Rector wrote:No, it's a custom solution.

yes custom , not live-like. they get live-like what they want. you don't really care if we are in 1.69 or not.
you remove hastener , barrel cause it's not live-like and put ****** porter that is custom and also cost 100 golds.

Censorship cannot stop me
Up to you, but we wont tolerate staff insults

Ok it was little offensive,but i didnt get answer!! you deleted part with question
Why on one side you removing custom stuff to be more livelike and on other side you adding another custom things (this ports for 100g)?

It would be better if you would be happy about improvements the staff makes compared to a livelike OF-status instead of jumping onto the livelike-train. I would also like to have barrels back, instead of having a livelike situation without barrels.

This NPC can help lowering the timesink in RvR, which we see as one of the biggest problems in Uth-Endgame. The NPC helps just a little in this problem, but does it without hurting anyone.

We will do customizations to the RvR setup where needed (most of you are not tired to request non live like changes daily). Otherwise we won't able to handle improvement proposals by the player council.

We also already promised to make some port customizations in other topics. If you now try to flame on any change you get, you shouldn't wonder when your post gets censored or deleted. Such behaviour is not helping anyone.

you want it livelie? The porter would port ever 15 minutes, no emergency port, the speeder in citys removed again etc. there is a lot of custom stuff here to lessen timesinks to compensate the lower population here. I am very grateful for this.

fiskgrodan wrote:A bit offtopic but I have a suggestion for another custom feature to help the players. How about implementing the ability to group up potions in stacks? like maybe up to 10 or 100 in each stack? Would be great imo.

we had this, but it was apparently too imba so it got removed.

Blue wasn't the idea of porters to lessen the time it takes to get to rvr? this will only help those on mid/alb and with the price of 100g a port only those loaded with plats will use.

yes yes i read how its suppose to be a emergency thing, but why? we want to increase rvr. . . porters is a good idea but this kind of porter doesn't really help...

I thought in some other post you talked of a porter that would allow you to port to a keep claimed by your realm, that would have been great, but if you tried this 100g per port wouldn't make rvr faster....

Still thanks for your effort to try and help the server i know a lot of in-greats get upset at you for some of the changes you make, but you are GM and this is a free daoc so they really got no room to complain.

my 2 cents

Hibs profit as well, since if Mids/Albs are back quicker, you ll get more as well.

Great idea. Thanks!

pweet wrote:Hibs profit as well, since if Mids/Albs are back quicker, you ll get more as well.

yeah the hibs that stay out there and never die -.- im talking about getting MORE hibs into emain as well as alb/mids . . .
hibs have a long Horse ride to take.\

edit: oh and btw the HR campers don't help get more action out in emain at least if we were able to port out to a keep or somewhere near emain we can't be attacked when we're not prepared

grps who died will ve more inc on their way to emain as well. daoc is no solo game, there will be mainly improvements for grp play i guess.

I like the idea, not to have to wait for 5+ mins for the last member of the group who missed the port is a good improvement and besides it is a custom feature it is a good example of well designed custom content that doesnt betray the spirit of the patch limit of the server.

well if im the one of the group that missed port, i wont pay 100g for rejoin them faster, unless they pay for me lol

Well, yep 100g is maybe excesive I think, perhaps 10g - 20g would be ok, Ori is right, as I said I like this new feature but many players will just ignore it cause the high price.