cut porttimers, introduce channelers= more inc in emain even with the same amount of players = ppl rather check out another zone instead of logging when emain is full of fgs (now they dont cause waiting another 8min to port to an empty zone is kinda senseless) = no need to give hibs a quicker port to emain, since they can make use of hadrian or odins port = more ppl willing to participate in end rvr

Bloodwyne wrote:cut porttimers, introduce channelers= more inc in emain even with the same amount of players = ppl rather check out another zone instead of logging when emain is full of fgs (now they dont cause waiting another 8min to port to an empty zone is kinda senseless) = no need to give hibs a quicker port to emain, since they can make use of hadrian or odins port = more ppl willing to participate in end rvr

as said many times by staff: wont happen


now.. next solution please?

this system is 2 month old how can ppl be already so stiff in their thinking that they made the right decisions on it... just wrong...

Bloodwyne wrote:this system is 2 month old how can ppl be already so stiff in their thinking that they made the right decisions on it... just wrong...

This system has been working perfectly for years before stupid NF brought stupid brainless instant-teleport.

If you want instant action, go and play Diablo.

this system worked on a community that was 90% new to mmorpgs and with a population of over 3000 players my friend, but dream on

Bloodwyne wrote:this system worked on a community that was 90% new to mmorpgs and with a population of over 3000 players my friend, but dream on

+1

People these days can't just go out with a group of lvl 40 unspellcrafted players and hope to kick some ass. You are either a spellcrafted lvl 50 or you make sure you are one.
Still though, even though Uthgard has got a lot of those, barely anyone seems to be incited to really RvR.

I agree with Griselda.

It's like forcing people to play in 800x600 resolution, and then screaming ROFL GO PLAY CRYSIS FOR UR UBER GRAPHIX at anyone that complains.

Uthgard has good population for rvr, the problem is that only 30/700 go frontiers. And with 150 player in frontiers you will have awesome rvr. Dont need 3k players.

Bloodwyne wrote:this system worked on a community that was 90% new to mmorpgs and with a population of over 3000 players my friend, but dream on

/sign

Bloodwyne wrote:this system worked on a community that was 90% new to mmorpgs and with a population of over 3000 players my friend, but dream on

And this is an argument because...

Agramon wasn't more action, while I played here from August to Novembre there were less groups roaming agra than in Emain. It was just more small-groups and soloers in agra, and these people are now constantly crying about the fact that they can't instantly teleport into a BG-sized RvR-area anymore. But here's the fun fact: DAoC isn't balanced for soloing, otherwise they would never have implented chars like Sorc, Bonedancer or Chargetanks. l2group imo.

DAoC originally wasn't balanced for anything except zergs, as that is the basic game premise, Realm vs Realm. l2respect other points of view IMO.

At some point de-evolving the game by using outdated game-design concepts will take its toll, if it hasn't already.

mentioning bonedancer sorc and chargetanks as a proof that daoc is not meant to be for solo and smallgroups you ripped ur self kinda. those belong to the strongest 1on1 chars in the game

You should think about that for a second.

nixian wrote:

Bloodwyne wrote:cut porttimers, introduce channelers= more inc in emain even with the same amount of players = ppl rather check out another zone instead of logging when emain is full of fgs (now they dont cause waiting another 8min to port to an empty zone is kinda senseless) = no need to give hibs a quicker port to emain, since they can make use of hadrian or odins port = more ppl willing to participate in end rvr

as said many times by staff: wont happen


now.. next solution please?

Back to nf emain as main rvr zone ~~