-
Glacius
-
|
by Glacius » Oct 02, 2009 00:05
Demiurgo wrote:Today in rvr I saw some enemy with around 60% slash resist (was not savages). I've never seen something like that, is that some group realm ability/skill I don't know? I though to bof, but bof raise only ABS and not resist. The same day they used bof and I didn't saw this resist increase Here the screenshots: http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/9105/sshot001a.jpghttp://img39.imageshack.us/img39/7228/sshot007o.jpgTarget are healer and shaman. Mid chain got slash resist, but from 26% to 60% I think the malus is a bit high
ROFL what answers some ppl can give, res sicknes,bof<Sob ..  ))))))) apart from arcehr classes and casters, savages no1 can make such high resists to melee , absorb its absorb, wil decrease dmg..but not with a given resistance, i dont know for how much dmg u hit em normalyy, i see 88 mainh, thats good or bad? its a bug but until we dont know if that the dmg u normally make on them we cant sya that its only an display bug, or resist rate bug . Merlinum wrote:Mmm if Gm take you and this player for a test we can say if they use a bug or exploit. Thanks
Bugs are enough to EXIST, saying that some1 is using em in this case ..its kinda exagerated imo, the player got hit for 80(-140) ..not his fault.
Last edited by Glacius on Oct 02, 2009 15:14, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
-
Merlinum
- Warder
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Nov 29, 2007 01:00
|
by Merlinum » Oct 02, 2009 06:31
Mmm if Gm take you and this player for a test we can say if they use a bug or exploit. Thanks
|
|
-
Demiurgo
- Phoenix Knight
-
- Posts: 1499
- Joined: Mar 11, 2007 01:00
|
by Demiurgo » Oct 03, 2009 20:34
So, if none can give an explanation, how should we transform this into a bug report making happy all people?
|
|
-
Glacius
-
|
by Glacius » Oct 04, 2009 10:43
My dear friend , because here RA s and some other abilites r diplayed diferent then how they used to be on official servers(and i m sure that wrong values can be displayed), i cant say if its a display bug of some Bof ra etc, or indeed u should have done higher dmg and u got a horible resist to your hits, plz give a pic with your dmg vs them if u got the chance soon , so we can compare.
|
|
-

Mafioso
- Warder
-
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Sep 27, 2009 00:00
|
by Mafioso » Oct 04, 2009 18:13
he has baxed resists, and you hitting chain with slash ~.~ thats another bonus 10% resist. and i have no doubt it's bof stacking on that, easily 50-60%
|
|
-

Jarysa
- Eagle Knight
-
- Posts: 664
- Joined: May 05, 2009 00:00
|
by Jarysa » Oct 04, 2009 21:07
Mafioso wrote:he has baxed resists, and you hitting chain with slash ~.~ thats another bonus 10% resist. and i have no doubt it's bof stacking on that, easily 50-60%
bof should not give resists
|
|
-

Mafioso
- Warder
-
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Sep 27, 2009 00:00
|
by Mafioso » Oct 05, 2009 16:16
as was mentioned, ra display here is different, so it may do that here.
|
|
-

Jarysa
- Eagle Knight
-
- Posts: 664
- Joined: May 05, 2009 00:00
|
by Jarysa » Oct 05, 2009 17:40
Mafioso wrote:as was mentioned, ra display here is different, so it may do that here.
bof giving resists and displaying as resists would be a bug
which is .. uhm .. like the point of this thread?
|
|
-

saswp
- Myrmidon
-
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Nov 04, 2008 01:00
|
by saswp » Oct 08, 2009 05:31
What troubles me is the 36 (-61) and the 64 (-112) which is more then 90%.
I think it would be wise to look into it to be sure.
|
|
-
Gerbald
- Phoenix Knight
-
- Posts: 1546
- Joined: Jul 01, 2005 00:00
|
by Gerbald » Oct 08, 2009 07:38
saswp wrote:What troubles me is the 36 (-61) and the 64 (-112) which is more then 90%.
I think it would be wise to look into it to be sure.
I beg to differ, its in both cases in the low 60s, like 62,89% and 63,64% to be precise (rounded for 2 digits). Thats still a lot, but far from 90%.
|
|
-

saswp
- Myrmidon
-
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Nov 04, 2008 01:00
|
by saswp » Oct 08, 2009 10:41
Gerbald wrote:saswp wrote:What troubles me is the 36 (-61) and the 64 (-112) which is more then 90%.
I think it would be wise to look into it to be sure.
I beg to differ, its in both cases in the low 60s, like 62,89% and 63,64% to be precise (rounded for 2 digits). Thats still a lot, but far from 90%.
oops it was suppose to be 60% is what i mean. 
|
|