to staff

Talk about your RvR experience here
User avatar
mrpain
Warder
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Oct 18, 2009 00:00

Postby mrpain » Feb 07, 2010 11:54

somebody call the waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaambulance!

Maybe it just appears our realm is op when it really isnt.

There is really no infighting in mid /broad, we mostly get along with eatch other really well, we organize and group well.

People I have met who have come to mid from other realms have told me there is a lot of e-drama in their old realms.

So basicly just learn to play nice with your realm mates and maybe you'd be more pleased with your realm.

User avatar
yukiz
Warder
 
Posts: 34
Joined: Sep 29, 2009 00:00

Postby yukiz » Feb 07, 2010 13:07

I just know that alpt of alb classes were nerfed on live because of alb "zerg". It should not work here. Because alb is not zerg here.

User avatar
Shav
Myrmidon
 
Posts: 168
Joined: Aug 24, 2007 00:00

Postby Shav » Feb 07, 2010 13:13

Musikus wrote:oh..they also tryed alb...all gave up befor reaching level 20 (except glelle with his pala).

and that where not the first mids who tryed alb but regret it.
2 guilds from mid at least tryed to compete as albion FG in big RvR. result was that they gave up befor reaching RR4 (there was no thid at this time)


Not to mention anguish also failed in hib after reaching 50s there :roll:

User avatar
none1
Guardian
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Feb 06, 2010 01:00

Postby none1 » Feb 07, 2010 13:17

well... somehow i also don't understand why mids has bonedancer, hibs has animist, but alb necro is not still implemented.
and animist's shrooms are not dying after owner's dead. i remember i found great shroom farm in df with my infi, killed it's master, but also was killed because all these shrooms nuked me after their master was dead.
It is imposseble to kill sm in 1v1 melee just because it's pet intercepts everything.

User avatar
Shav
Myrmidon
 
Posts: 168
Joined: Aug 24, 2007 00:00

Postby Shav » Feb 07, 2010 13:19

none1 wrote:well... somehow i also don't understand why mids has bonedancer, hibs has animist, but alb necro is not still implemented.
and animist's shrooms are not dying after owner's dead. i remember i found great shroom farm in df with my infi, killed it's master, but also was killed because all these shrooms nuked me after their master was dead.
It is imposseble to kill sm in 1v1 melee just because it's pet intercepts everything.


Animist is useless in rvr without tanglers and bombers working properly so dont count it... There is also shroom limit added to even nerf this class more

User avatar
Musikus
Phoenix Knight
 
Posts: 1753
Joined: Jul 22, 2007 00:00
Location: Achau (bei Wien)

Postby Musikus » Feb 07, 2010 13:44

the shroom limit even exist on live, and there its much more nerfing than here..5 shrooms per animist.
think about that..and yes i know..its a post 1.80 change..but why mytic did that?

by the way..tanglers are working propper.

User avatar
Bizaflare
Myrmidon
 
Posts: 114
Joined: Apr 17, 2009 00:00

Postby Bizaflare » Feb 07, 2010 14:12

Musikus wrote:but why mytic did that?


hum, maybe because shrooms have more hp, nuke harder and animist is the hardest nuking hibclass with more resistance pierce you could ever imagine?
<img src="http://herald.uthgard-server.net/daoc/sig.php?name=Bix&s=7">

Nayru wrote:But yes, it seems as if old realmbilities are better for our setting.


:)

User avatar
Blue
Developer
Developer
 
Posts: 15827
Joined: Apr 22, 2005 00:00

Postby Blue » Feb 07, 2010 15:09

Bizaflare wrote:
Musikus wrote:but why mytic did that?


hum, maybe because shrooms have more hp, nuke harder and animist is the hardest nuking hibclass with more resistance pierce you could ever imagine?

Critical statement. Because Uthgards Animist pets take *current* live tests of these pets as implementation base but still give you the chance to place 15 of these instead 5. Only thing different is that Uthgards shrooms cast faster and more consistent than on live and have less HP to balance that problem out.

About the thread. Try to find the bugs and report them. If Mid is overpowered on Uth then it was on live too around 2003. Else Uthgard has just bugs which need to be reported (like multihitrate of Savage) or population imbalance. As all said before, on Uthgard seems to be a melee/caster imbalance, so it doesnt wonder when Mid as the melee realm is somewhat imbalanced against other realms.
It's done when it's done. Thanks for your patience.
Every bug gets fixed. Sooner or later.

"It is an inescapable law of nature that the amount of satisfaction one gains from achieving something
is related to how hard it is and easy things can only elicit a fleeting superficial sort of pleasure."


Blue says, "you used macro tools or macro keyboard"
Pala says, "i am disabled. and i have a mechanic left hand that can be programed. its hard to play woith one hand"

[Appeal] Bxxxxxxxx: "why is RA first aid cann man i stealth use and not unstealth cann man ra if man use unstealth ?????????"
BannedUser: "i was not using automate game action my hand was fall on keyboard during i was sleep .... i was completly fall on keyboard ..."

Toblerone
Banned
 
Posts: 1071
Joined: Jan 27, 2010 01:00
Location: Croatia

Postby Toblerone » Feb 07, 2010 16:09

Blue wrote:If Mid is overpowered on Uth then it was on live too around 2003.


Why would you say that. Uthgard is nowhere near to what daoc was like in 2003.

Hibernia was overpowered in 2003, yet it's the worst realm on uth by far.

User avatar
afa
Warder
 
Posts: 32
Joined: Feb 18, 2009 01:00

Postby afa » Feb 07, 2010 16:12

its true hib was one of the better realms in 2003, mostly because of their ras and mezz and cc meant somthing back then.

just give us old ras or give us toa stuff so we can counter some of the ras we got now

User avatar
Neju
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 893
Joined: Sep 11, 2009 00:00

Postby Neju » Feb 07, 2010 16:23

afa wrote:just give us old ras or give us toa stuff so we can counter some of the ras we got now


This, preferably old RA though as you want Uthgard to be a *classic* server

User avatar
Amadeth
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 731
Joined: Apr 18, 2009 00:00
Location: Zagreb, Croatia

Postby Amadeth » Feb 07, 2010 16:54

Blue wrote:As all said before, on Uthgard seems to be a melee/caster imbalance, so it doesnt wonder when Mid as the melee realm is somewhat imbalanced against other realms.

Blue, did I get it wrong or did you just agree something can be done about this?

We haven't heard any news about the (possible) RA change. It would be nice to know if you guys have something on your mind..
<strong>FIX TEH PROFILE PAGE SO I CAN CHANGE MY SIG PLZ</strong>

User avatar
danteafk
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 255
Joined: Dec 09, 2009 01:00

Postby danteafk » Feb 07, 2010 16:57

i wonder why 4 of the 5 hibs on lwrp top 50 stealther are.

Toblerone
Banned
 
Posts: 1071
Joined: Jan 27, 2010 01:00
Location: Croatia

Postby Toblerone » Feb 07, 2010 17:20

danteafk wrote:i wonder why 4 of the 5 hibs on lwrp top 50 stealther are.


Blademasters with stealth ^^

User avatar
Hedra
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 1002
Joined: Mar 14, 2007 01:00

Postby Hedra » Feb 07, 2010 17:42

Blue wrote:About the thread. Try to find the bugs and report them. If Mid is overpowered on Uth then it was on live too around 2003. Else Uthgard has just bugs which need to be reported (like multihitrate of Savage) or population imbalance. As all said before, on Uthgard seems to be a melee/caster imbalance, so it doesnt wonder when Mid as the melee realm is somewhat imbalanced against other realms.

All crowd control ras are bugged on uth and have been reported, yet nothing changes ~~ Those would help casters don't you think...
I mean, a RA like TWF, ST or theu rr5 can't even allow a caster to outrun a det5 tank currently, not to mention they should remove CC immunity.

PreviousNext

Return to Realm versus Realm

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests

Sunday, 31. August 2025

Artwork and screen shots Copyright © 2001-2004 Mythic Entertainment, Inc. All rights reserved. Used with permission of Mythic Entertainment. Mythic Entertainment, the Mythic Entertainment logo, "Dark Age of Camelot," "Shrouded Isles," "Foundations," "New Frontiers," "Trials of Atlantis," "Catacombs," "Darkness Rising," the Dark Age of Camelot and subsequent logos, and the stylized Celtic knot are trademarks of Mythic Entertainment, Inc.

Valid XHTML & CSS | Original Design by: LernVid.com | Modified by Uthgard Staff