4,100 level 50s on Midgard. Wouldn't be surprised if only 1000-2000 accounts have a 50 on Midgard. Some players have 4+ 50s.

Approximately 44,000 characters created (probably a conservative estimate). Less than 10% of unique players have a level 50 that ever touched Midgard.

How many players gave up on road to 50? How many didn't make it to 40?

Is this healthy for the server? Devs argue insta-50 is bad. I agree (no one really asks for that).

But an insane XP grind is also bad. Numbers above.

Severian wrote:4,100 level 50s on Midgard. Wouldn't be surprised if only 1000-2000 accounts have a 50 on Midgard. Some players have 4+ 50s.

Approximately 44,000 characters created (probably a conservative estimate). Less than 10% of unique players have a level 50 that ever touched Midgard.

How many players gave up on road to 50? How many didn't make it to 40?

Is this healthy for the server? Devs argue insta-50 is bad. I agree (no one really asks for that).

But an insane XP grind is also bad. Numbers above.

I agree something definitely related to XP.

The thing is I can understand GM want to hold their thoughts but as the community suggest we could find compromise.

If leveling were less painful this server could be so animated and much more crowded!

I dont know maybe put Happy hours XP, or Friday - Sunday XP bonus by XX%. Something more regular who will give a better experiences, and also make people think Admin are aware of it

Abydos wrote:That doesn't begin to address the question of why NA is such difference to EU.

The answer is Germans.

Germans are hardcore as hell when it comes to games, they are usually the last to leave a server/game when it's long out of fashion.

And no, I'm no joking either.

phixion wrote:

Abydos wrote:That doesn't begin to address the question of why NA is such difference to EU.

The answer is Germans.

Germans are hardcore as hell when it comes to games, they are usually the last to leave a server/game when it's long out of fashion.

And no, I'm no joking either.

So NA means "fast food" thinking & playing? ;P

Any chance this will happen? Our group barely missed port 5 times a couple days ago. Over a half hour sitting on the pad waiting when we only play 2-3 hours seems excessive.

3m ports all the time please.

lets see! can only re-emphasize that instant porters would be bad for several reasons that have been pointed out throughout the discussion.

still think that reducing the portertime would improve to have good action in the fzs. and even if for example it would take hibs a bit longer to get to emain.....some ppl might see that as a disadvantage but enemies will run towards DL aswell....and as an hib i would be totally fine with that....

and off topic: maybe another xp or even a rvr event would be nice to have? no clue what the chances are to make that happen