


and exactly this is the problem, i don't wanna sound to harsh here, but judging by what has been done and what is stated, or taken in consideration or not taken into consideration, the major problem of uthgard is, that people who are very inactive players make the decisions here and think they are right just because in their head it feels like an obvious improvement... has been like that since i play here... not like all decision been made were bad ones.. but jeah i as a very active soloer, pvm'r, 8v8er, zerger and small-grouper* over the years definately say that this is the major problem of this server.
Image

User avatar
Alpha Adept
Myrmidon
 
Posts: 63
Joined: Dec 31, 2010 23:06
Location: USA, California

Postby Alpha Adept » Jan 31, 2011 20:38

OF was designed for a higher server population, at least 1200 to 2000 not 750 at peak. NF made it possible to have the best of both worlds for servers who had a higher player base and PVP server for a lower population.

No matter what staff can say, there is not that much population for balanced OF. Now if we have 1200+ daily I think OF would work fine.

Low population in OF = less action = boredom = less players = less donations.

Staff should stop considering the top 2% of elite guilds/staff/friends and think about the server as a whole and the everyday and casual player.

Tho OF was voted on I find it hard for a 60/40 vote. Kind of a to clean vote imo. But I could be wrong. Maybe the player base didn't know what it was really asking for.

User avatar
Blue
Developer
Developer
 
Posts: 15827
Joined: Apr 22, 2005 00:00

Postby Blue » Jan 31, 2011 22:45

I disagree, NF was not designed for low population. NF was only playable after several tweaks and changes. Most notable direct ports to Agramon. We could have taken a BG instead and it comes to the same point.

OF Emain AMG works especially good in low population times when in NF you would never find your enemy. I'm not sure how many of you really played NF on Uthgard from the beginning.
It's done when it's done. Thanks for your patience.
Every bug gets fixed. Sooner or later.

"It is an inescapable law of nature that the amount of satisfaction one gains from achieving something
is related to how hard it is and easy things can only elicit a fleeting superficial sort of pleasure."


Blue says, "you used macro tools or macro keyboard"
Pala says, "i am disabled. and i have a mechanic left hand that can be programed. its hard to play woith one hand"

[Appeal] Bxxxxxxxx: "why is RA first aid cann man i stealth use and not unstealth cann man ra if man use unstealth ?????????"
BannedUser: "i was not using automate game action my hand was fall on keyboard during i was sleep .... i was completly fall on keyboard ..."

User avatar
Bloodwyne
Phoenix Knight
 
Posts: 1102
Joined: May 17, 2008 00:00

Postby Bloodwyne » Jan 31, 2011 23:28

blue i really respect as a developer and admin, and im thankful for all the work you have done for the server, for us, for yourself over all those years. Really im not buttlicking here i mean that.

Still please let me give you that one advice, leave the subject of RvR to other people
Image

Disdain
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 463
Joined: Nov 23, 2010 13:23

Postby Disdain » Jan 31, 2011 23:35

Blue wrote:OF Emain AMG works especially good in low population times when in NF you would never find your enemy. I'm not sure how many of you really played NF on Uthgard from the beginning.


I did, and it was a lot better than OF is. OF emain amg sucks, you're only looking to get your fight destroyed by lots of stealthers there. Not the kind of enemy I'm looking for :roll: rather have a fair fight. I'm not sure if you ever played.
The Bird of the Hermes is my name
Eating my Wings to make me tame

User avatar
Razzer
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 913
Joined: Jul 04, 2009 00:00
Location: Behind Enemy Lines

Postby Razzer » Jan 31, 2011 23:47

I remember there was a "Player Council" in the past where active players of the realms can discuss (intern) about situations ingame who actually play a lot.
Unfortunately it's a dream that the staff and GMs can both support the server and can actively participate with their player chars.
Uthgard till 2003!

Atasi
Myrmidon
 
Posts: 103
Joined: Jul 30, 2010 00:00

Postby Atasi » Jan 31, 2011 23:55

Razzer wrote:I remember there was a "Player Council" in the past where active players of the realms can discuss (intern) about situations ingame who actually play a lot.
Unfortunately it's a dream that the staff and GMs can both support the server and can actively participate with their player chars.



So I am living the dream ? :lol:

PreviousNext

Return to Realm versus Realm

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests

Monday, 01. September 2025

Artwork and screen shots Copyright © 2001-2004 Mythic Entertainment, Inc. All rights reserved. Used with permission of Mythic Entertainment. Mythic Entertainment, the Mythic Entertainment logo, "Dark Age of Camelot," "Shrouded Isles," "Foundations," "New Frontiers," "Trials of Atlantis," "Catacombs," "Darkness Rising," the Dark Age of Camelot and subsequent logos, and the stylized Celtic knot are trademarks of Mythic Entertainment, Inc.

Valid XHTML & CSS | Original Design by: LernVid.com | Modified by Uthgard Staff