Lets Talk About Balance of Stealth of 3 Realms

Talk about your RvR experience here
User avatar
Celteen
Alerion Knight
 
Posts: 2326
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 16:52

Postby Celteen » Jan 09, 2011 14:48

Yol wrote:Everyone knows that Alb got much much more utility with the minstrel-stealther.

Mythic noticed that too and gave the Hibs the vampyre and the mids the walkyre (with cone-ae for destealth)

But we are on uthgard... and we have to live with this old patch-stands.

I really dont like the catacomb-classes. But without them albs are better in stealther-duos or stealthergroups than the other realms. Thats a fact.

You have really a very wired way to argue. Sure they made this classes to make stealth wars even, you got the point :gaga:
Image
<<< This avatar is handmade by Inotor Wurzelbert : )
Check out the Mampfer-Threads for more.
viewtopic.php?f=10&t=25079
viewtopic.php?f=10&t=26934

User avatar
Ronian
Phoenix Knight
 
Posts: 1556
Joined: Jan 12, 2008 01:00

Postby Ronian » Jan 09, 2011 17:21

The only imbalance is melodies on a stealther class.

User avatar
Thalien
Phoenix Knight
 
Posts: 1022
Joined: Apr 18, 2009 00:00
Location: Marburg

Postby Thalien » Jan 09, 2011 18:51

Ronian wrote:The only imbalance is melodies on a stealther class.


and will be fixed soon :grin:
Fabienne - Blademaster
Junia - Bard
Audrina - Ench
-----
Zoe - Sorc
Stella - Pala
Devon - Scout

Disdain
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 463
Joined: Nov 23, 2010 13:23

Postby Disdain » Jan 09, 2011 18:59

Uthgard has tons of balance issues but none of them are stealth VS stealth related.
The Bird of the Hermes is my name
Eating my Wings to make me tame

User avatar
Yol
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 794
Joined: Jul 18, 2008 00:00
Location: Leider Forenban :(

Postby Yol » Jan 10, 2011 10:47

Disdain wrote:Uthgard has tons of balance issues but none of them are stealth VS stealth related.


If you would play a Midgard-stealther you would say different things.

And Hibernia got the benefit that the ranger is a strong stealther class... witch they will lose with old-ras.

And balance between stealth-classes must be highest priority on uthgard because the stealthers are the most played charakters on this server.

If Albion dominate the stealther-wars on uthgard (and with old-ras they will) many mids and hibs will quit or reroll an alb-stealther.

I think Mids and Hibs dont like it then wenn they get zerged every day by massive alb-stealther-zergs. BA today is a joke compared with what will happen when Mid&Hib-Stealthers will reroll an alb-stealther! So then will be 3 times so many alb-stealthers like today. Most Hibs even wouldent get to emain any more :twisted:

User avatar
Yol
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 794
Joined: Jul 18, 2008 00:00
Location: Leider Forenban :(

Postby Yol » Jan 10, 2011 10:47

Thalien wrote:
Ronian wrote:The only imbalance is melodies on a stealther class.


and will be fixed soon :grin:


??? Enlight me pls: What will be changed?

pyrale
Warder
 
Posts: 41
Joined: Jan 08, 2011 01:06

Postby pyrale » Jan 10, 2011 11:29

Yol wrote:
Thalien wrote:
Ronian wrote:The only imbalance is melodies on a stealther class.


and will be fixed soon :grin:


??? Enlight me pls: What will be changed?

old RAs :p

User avatar
vangonaj
Alerion Knight
 
Posts: 2497
Joined: Sep 14, 2007 00:00
Location: Galpen

Postby vangonaj » Jan 10, 2011 16:47

Stupid topic, and old ras will bring more imbalance to stealth.
Image

pyrale
Warder
 
Posts: 41
Joined: Jan 08, 2011 01:06

Postby pyrale » Jan 10, 2011 17:21

vangonaj wrote:Stupid topic, and old ras will bring more imbalance to stealth.

Yes and no.

Atm, there is one big imbalance which is AM. Basically, a mid/hib stealther group is not suited to fight against an alb stealther group with AM. Nothing can beat 4000 HPs over 30 seconds combined to Alb stealther's disrupting power (guarding + stuns/mezes)

Other imbalances exists, but this one alone completely destroys stealther balance. If NF RAs had been maintained, I would have advised giving AM to paladins instead (and maybe giving mincers something -not AoG- to even it out).

OF stealth war has many imbalances, some of which are way more annoying than some NF stealther imbalances, but nothing that is as annoying as the AM imbalance.

User avatar
pweet
Lion Knight
 
Posts: 4243
Joined: Dec 22, 2010 14:07

Postby pweet » Jan 10, 2011 17:48

Daoc is not balanced for stealther war, not on live, not on uth.
Regards

User avatar
Jonah
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 482
Joined: Feb 04, 2010 01:00

Postby Jonah » Jan 10, 2011 18:34

pweet wrote:Daoc is not balanced for stealther war, not on live, not on uth.
Regards


Daoc is perfectly balanced for stealther wars 1on1 as stealth wars SUPPOSE to be played. Only on this stupid server theres stealth zergs. On live 90% of the stealthers was solo. Sure there was some chockpoints with lots of stealthers but most was ungrouped and didnt add. Some few low rr duos to but thats just fun challenge for the higher rr´s.
AM as a RA was only picked by group mincers.
Those were the times!!!
Only stealther fun here is the odd fun fights u get in DF once in a while.

Old RA´s will totally imbalance the server as albion will get so strong, both group wise and stealther. My guess is that 50% of the population will be on alb 1 month after the patch. Cleric, Cleric, Mincer, Theurg, Sorc, Pala, Merc, Merc with 2XBoF and SoS will be a tough cookie to bite on.

User avatar
Jarysa
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 664
Joined: May 05, 2009 00:00

Postby Jarysa » Jan 10, 2011 18:45

Jonah wrote: On live 90% of the stealthers was solo.


Sure.














:lol:

Asloan
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 218
Joined: Nov 21, 2010 00:24

Postby Asloan » Jan 10, 2011 18:54

Yep, you never were atacked by FGs of stealthers with BG there, as soon as you reached a MG in Emain/a much traveled Bridge in NF, must have been me having a bad trip...or not? :D

User avatar
Yol
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 794
Joined: Jul 18, 2008 00:00
Location: Leider Forenban :(

Postby Yol » Jan 10, 2011 19:05

On german live servers there have been much much stealther-groups!
And there also have been Stealther Guilds too like BA.

The difference to here is: With phaseshift and c4 you had a little chance to escape to the next tower/keep there.

Dont missunderstand me pls: I really dont like TOA. But for stealthers, especially for bow-users, there have been more abilities to survive a fight then here on uthgard.

And on live the hunter was a really good stealther-char. Here on uthgard its much too weak compared with the scout or ranger.

And yes: A stealther with insta-stun, single and ae-mez, sos , am and ora/red pet is much, *to* much overpowered. And with old-ras with purge-cooldown of 30 minutes...i think i dont have to say more ...

pyrale
Warder
 
Posts: 41
Joined: Jan 08, 2011 01:06

Postby pyrale » Jan 10, 2011 19:16

Jonah wrote:
pweet wrote:Old RA´s will totally imbalance the server as albion will get so strong, both group wise and stealther. My guess is that 50% of the population will be on alb 1 month after the patch. Cleric, Cleric, Mincer, Theurg, Sorc, Pala, Merc, Merc with 2XBoF and SoS will be a tough cookie to bite on.


Hi I am mage, what is BoF ?

PreviousNext

Return to Realm versus Realm

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests

Monday, 01. September 2025

Artwork and screen shots Copyright © 2001-2004 Mythic Entertainment, Inc. All rights reserved. Used with permission of Mythic Entertainment. Mythic Entertainment, the Mythic Entertainment logo, "Dark Age of Camelot," "Shrouded Isles," "Foundations," "New Frontiers," "Trials of Atlantis," "Catacombs," "Darkness Rising," the Dark Age of Camelot and subsequent logos, and the stylized Celtic knot are trademarks of Mythic Entertainment, Inc.

Valid XHTML & CSS | Original Design by: LernVid.com | Modified by Uthgard Staff