added week6.

Do you collect the data manually ? ;o

Yes, but I optimized it with a lot of linkings in Excel and I made macros for the things that are always the same. I usually sort the herald by LWRPs and manually save the first 28 herald pages. Then I open them directly in Excel, and link all 28 sheets into one sheet. There I kill all under 10k lwrp, then I sort after RPs and kill all under 4L3. Then I click my two macro-buttons, do some work (the correct coloring of the bars in graphic6 -.-) by hand and have my graphics.

I have no skills in php, java whatever. Maybe it could be done easier with that.

added week7.
Btw I am wondering why there are so few savages and champions active?
And why do the reavers have so little lwrps in total compared to the others?

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

2 different ways of showing the same datas:

43% HIB
23% MID
34% ALB

Using a 3D pie chart and putting the smaller part of the pie on its lower side is misleading: that part looks bigger than in the old, nice and realisitc 2D chart.

http://lilt.ilstu.edu/gmklass/pos138/da ... dchart.htm

My 2 eurocents

Haha, nice I can even learn something here
Didn't think about it, but you're right, a 2D chart is better, as Midgard and Albion look equal like it is now.
Will update that next time.

Well, amazing work again Rector, now let's discuss this graphic 1d.

The trend showed is clear for all three realms (less in mid, but this realm is a bit sleeping in RvR atm, so less data -> less precision, this is obvious) and as Force wrote: there are no exception.

So you think this would look different on liveservers at classic times?
I think it's okay that dual-wield classes do most of the realmpoints, but the contrast between the two meleetypes is very high on Uthgard. Non-dual wielders as damagedealers seem to be very unpopular. So staff, please fix this until old RAs are established, so we can see a change here when I'll do this statistic a 2nd time

added week8.
Gogogo Midgard! That developing looks good!

Lol really nice new graphs Rector, i like very much the 6b, brilliant idea!

We can discuss a lot from it i think! For example we can see which classes are the "new fotm" (high numbers low rr) or the opposite (low numbers high rr) like bd.

I think low numbers means: Class is very unpopular.
Having a high average RR at an unpopular class means: There must be masochists around who love to play unpopular classes

Rector wrote:I think low numbers means: Class is very unpopular.
Having a high average RR at an unpopular class means: There must be masochists around who love to play unpopular classes

Yes low numbers = unpopular and often it means that the class is weak or uncomplete (like bd, wizard, animist, etc), if high rr -> players using this class are always the same from a lot of time.
But if we see a class with high numbers and low average rr it means that there are a lot of new char of this class in RvR (infis for example, and other graphs confirm this).
With all the limits because of the relatively low numbers of uthgard.

thanks for your work rector

np
added week9.

added week 10.
I'll maybe do some more weeks as it seems that the realms total LWRPs % are getting more even atm.